medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2961 (Print)

2022, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cuba Enf 2022; 38 (2)

Perceptions of Nursing students regarding the use of the ''Libro'' Moodle Tool

González-Sanz JD, Cervera BA, Triviño-García, MÁ

Language: Spanish
References: 40
Page: 1-19
PDF size: 624.63 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The training of nurses in management and leadership has an important impact on the present and future of the profession. However, the teaching and evaluation carried out in the undergraduate level, in their first contact with the subject, can generate dissatisfaction.
Objective: To describe the perceptions of students of Nursing Administration and Management regarding a teaching innovation based on using the "Libro" tool in the framework of teaching by means of a flipped classroom.
Methods: Exploratory and mixed study carried out between October and December 2020 at the University of Huelva, Spain, by means of an anonymous survey conducted with a sample of 140 students (of the total of 145 students from the third academic year). The data were processed in Excel and analyzed descriptively (quantitative data) and by categories (qualitative data).
Results: The average evaluation of using the "Libro" tool was 9.10 out of 10. 92.00 % of the students were satisfied with the teaching methodology and 92.90 % were satisfied with the evaluation. The students stated that their opinion of the contents had improved thanks to the methodology used.
Conclusion: Most of the students participating in this study were satisfied with the use of the Moodle tool within a teaching setting of flipped classroom.


REFERENCES

  1. Farley L. Campus Virtual: la educación más allá del LMS. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento. 2007 [acceso: 21/05/2021];4(1):1-7. Disponible en: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/149482/1.

  2. Page`s Costas C. El aula Moodle: aprender y enseñar en la UB. En: El aula Moodle. 1th Ediciones Octaedro; 2016 [acceso: 25/05/2021]. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/1439872.

  3. Arnaldos F, Faura U, López Hernández F, Silva M, Ruíz Marín M. Frecuencia de uso de las plataformas virtuales de enseñanza. Una comparación Moodle versus3. Sakai en los estudios de perfil económico. Revista de Investigación en Educación. 2015 [acceso: 21/05/2021];13(1):69-87. Disponible en: http://reined.webs.uvigo.es/index.php/reined/article/view/2423.

  4. Pruneda González RE, Castillo Sánchez M del C, Mozos del Olmo CM, Muñoz Espinosa, EM, Sanz Redondo AM. Moodle: Gestión de contenidos online. Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha; 2020;(17). DOI: http://doi.org/10.18239/atena.17.20194.

  5. Fracchia C, Alonso Armiño A. Moodle en la enseñanza universitaria: uso novedoso de la actividad libro. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación en Tecnología y Tecnología en Educación. 2013;10:65-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.0.p.%2065-705.

  6. Fracchia C, Plaza J. Análisis de los materiales educativos incorporados a la plataforma PEDCO. RUEDA. V Seminario Internacional. Universidad Nacional Del Centro De La Provincia De Buenos Aires. Tandil, Bs. As., Argentina; 2010.

  7. Sánchez J, Morales S. Docencia universitaria con apoyo de entornos virtuales de aprendizaje (EVA). Digital Education Review. 2012 [acceso: 21/05/2021];21:33-46. Disponible en: https://www.raco.cat/index.php/DER/article/view/2542107.

  8. Sánchez Santamaría J, Sánchez Antolín P, Ramos Pardo FJ. Usos pedagógicos de Moodle en la docencia Universitaria desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. 2012 [acceso: 21/05/2021];60:15-38. Disponible en: https://ssrn.com/abstract=23405988.

  9. Berenguer Albaladejo C. Acerca de la utilidad del aula invertida o flipped classroom. En: Tortosa Ybáñez MT, Grau S Company y Álvarez SD Teruel (Coord.), XIV Jornadas de redes de investigación en docencia universitaria. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante; 2016 [acceso: 21/05/2021]:(1466-80). Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/59358

  10. Aguilera-Ruíz C, Manzano-León A, Martínez-Moreno I, Lozano-Segura MC, Casiano Yanicelli C. El modelo flipped classrom. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. 2017 [acceso: 21/05/2021];4(1):261-66. Disponible en: https://revista.infad.eu/index.php/IJODAEP/article/view/105510.

  11. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 2004;24:105-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

  12. Rozas MR, Costa J, Francés L, Viñas H, Paulí A, Martínez C. Self-evaluation of nursing learning with Hot Potatoes interactive exercises. Educ Med. 2008 [acceso: 21/05/2021];11:19-27. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/4414312.

  13. Green RD, Schlairet MC. Moving toward heutagogical learning: Illuminating undergraduate nursing students' experiences in a flipped classroom. Nurse Education Today. 2017 [acceso: 03/06/2021];49:122-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.01613.

  14. Huang H, Chou C, Leu S, You HL, Tiao MM, Chen CH. Effects of a quasi-experimental study of using flipped classroom approach to teach evidence-based medicine to medical technology students. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:31-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1946-714.

  15. Critz CM, Knight D. Using the flipped classroom in graduate nursing education. Nurse Educator. 2013;38(5):210-13. DOI: doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182a0e56a15.

  16. Missildine K, Fountain R, Summers L, Gosselin K. Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education. 2013;52(10):597-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20130919-0316.

  17. Schwartz TA. Flipping the statistics classroom in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education. 2014;53(4):199-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140325-0217.

  18. Betihavas V, Bridgman H, Kornhaber R, Cross M. The evidence for 'flipping out': A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today. 2016;38:15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.01018.

  19. Fernández-Ponce C, Arbulo-Echevarría M, Muñoz-Miranda JP, Aguado E, García-Cózar F. Análisis de la evaluación continua en el contexto del EEES. Revista Docencia e Investigación. 2017 [acceso: 03/06/2021];1(27):81-100. Disponible en: https://revista.uclm.es/index.php/rdi/article/view/123419.

  20. Joyce BL, Harmon MJ, Johnson RH, Hicks V, Brown-Schott N, Pillin LB. Using a quality improvement model to enhance community/public health nursing education. Public Health Nursing. 2019;36:847-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.1265620.

  21. Harris Ware KS, Benson AD. Student and Faculty Experiences in the Flipped Learning Environment in Undergraduate Nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2019 [acceso: 03/06/2021];40(2):79-83. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/neponline/FullText/2019/03000/Student_and_Faculty_Experiences_in_the_Flipped.4.aspx21.

  22. Cho MK, Kim MY. Outcomes and influential factors applying flipped learning methods in a clinical adult nursing practicum. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2019;25(2):127-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.1272422.

  23. Oh J, Kim SJ, Kim S, Kang KA, Kan J, Bartlett R. Development and evaluation of flipped learning using film clips within a nursing informatics course. Japan Journal of Nursing Science. 2019;16(4):385-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12245

  24. Barbour C, Schuessler JB. A preliminary framework to guide implementation of The Flipped Classroom Method in nursing education. Nurse Education in Practice. 2019;34:34-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.11.00124.

  25. Oliver R, Luther L. Flipping the Graduate Nursing Classroom: An Integrative Review. Journal of Nursing Education. 2020;59(6):305-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20200520-0225.

  26. Craft JA, Christensen M, Shaw N, Bakon S. Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study. Nurse Education Today. 2017;59:6-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.00926.

  27. Zhou H, Liu M, Zeng J, Zhua J. Selection of nursing teaching strategies in mainland China: A questionnaire survey. Nurse Education Today. 2016;39:147-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.02227.

  28. Kang HY, Kim HR. Impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in the public healthcare education course: a review of flipped classroom with team-based learning. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02508-y28.

  29. Ward M, Knowlton MC, Laney CW. The flip side of traditional nursing education: A literature review. Nurse Education in Practice. 2018;29:163-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.01.00329.

  30. Silva de Oliveira Nunes LF, Nogueira Valença C, Batista da Silva MC. Contribuciones de las Tecnologías Digitales en la Educación Permanente de Enfermeras. Rev Cubana Enferm. 2020 [acceso: 03/06/2021];36(2):e3275. Disponible en: http://revenfermeria.sld.cu/index.php/enf/article/view/327530.

  31. Njie-Carr VP, Ludeman E, Lee MC, Dordunoo D, Trocky NM, Jenkins LS. An Integrative Review of Flipped Classroom Teaching Models in Nursing Education. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2017;33(2):133-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.07.00131.

  32. Dehghanzadeh S, Jafaraghaee F. Comparing the effects of traditional lecture and flipped classroom on nursing students' critical thinking disposition: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today. 2018;71:151-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.02732.

  33. Youhasan P, Chen Y, Lyndon M, Henning MA. Exploring the pedagogical design features of the flipped classroom in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review. BMC Nursing. 2021;20(1):50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00555-w33.

  34. Castro MJ, López M, Cao MJ, Fernández-Castro M, García S, Frutos M, et al. Impact of educational games on academic outcomes of students in the Degree in Nursing. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0220388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.022038834.

  35. Gómez-Urquiza JL, Gómez-Salgado J, Albendín-García L, Correa-Rodríguez M, González-Jiménez E, Cañadas-De la Fuente GA. The impact on nursing students' opinions and motivation of using a »,» ®,® §,§ ­,­ ¹,¹ ²,² ³,³ ß,ß Þ,Þ þ,þ ×,× Ú,Ú ú,ú Û,Û û,û Ù,Ù ù,ù ¨,¨ Ü,Ü ü,ü Ý,Ý ý,ý ¥,¥ ÿ,ÿ ¶,¶ Nursing Escape Room »,» ®,® §,§ ­,­ ¹,¹ ²,² ³,³ ß,ß Þ,Þ þ,þ ×,× Ú,Ú ú,ú Û,Û û,û Ù,Ù ù,ù ¨,¨ Ü,Ü ü,ü Ý,Ý ý,ý ¥,¥ ÿ,ÿ ¶,¶ as a teaching game: A descriptive study. Nurse Education Today. 2019;72:73-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.01835.

  36. San Martín-Rodríguez L, Escalada-Hernández P, Soto-Ruiz N. A themed game to learn about nursing theories and models: A descriptive study. Nurse Education in Practice. 2020;49:102905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.10290536.

  37. Puppe JM, Nelson DM. How to Flip the Classroom to Improve Learner Engagement. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development. 2019 [acceso: 03/06/2021];35(4):196-203. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/jnsdonline/Fulltext/2019/07000/How_to_Flip_the_Classroom_to_Improve_Learner.5.aspx37.

  38. Singh K, Mahajan R, Gupta P, Singh T. Flipped Classroom: A Concept for Engaging Medical Students in Learning. Indian Pediatrics. 2018;55(6):507-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-018-1342-038.

  39. Rotellar C, Cain J. Research, Perspectives, and Recommendations on Implementing the Flipped Classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2016;80(2):34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8023439.

  40. French H, Arias-Shah A, Gisondo C, Gray MM. Perspectives: The Flipped Classroom in Graduate Medical Education. Neo Reviews. 2020;21(3):e150-e156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.21-3-e15040.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com