Trueba GR, Estrada JH

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: s51-54
PDF size: 213.29 Kb.

REFERENCES

1. Tahir S, Bourquard T, Musnier A, Jullian Y, Corde Y, Omahdi Z et al. Accurate determination of epitope for antibodies with unknown 3D structures. MAbs. 2021; 13 (1): 1961349.

2. Hu YJ, Lin SC, Lin YL, Lin KH, You SN. A meta-learning approach for B-cell conformational epitope prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014; 15 (1): 378.

3. ISBT. RHD blood group alleles. 2022 [Cited 2022, 31 March] Available in: https://www.isbtweb.org/resource/004rhd.html

4. Kulkarni S, Mohanty D, Gupte S, Vasantha K, Joshi S. Flow cytometric quantification of antigen D sites on red blood cells of partial D and weak D variants in India. Transfus Med. 2006; 16 (4): 285-289.

5. Faas BHW, Beckers EAM, Maaskant-van-Wijk PA, Overbeeke MAM, Van Rhenen DJ. Molecular characterization of quantitative Rh variants. Biotest Bulletin. 1997; 5: 439-449.

6. Lomas C, Tippett P, Thompson KM, Melamed MD, Hughes-Jones NC. Demonstration of seven epitopes on the Rh antigen D using human monoclonal anti-D antibodies and red cells from D categories. Vox Sang. 1989; 57 (4): 261-264.

7. Scott M. Rh serology—coordinator's report. Transfus Clin Biol. 1996; 3 (6): 333-337.

8. Scott ML, Voak D, Jones JW, Avent ND, Liu W, Hughes-Jones N et al.. A structural model for 30 Rh D epitopes based on serological and DNA sequence data from partial D phenotypes. Transfus Clin Biol. 1996; 3 (6): 391-396.

9. Wagner FF, Flegel WA. Review: the molecular basis of the Rh blood group phenotypes. Immunohematology. 2004; 20 (1): 23-36.

10. George KL, Horne WS. Foldamer tertiary structure through sequence-guided protein backbone alteration. Acc Chem Res. 2018; 51 (5): 1220-1228.

11. Gromiha MM, Selvaraj S. Inter-residue interactions in protein folding and stability. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2004; 86 (2): 235-277.

12. Meireles MR, Stelmach LH, Bandinelli E, Vieira GF. Unveiling the influence of factor VIII physicochemical properties on hemophilia A phenotype through an in silico methodology. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022; 219: 106768.

13. Wagner FF, Gassner C, Müller TH, Schonitzer D, Schunter F, Flegel WA. Molecular basis of weak D phenotypes. Blood. 1999; 93 (1): 385-393.

14. Trueba-Gómez R, Rosenfeld-Mann F, Baptista-González HA, Domínguez-López ML, Estrada-Juárez H. Use of computational biology to compare the theoretical tertiary structures of the most common forms of RhCE and RhD. Vox Sang. 2023; 118 (10): 881-890.

15. Trueba-Gómez R, Rosenfeld-Mann F, Estrada-Juárez H. Prediction of the antigenic regions in eight RhD variants identified by