medigraphic.com
Órgano de Difusión de la Asociación Académica Panamericana de Medicina Familiar A.C.

2024, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Arch Med Fam 2024; 26 (4)

Association between Family Support and Glycemic control in a Family Medicine Unit in Ciudad Madero, Tamaulipas. Mexico

Carrillo ALA, Estrada MKP, Martínez POE, Salas FR, Cervantes LMJ, González PB

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 191-195
PDF size: 179.26 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the association between the degree of perceived family support (PFS) and glycemic control in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Cross-sectional study, non-probabilistic sampling was carried out among patients with DM2 from UMF No. 77 from Ciudad Madero, Tamaulipas. Mexico. A sample of 210 patients who met the inclusion criteria was obtained. After informed consent, sociodemographic characteristics and determination of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were obtained, establishing values of ‹6.5% as glycemic control. A validated instrument was applied to evaluate the degree of PFS (mild, moderate, high). Results: Of the total of 186 patients, 36% had good glycemic control. 26.3% presented complications of the disease and were associated with poor glycemic control. Patients with low PFS had twice the risk of poor glycemic control compared to patients with moderate and high levels of PFS. Conclusions: Family support is crucial for glucose control in patients with DM2, in turn the complications of the disease are associated with poor glycemic control.


REFERENCES

  1. Escobedo J, Buitrón LV, Velasco MF, et al. High prevalenceof diabetes and impaired fasting glucosein urban Latin America: the CARMELA Study. DiabetMed. 2009;26(9):864-871. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02795.x

  2. Villalpando S, de la Cruz V, Rojas R, et al. Prevalenceand distribution of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Mexicanadult population: a probabilistic survey. Salud PublicaMex. 2010;52 Suppl 1:S19-S26. doi:10.1590/s0036-36342010000700005

  3. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification andDiagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Carein Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl1):S13-S27. doi:10.2337/dc18-S002

  4. Levy TS, Rivera-Dommarco J, Bertozzi S. EncuestaNacional de Salud y Nutrición 2018-19: análisisde sus principales resultados. Salud Publica Mex.2020;62(6):614-617.

  5. Stopford R, Winkley K, Ismail K. Social support andglycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic reviewof observational studies. Patient Educ Couns.2013;93(3):549-558. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.016

  6. González CP. El Apoyo familiar en la adherencia al tratamientonutricional del paciente con diabetes mellitustipo 2 (DM2). Waxapa. 2011;3(2): 102-107.

  7. Guía de Práctica Clínica. 2013. Diagnóstico, metasde control ambulatorio y referencia oportuna de Prediabetesy Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 en Adultos en elPrimer Nivel de Atención. México: Secretaria de Salud.

  8. Guía de Práctica Clínica. Tratamiento de la DiabetesMellitus tipo 2 en el primer nivel de atención. 2014.Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.

  9. Valadez Figueroa I, Alfaro N, Centeno G, , Cabrera C.Diseño de un instrumento para evaluar apoyo familiaral diabético tipo 2 . Investigación en Salud [Internet].2003;V(3):0. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14250305

  10. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial ResearchGroup, Nathan DM, Genuth S, et al. The effect ofintensive treatment of diabetes on the developmentand progression of long-term complicationsin insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. NEngl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-986. doi:10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.

  11. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metforminon complications in overweight patients withtype 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective DiabetesStudy (UKPDS) Group [published correctionappears in Lancet 1998 Nov 7;352(9139):1558]. Lancet.1998;352(9131):854-865.

  12. Coker AO, Fasanmade AO. Quality of care for patientswith type 2 diabetes in Lagos University Teaching Hospital.Nig Qt J Hosp Med. 2006; 16: 6-9

  13. López RC, Ávalos GI. Diabetes mellitus hacia una perspectivasocial. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública. 2013;39(2): 331-345.

  14. Marisol L, Rivera L. Tesis Relación de Apoyo Familiary Control Glucémico en Familias con Diabetes Tipo 2[Tesis]. México: Benemérita Universidad Autónomade Puebla.2016 [citado 2 de junio del 2022]. Disponibleen: https://repositorioinstitucional.buap.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.12371/1 768/593016T.pdf?sequence=1

  15. Gomes-Villas BL, Foss MC, Freitas MC, Pace AE. Relationshipamong social support, treatment adherenceand metabolic control of diabetes mellitus patients.Rev. Latino-Am. 2012; 20(1):52-58.

  16. Hernández-Nava JA, Rodríguez-Bustos B, Sierra-TorresA. 2014. El paciente diabético y su entorno familiar ysocial. Sx Cardiometabólico Diabetes. México. Vol. 1:38-42

  17. Méndez-López D, Gómez-López V, García-Ruiz M, Pérez-López J, Navarrete- Escobar H. Disfunción familiary control del paciente diabético tipo 2. Rev Med IMSS2004; 42 (4): 281-4.

  18. Ávila-Jiménez L, Cerón O D, Ramos-Hernández RI, VelázquezL L. Asociación del control glicémico con elapoyo familiar y el nivel de conocimientos en pacientescon diabetes tipo 2 [Association of family support andknowledge about the disease with glycemic control indiabetic patients]. Rev Med Chil. 2013;141(2):173-180.doi:10.4067/S0034-98872013000200005

  19. Alba L, Bastidas C, Vivas J, Gil F. Prevalence of glycemiccontrol and associated factors in type 2 diabetesmellitus patients at the Hospital Universitario de SanIgnacio, Bogotá-Colombia. Gac Med Mex 2009; 145 (6):469-74.

  20. Reynoso-Vázquez J, Hernández-Rivero E, Martínez-VillamilM, Zamudio-López, JL, Islas-Vega I, Pelcastre-Neri A, Garnica-Guerrero B, Ruvalcaba-LedezmaJC. La atención en casa: El apoyo familiar en el controlglicémico en pacientes con diabetes mellitustipo 2. Hospital a Domicilio, 2020;4(4),199-207. doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v4i4.118

  21. Grober E, Hall CB, Hahn SR, Lipton RB. Memory Impairmentand Executive Dysfunction are Associated withInadequately Controlled Diabetes in Older Adults. JPrim Care Community Health. 2011;2(4):229-233.doi:10.1177/2150131911409945

  22. Crimmins EM, Kim JK, Langa KM, Weir DR. Assessmentof cognition using surveys and neuropsychological assessment:the Health and Retirement Study and theAging, Demographics, and Memory Study. J Gerontol BPsychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011;66 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i162-i171.doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr048

  23. García-Morales G, Rodríguez-Pascual A, Garibo-PolancoRE. Apoyo familiar y control glucémico en pacientescon diabetes tipo 2 en una unidad de medicina familiarde Acapulco, Guerrero, México. Aten Fam. 2018;25(1):27-31.

  24. Bethari D, Gayatri D. Family Support and Dietary Adherencein Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Patients in a PublicHealth Center (Puskesmas) Depok. UI Proc HealthMed. 2017; 3(1): p. 13 - 16.

  25. Pamungkas RA, Chamroonsawasdi K, VatanasomboonP. A Systematic Review: Family Support Integratedwith Diabetes Self-Management among UncontrolledType II Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Behav Sci (Basel).2017;7(3):62. Published 2017 Sep 15. doi:10.3390/bs7030062




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com