medigraphic.com

2024, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2024; 27 (1)

Reimagining old age in Mexico: approaches for a conceptual reviewing of old age in the 21st century

Gallardo EMÁ

Language: Spanish
References: 60
Page: 250-284
PDF size: 238.04 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The conceptualization of old age and aging has undergone a significant evolution over time. Old age, in a contemporary approach, is understood as a multidimensional process that transcends mere chronology, considering biological, psychological, and social factors. This dynamic understanding challenges traditional perceptions associated with the inevitable decline of aging.
Initially, a reflective exposition in carried out regarding old age, aging, and Psychology. Subsequently, a brief historical reflection on the Psychology of Old Age and its evolution in the Mexican context is presented. In a third moment, a systematic literature review is conducted using a search formula centered on variants of “conceptualization of aging”, “critical gerontology” y “psychology of aging”. This search was exclusively conducted on the Google Scholar platform. The results obtained through this search led to a unified conceptual definition of old age, aging, and the category of older adults. This process considered a limited time frame, ranging from 2018 to 2023. The application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in the identification of 19 relevant documents that significantly contributed to the conceptual analysis around old age and aging. As a result, a conceptualization is constructed that can serve as a guide for understanding old age, aging and older adults in the first half of the 21st century. The psychology of old age and critical social gerontology are strategically intertwined to outline a vision of old age that goes beyond conventional stereotypes, recognizing cultural diversity and de active agency of older adults. This conceptual proposal distances itself from simplistic perspectives, highlighting the significance contribution of older adults to society and positioning them as valuable agents whose identity transcends limitations imposed by preconceived models rooted in conventional tradition.


REFERENCES

  1. Albert, N. (2020). “Life Is a Terminal Illness”: The War against Time and Aging inDavid Mitchell’s The Bone Clocks. Hungarian Journal of English andAmerican Studies, 26(1). Recuperado de:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/%E2%80%9CLife-Is-a-Terminal-Illness%E2%80%9D%3A-The-War-against-Time-Albert/a58b3e8963b65a9c85cfee6945434a4e24c644bc

  2. Alvarado García, Alejandra María, y Salazar Maya, Ángela María. (2014). Análisisdel concepto de envejecimiento. Gerokomos, 25(2), 57-62.https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1134-928X2014000200002

  3. Arber, S., y Ginn, J. (1996). Relación entre género y envejecimiento: enfoquesociológico (Vol. 4). Narcea ediciones. Recuperado de:https://books.google.com/books/about/Relación_entre_género_y_envejecimiento.html?hl=esyid=X763UH26qHEC

  4. Ávila, R., N,. (2018). Envejecimiento: Edad, Salud y Sociedad. Horizonte sanitario,17(2), 87-88. Recuperado dehttp://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S2007-74592018000200087ylng=esytlng=es

  5. Bray, J. H. (2010). The future of psychology practice and science. AmericanPsychologist, 65(5), 355–369. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020273

  6. Burema, D. (2022). A critical analysis of the representations of older adults in thefield of human–robot interaction. AI y SOCIETY, 37(2), 455–465. Recuperadode: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-021-01205-0.pdf

  7. Cañoto, Y. (2021). Retos teóricos y epistemológicos de la psicología en el sigloXXI. Nueva Propuesta. Julio. Recuperado de:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353664767_Retos_teoricos_y_epistemologicos_de_la_psicologia_en_el_siglo_XXI_Nueva_Propuesta

  8. Carpintero, C., H. (2021). La Psicología de la Vejez, un tema central en lapsicología española. In ANALES DE LA REAL ACADEMIA DE CIENCIASMORALES Y POLÍTICAS (pp. 375–406). Ministerio de Justicia. Recuperadode:https://www.boe.es/biblioteca_juridica/anuarios_derecho/abrir_pdf.php?id=ANU-M-2021-10037500406

  9. Chazan, M., y Baldwin, M. (2021). Queering generativity and futurity: LGBTQ2IA+stories of resistance, resurgence, and resilience. International Journal ofAgeing and Later Life, 15(1), 73–102. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.1574

  10. Claro, M. V. (2009). ABORDAJE HISTORICO DE LA PSICOLOGIA DE LA VEJEZ.Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 8(3) Recuperado de:http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S1729-519X2009000300002ylng=esytlng=es

  11. Coleman, P. G., y O’Hanlon, A. (2017). Aging and Development: Social andEmotional Perspectives. Taylor y Francis. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726946

  12. CONAPO. (2004). Envejecimiento de la Población de México. Reto del Siglo XXI.In Proyecciones de Población 2000-2030. Recuperado de:http://www.conapo.gob.mx/es/CONAPO/Envejecimiento_de_la_poblacion_de_Mexico__reto_del_Siglo_XXI

  13. Cortese, F., Batz, K., Inkster, I. (2021). Longevity Industry. In: Gu, D., Dupre, M.E.(eds) Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer, Cham.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9_1117

  14. Cox, Harold and Newtson, Richard (1993) "History of Social Gerontology,"Sociological Practice: Vol. 11 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Recuperado de:https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/socprac/vol11/iss1/4

  15. Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course:Cross-Fertilizing Age and Social Science Theory. Journals of Gerontology :Series B, 58(6). S327-S337. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.S327

  16. Díaz-Tendero_Bollain, A. (2011). Estudios de Población y enfoques deGerontología Social en México. Papeles de Población, 17(70), 49–79.Recuperado de:http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S1405-74252011000400004ylng=esytlng=es

  17. Dorman, H. R., Allen, R. S., Parmelee, P. A., y Mcguire, L. C. (2019).SUBJECTIVE APPRAISALS OF PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL HEALTH:EXAMINING THE MEIKIRCH MODEL IN RURAL AND URBANCOMMUNITIES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES. Recuperado de:https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-04555-5_1

  18. Dulcey-Ruiz, E. (2010). Psicología social del envejecimiento y perspectiva deltranscurso de la vida: consideraciones críticas. Revista Colombiana DePsicología, 19(2), 207–224. Recuperado de:https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/804/80415435005.pdf

  19. Facal, D., Gonzalez, R., Lojo-Seoane, C., y Gandoy-Crego, M. (2021). 435 -Innovation and entrepreneurship in gerontology and psychogerontology. TheINVENTHEI project. International Psychogeriatrics, 33(S1), 53-53.doi:10.1017/S1041610221001939

  20. Fernández, D. M. M., Justiniano, Sito, L. M., Díaz, y Romero, A. D. (2021).PSICOLOGÍA EDUCATIVA. Recuperado de:http://fs.unm.edu/PsicologiaEducativa.pdf

  21. Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (2004). Psicología de la vejez. Humanitas, 27–38.Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10486/680041

  22. Ferraro, K. F. (2018). The gerontological imagination: An integrative paradigm ofaging. Oxford University Press. Recuperado de: Pages 996–997,https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny088

  23. Fletcher, D.-J. (2021). Gerontological Hygiene: Emergence and ContemporaryPractice. Age as Disease: Anti-Aging Technologies, Sites and Practices,101–174. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0013-5_3

  24. Fletcher, J. R. (2020). Anti-aging technoscience y the biologization of cumulativeinequality: Affinities in the biopolitics of successful aging. Journal of AgingStudies, 55, 100899. Recuperado de: doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100899.Epub 2020 Oct 21. PMID: 33272453; PMCID: PMC7576313

  25. Galindo, E. (2004). Análisis del desarrollo de la psicología en México hasta 1990:Con una bibliografía in extenso. Psicología Para América Latina, (2)Recuperado de:http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S1870-350X2004000200004ylng=ptytlng=es

  26. Gallop, J. (2018). Sexuality, disability, and aging: Queer temporalities of thephallus. Duke University Press. Recuperado de:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/hypatia/article/sexuality-disabilityand-aging-queer-temporalities-of-the-phallus-jane-gallop-durham-nc-andlondon-duke-university-press-2019-isbn-9781478001614/0B462DC9B4005616DF2923600103EE67

  27. Gilleard, C. (2023). Revisiting the social construction of old age. Ageing andSociety, 1–14. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X23000570

  28. Gilleard, C. J., y Higgs, P. (2014). Ageing, corporeality and embodiment. AnthemPress. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1gxp7gb

  29. Gutiérrez Robledo, L. Mi., Méndez Hernández, M. F., García Chanes, R. E., yGiraldo Rodríguez, M. L. (2020). Desafíos de las políticas sociales para losadultos mayores. In Cofactor Revista (Vol. 9, Issue 17). Recuperado de: doi:10.1007/s12603-019-1251-5. PMID: 31641727

  30. Henríquez, R. Y. (2010). La construcción social de la realidad: la posición de PeterL. Berger y Thomas Luckmann. Ars boni et Aequi, 6(2), 289-304. Recuperadode: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3262960

  31. Hidajat, M. (2022). Lifetime Primary Occupation and Health/Longevity in Old Age.In Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging (pp. 2930–2938).Springer. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9_1089

  32. Hoh, J. W. T., Lu, S., Feng, Q., y Gu, D. (2022). Longevity areas and masslongevity. In Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging (pp. 2975–2986). Springer, Cham. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9_1128

  33. Höppner, G., y Urban, M. (2019). Materialities of age and ageing: Concepts of amaterial gerontology. Frontiers Media SA. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00014

  34. Huenchuan, S. (2018). Envejecimiento, personas mayores y Agenda 2030 para elDesarrollo Sostenible: perspectiva regional y de derechos humanos. In Librosde la CEPAL. Recuperado de:https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/44369/1/S1800629_es.pdf

  35. INEGI. (2021). Censo de población y vivienda 2020. Recuperado de:https://censo2020.mx/

  36. Jill Quadagno. (1999). Aging and the Life Course: An Introduction to SocialGerontology. McGraw-Hill College. Recuperado de:https://archive.org/details/aginglifecoursei0000quad_u1l6

  37. Kapur, R. (2018). Understanding the Significance of Gerontology. Recuperado de:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323779673_Understanding_the_Significance_of_Gerontology

  38. Khoo, Y. M. (2019). Ageing and Globalization. Journal of Gerontological SocialWork, 62(7), 812–815. Recuperado de: DOI:10.1080/01634372.2018.1513432

  39. Krippendorff., K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology.Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

  40. Lamb, S. (2020). Assemblages of Care and Personhood: “Successful Ageing”across India and North America. In C. Brosius y R. Mandoki (Hrsg.), Caringfor Old Age: Perspectives from South Asia. Heidelberg University Publishing.Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.597.c8405

  41. Leal-Mora, M., Flores-Castro, D. ;, Borboa-García, M. ;, y La Geriatría En México,C. (2006). La geriatría en México. Investigación En Salud, VIII3), 185–190.Recuperado de:https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/142/Resumenes/Resumen_14280308_1.pdf

  42. Maldonado-Saucedo, M., Enríquez-Rosas, R., y Camacho-Gutiérrez, E. J. (2019).Vejez y envejecimiento: una aproximación interdisciplinaria (ITESO (ed.)).Recuperado de:https://rei.iteso.mx/bitstream/handle/11117/8545/Vejez%20y%20envejecimiento%20PDF_REI.pdf?sequence=1

  43. Maza Pérez, B. G., y Fernández de Lara López, G. (2022). ENVEJECIMIENTOACTIVO, UN CAMBIO DE PARADIGMA NECESARIO EN MÉXICO: UNAREVISIÓN DE LA LITERATURA CIENTÍFICA. Revista Electrónica dePsicología Iztacala, 25(2 SE-Artículos). Recuperado de:https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/repi/article/view/82927

  44. Meitezen, A., y Falkner, R. P. (1891). History, Theory, and Technique of Statistics.Part First: History of Statistics. The Annals of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social Science, 1, 1–100. Recuperado de:http://www.jstor.org/stable/1008943

  45. Palà, G., y Correa, G. (2020). Participatory Ageing as Assemblage: Infrastructuringin Practice. Tecnoscienza. Italian Journal of Science and Technology Studies,11(2), 33–52. Recuperado de:https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/165107/445-1930-1-PB.pdf?sequence=1

  46. Palma-Ayllón, E., y Escarabajal-Arrieta, M. D. (2021). Efectos de la soledad en lasalud de las personas mayores Effects of loneliness on the health.Gerokomos, 32(1), 22–25. Recuperado de:https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/geroko/v32n1/1134-928X-geroko-32-01-22.pdf

  47. Park, H. W. (2013). Senescence, Growth, and Gerontology in the United States.Journal of the History of Biology, 46(4), 631–667. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-012-9348-2

  48. Piña-Morán, M., Olivo-Viana, M. G., Martínez-Maldonado, M., y Mendoza-Núñez,V. M. (2018). Intervención situacional gerontológica: estrategia para potenciarlos roles sociales de los mayores. Geriatric Intervention: Strategy to Enhancethe Social Roles of the Elderly., 56(55), 1–12. Recuperado de:https://www.redalyc.org/jatsRepo/4577/457754907014/457754907014.pdf

  49. Polidori, M. C., Roller-Wirnsberger, R., y Singler, K. (Eds.). (2018). LearningGeriatric Medicine: A Study Guide for Medical Students. SpringerInternational Publishing. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61997-2

  50. Robledo-Marín, C. A., y Orejuela-Gómez, J. J. (2021). Teorías de la sociología delenvejecimiento y la vejez. Revista Guillermo de Ockham, 18(1), 95–102.Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.4660

  51. Rocha, P. L., Correia, J. A., y Medina, M. T. (2015) A (RE) CONSTRUÇÃO DECONTEXTOS E CULTURAS DA VELHICE E DO ENVELHECIMENTO:ABORDAGENS DA GERONTOLOGIA SOCIAL/CRÍTICA/A (Re)constructionof Contexts/Cultures of Old Age and Ageing: Social/Critical GerontologyApproaches. Trabalho y Educação, 24(2), 57-70. Recuperado de:https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/104570/2/194922.pdf

  52. Schneider, H. (2020). The Aging Queer Body., 25-37. Recuperado de: DOI:10.54465/aspeers.13-04

  53. Soria Romero, Zuriel, y Montoya Arce, Bernardino Jaciel. (2017). Envejecimiento yfactores asociados a la calidad de vida de los adultos mayores en el Estadode México. Papeles de población, 23(93), 59-93. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.22185/24487147.2017.93.022

  54. Southam, T. (2020). 27,000 Sunrises: Everyday Contributions of Grateful andGiving Age 70+ Adults. Fielding Graduate University. Recuperado de: DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.18454.09285

  55. Stambler, I., Milova, E. (2022). Longevity Activism. In: Gu, D., Dupre, M.E. (eds)Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer. Recuperadode: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9_395

  56. Sterman, J. D. (2002). System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for aComplex World. Recuperdo de: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/102741

  57. Vaccarino, O. (2019). Re-Conceptualizing’Successful Aging’from Older Adults’Perspectives Using Public Deliberation. University of Guelph. Recuperado de:https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/83d8c089-29e8-47d0-9c99-85e871c3801f/content

  58. Van-Dijk, T. A. (2017). Análisis Crítico del Discurso. Revista Austral De CienciasSociales, (30), 203–222. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2016.n30-10

  59. Vázquez., P, F. (2004). El envejecimiento en México: el siguiente reto de latransición demográfica. Estudios fronterizos, 5(9), 131-135. Recuperado de:http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S0187-69612004000100006ylng=esytlng=es

  60. Vélez, M. D. C. C. (2008). La historia de la vejez. Ensayos: Revista de la facultadde educación de Albacete, (23), 237-254. Recuperado de:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3003504




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com