Niño B, Quevedo M, Maridueña TDJ, Barrios A, Ollalve S

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 77-81
PDF size: 278.82 Kb.

ABSTRACT

There are several reconstruction options for joint replacement from the first fully metal Vitek-Kent ATM prostheses with complications due to reactions due to detachment of particles in the glenoid fossa to the personalized prostheses with polyethylene fossa and a titanium component to fix the eminence with evident improvement to the opening and reduction of postoperative pain. A clinical case of a 19-year-old male patient with a diagnosis of plexiform ameloblastoma is reported in the body, branch, coronoid process and mandibular condyle to the left. Knowing that ameloblastoma is a benign, locally invasive and highly recurrent odontogenic neoplasm of slow growth that rarely causes metastases, with condylar process of titanium alloy, chromium and colbate in addition to the Tecapeek joint component with graphene, obtaining satisfactory results, demonstrating that the planning and reconstruction adjusted to the needs of the patient give both aesthetic and functionally adequate results.

REFERENCES

1. Díaz DD, Sarracent VY, Guerra CO, Martínez GN. Ameloblastoma. Revisión de la literatura. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas. 2014;13(6):862-872.

2. Carini F, Riazzoli G, Vignoletti F, Baldoni M. Ameloblastoma plexiforme del maxilar: manejo quirúrgico y protético. A propósito de un caso. Av Odontoestomatol. 2007; 23 (1): 11-20.

3. Navarro DM. Ameloblastoma. Revisión de la literatura. Rev Cuba Estomatol. 2009; 46 (39: 48-61.

4. Regezi JA. Oral Pathology. Clinical Pathology Correlations. St. Louis, Missouri USA: Elsevier Science; 2003.

5. Di Cosola M, Turco M, Bizzoca G, Tavoulari K, Capodiferro S, Escudero-Castaño N, et al. El ameloblastoma del hueso maxilar y mandibular: un estudio clínico basado en nuestra experiencia. Av Odontoestomatol. 2007; 23(6): 359-373.

6. Raspall G. Tumores de Cara, Boca, Cabeza y Cuello. Barcelona: Masson; 2000.

7. EI-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ. WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours (4th Edition). Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2017.

8. Donado M. Cirugía Oral. Patología y Técnica. Barcelona: Masson; 1998.

9. Sapp JP. Patología Oral y Maxilofacial Contemporánea. Madrid, España: Elsevier; 2004.

10. Soluk-Tekkesin M, Wright JM. The World Health Organization Classification of odontogenic lesions: a summary of the changes of the 2022 (5th) edition. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2022; 38 (2): 168-184.

11. Valecillos-Fuenmayor MV, Guillen-Rivera GJ, Ortega-Pertuz AI, Pérez L. Ameloblastoma uniquístico intramural en maxilar superior. Reporte de un caso. Odontol Sanmarquina. 2018; 21 (4): 322.

12. Neville WB. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Philadelphia, USA: W.B. Saunders Company; 2002.

13. Roberto-Elias R, Ferreira-Elias C, Elias R. Ameloblastoma uniquístico en el maxilar superior - reporte de caso clínico. Acta Odont Venez. 2013; 51 (4): 1-7.

14. Odell EW. Cawson's Essentials of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine E-Book. España: Elsevier Science Limited; 2017.

15. Navarro-Villa C. Cirugía Oral. Madrid: S.A. Aran Ediciones; 2008.

16. Gatti PC, Florencia D, Ruiz D, Giannunzio G. Reconstrucción con prótesis customizada de articulación temporomandibular tras resección de ameloblastoma. Lat Am J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 1 (1): 35-39. doi: 10.35366/101916.

17. Philip James, Rodriguez J. Nuevos avances en las protesis ATM customizadas: nuestra experiencia en el Hospital La Princesa. Rev Esp Cirug Oral y Maxilofac. 2019; 41 (4): 167-171.