medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2024; 47 (4)

Validation and Adaptation of the Spanish Version of Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs survey (CaSUN-MX) for Use in the Mexican Adult Oncology Population

Mazatán OR, Torres AC, Zayas-Villanueva OA, Reynoso GOU, Fraga-Sastrias Juan-Manuel, Sierra-Murguía MA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 26
Page: 151-160
PDF size: 242.93 Kb.


Key words:

Cancer, survival, needs, validity, reliabilit.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Cancer survivorship in Mexico is a research topic that is still in its infancy. No specific studies have been found on the needs of this population, meaning that there are no validated scales in the Mexican population measuring the needs of cancer survivors. Objective. To validate and adapt the Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs survey, Spanish version (CaSUN-Mx) for use in the Mexican adult oncology population. Method. One hundred and eighty participants answered the questionnaire (CaSUN-S). For the analysis, the study was divided into three phases: content validity, construct validity, and internal consistency analysis. Results. The final version of the adapted questionnaire (CaSUN-Mx) has 34 items and one open question. It was divided into five factors with a total Cronbach’s Alpha of .95 and a value of over .85, in all the subscales (psychological care, comprehensive and collaborative care, practical and information needs, and those associated with effects. Discussion and conclusion. The CaSUN-Mx questionnaire has content validity because it has been adequately linguistically and culturally adapted, and construct validity because of its factorial structure, and reliability, making it suitable for use in the Mexican adult oncology population.


REFERENCES

  1. Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419

  2. American Cancer Society [ACS]. (2021). Comprensión de un diagnóstico de cáncerde seno. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/CRC/PDF/Public/9020.00.pdf

  3. American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO]. (2021). ¿Qué es la sobrevivenciaal cáncer? Retrieved from https://www.cancer.net/es/sobrevivencia/que-es-lasobrevivencia(Date access 17/08/2023)

  4. Arrighi, E., Jovell, A. J., Navarro, M. D., & Font, A. (2014). Desarrollo delcuestionario español para medir necesidades no Cubiertas de Supervivientesde Cáncer (CESC). Psicooncologia, 11(1), 1063-1064. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_psic.2014.v11.n1.44921

  5. Boyes, A. W., Girgis, A., D’Este, C., & Zucca, A. C. (2012). Prevalence andcorrelates of cancer survivors’ supportive care needs 6 months after diagnosis: apopulation-based cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer, 12, 150. Retrieved fromhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/150

  6. Doral-Fábregas, F., Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2018). Modelos deecuaciones estructurales en investigaciones de ciencias sociales: experiencia deuso en Facebook. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, XXIV(1), 22-40.

  7. Escobedo-Portillo, M. T., Hernández Gómez, J. A., Estebané Ortega, V., & MartínezMoreno, G. (2016). Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales: Características,Fases, Construcción, Aplicación y Resultados. Ciencia yTrabajo, 18(55), 16-22.http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-24492016000100004

  8. Fang, S.-Y., Cheng, H.-R., & Lin, C.-Y. (2018). Validation of the modified ChineseCancer Survivor’s Unmet Needs (CaSUN-C) for women with breast cancer.Psycho-Oncology, 27(1), 236-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4499

  9. García Veiga, M. de los Á. (2011). Análisis causal con ecuaciones estructurales de lasatisfacción ciudadana con los servicios municipales. Universidad de Santiagode Compostela.

  10. Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014).Metodología de la Investigación (6th Ed.). Ciudad de México: McGraw Hill.

  11. Hodgkinson, K., Butow, P., Hunt, G. E., Pendlebury, S., Hobbs, K. M., Lo, S. K., &Wain, G. (2007). The development and evaluation of a measure to assess cancersurvivors’ unmet supportive care needs: TheCaSUN (Cancer Survivors’ UnmetNeeds measure). Psycho-Oncology, 16(9), 796-804. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1137

  12. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling:Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business ResearchMethods, 6, 53-60. Retrieved from www.ejbrm.com

  13. Instituto Nacional de Geografía [INEGI]. (2023). Comunicado de prensa núm.77/23: Estadísticas a propósito del día mundial contra el cáncer. DatosNacionales. Retrieved from https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/aproposito/2023/EAP_Cancer.pdf

  14. Keeman, M. C., Bolman, C. A. W., Mesters, I., Willems, R. A., Kanera, I. M., &Lechner, L. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Dutch extended CancerSurvivors’ Unmet Needs measure (CaSUN-NL). European Journal of CancerCare, 27(2), e12807. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12807

  15. Komatsu, H., Yagasaki, K., Sato, Y., Arao, H., Yamamoto, S., & Hayashida, T. (2020).Evaluation of the Japanese Version of the Cancer Survivors’ Unmet NeedsScale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 7(2), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_49_19

  16. Körner, M., Bütof, S., Müller, C., Zimmermann, L., Becker, S., & Bengel, J. (2016).Interprofessional teamwork and team interventions in chronic care: A systematicreview. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1051616

  17. Martínez Arroyo, O., Andreu Vaíllo, Y., Martínez López, P., & Galdón Garrido, M.J. (2019). Emotional distress and unmet supportive care needs in survivors ofbreast cancer beyond the end of primary treatment. Supportive Care in Cancer,27(3), 1049-1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4394-8

  18. Martínez, P., Andreu, Y., & Conchado, A. (2021). Psychometric properties of theSpanish version of the cancer survivors’ unmet needs (CaSUN-S) measurein breast cancer. Psicothema, 33(1), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.146

  19. Martínez-Arias, M. del R., Hernández Lloreda, M. V., & Hernández Lloreda, M.J. (2014). Tests psicológicos y educativos: conceptos básicos, clasificación yconstrucción. In Psicometría (pp. 15-24). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

  20. Miroševič, Š., Selič-Zupančič, P., Prins, J., Homar, V., & Klemenc-Ketiš, Z. (2022).Psychometric properties of the Slovenian version of the Cancer Survivors’Unmet Needs (CaSUN-SL) measure in post-treatment cancer survivors. BMCPsychology, 10(175).https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00878-6

  21. Robalino, P., Vailati, P., & Soto, L. (2021). JASP. A Fresh Way to Do Statistics.Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/2021/11/22/la-version-en-espanol-de-jaspya-esta-en-linea/ (Date access 20/08/2023)

  22. Sánchez, T., Ordóñez, A., Gilar, R., & Castejón, J. L. (2020). Confirmatory factoranalysis of the assessment instrument teacher of the Escuela Politécnica National.In Proceedings of the LACCEI international Multi-conference for Engineering,Education and Technology. Latin American and Caribbean Consortium ofEngineering Institutions. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2020.1.1.110

  23. Simard, S., & Savard, J. (2009). Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory: Developmentand initial validation of a multidimensional measure of fear of cancerrecurrence. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17(3), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0444-y

  24. Summart, U., Sangruangake, M., Songthawat, M., Sangchart, B., Teinprasert, S.T., & Srisuwan, P. (2022). Validation of the Modified Thai Cancer Survivor’sUnmet Needs (T-CaSUN) for Cholangiocarcinoma Patients. Asian PacificJournal of Cancer Prevention, 23(5), 1769-1776. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.5.1769

  25. Vallejo, P. M. (2011). El Análisis Factorial en la construcción e interpretación detests, escalas y cuestionarios.

  26. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2010). Framework for Action on InterprofessionalEducation & Collaborative Practice. Health Professions Networks Nursing& Midwifery Human Resources for Health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-educationcollaborative-practice




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2024;47