medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica

ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Simulación Clínica 2024; 6 (2)

Evaluating the impact of near-peer teaching on medical student satisfaction in simulation-based education

Jair-Nara-Guadarrama D, Chaparro-Obregón MF
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/117466

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/117466
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/117466

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 79-84
PDF size: 357.62 Kb.


Key words:

near peer teaching, clinical simulation, student satisfaction, medical education.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: near peer teaching (NPT), where senior students teach junior peers, has emerged as an effective approach in medical education. Objective: to evaluate the impact of NPT on medical students' satisfaction during clinical simulation practices at Universidad Anáhuac Querétaro Simulation Center. Material and methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted from August to September 2023, involving 100 medical students who attended simulation practices taught by near peer instructors (senior medical interns). Student satisfaction was assessed using a validated 19-item questionnaire with subscales for realism, transferability, and value. Results: students reported high satisfaction levels across all subscales. 95% agreed the scenarios recreated real-life situations, 94% felt prepared for real clinical environments and 96% considered it a valuable learning experience. Subscale scores showed positive correlations with overall satisfaction. Conclusions: near peer teaching in simulation practices was associated with high student satisfaction levels in terms of realism, transferability to real settings, and perceived value.


REFERENCES

  1. Bowyer ER, Shaw SC. Informal near-peer teaching in medical education: A scoping review. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2021; 34 (1): 29-33.

  2. Burgess A, McGregor D, Mellis C. Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14: 115.

  3. Hall S, Lewis M, Border S, Powell M. Near peer teaching in clinical neuroanatomy. Clin Teach. 2014; 10: 350-353.

  4. Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: Twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 591-599.

  5. Tolsgaard MG, Gustafsson A, Rasmussen MB, Hoiby P, Müller CG, Ringsted C. Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 553-557.

  6. Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Hawken SJ, Hill AG. Medical students-as-teachers: A systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011; 2: 157-172.

  7. Topping KJ. Trends in peer learning. Educ Psychol. 2005; 25: 631-645.

  8. Wadoodi A, Crosby JR. Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: A classic concept revisited. Med Teach. 2002; 24: 241-244.

  9. Salinas Gutiérrez A, Morales Lozano JA, Martínez Camblor P. Student satisfaction and university quality: An analysis of their relationship. Rev Enseñanza Univ. 2009; 31: 63-78.

  10. Feingold CE, Calaluce M, Kallen MA. Computerized patient model and simulated clinical experiences: Evaluation with baccalaureate nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 2004; 43: 156-163.




Table 1
Table 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Simulación Clínica. 2024;6