medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2024; 46 (3)

Late intussusception of entero-entero anastomosis in gastric bypass: a rare but serious complication in bariatric surgery

Sallaberry Schlesinger, Pascale1,2; Fernández Rodríguez, Vicente1,3; Díaz Fuentes, Leopoldo4
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/118730

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/118730
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/118730

Language: English/Spanish [Versi?n en espa?ol]
References: 14
Page: 187-190
PDF size: 291.67 Kb.


Key words:

gastric bypass, intussusception, small intestine, complication, bariatric surgery.

ABSTRACT

We report an unusual case of late-onset small bowel intussusception in a 43-year-old woman, five years after undergoing gastric bypass surgery. The patient presented with abdominal pain and vomiting, and computed tomography initially suggested internal hernia. However, laparoscopy revealed intussusception at the entero-entero anastomosis, which could not be reduced laparoscopically, so it was decided to convert to laparotomy, successfully reducing the intussusception. Post-gastric bypass intussusception is a rare complication, more prevalent in women, with an unclear etiology. Diagnosis can be challenging due to nonspecific symptoms, highlighting the importance of computed tomography. Surgical treatment is essential, ranging from reduction to bowel resection based on tissue viability. This case emphasizes the need to consider this complication in bariatric patients, even years after surgery.



INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery has emerged as an effective response to the significant increase in the incidence of morbid obesity faced by the Chilean and world population.1 Among the most widely practiced bariatric surgeries is the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.2 Although it is a safe surgery that has demonstrated acceptable complication rates, it is not free of risks. Among the most frequent complications of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are bleeding, leaks, internal hernia, stenosis of the anastomosis, and cholelithiasis.3,4 A very infrequent, equally described, and potentially serious complication is thin loop intussusception.

The therapeutic approach for thin loop intussusception is still under debate, with several alternatives available, from simple loop reduction when the loop is vital to bowel resection to creating a new anastomosis.5,6

The following is the case of a patient with late intussusception of the intestinal loop after gastric bypass who was successfully managed by reducing the invaginated loop without requiring resection.



PRESENTATION OF THE CASE

A 43-year-old female patient with a history of bariatric surgery five years ago, specifically gastric bypass. She was seen at the emergency department for diffuse abdominal pain with a VAS (visual analog scale) 10/10, associated with alimentary vomiting, without blood or other pathological features. She did not have changes in her bowel habits. Physical examination revealed generalized abdominal muscle resistance, pain on deep palpation in the entire abdomen, and diminished hydro aerial sounds.

Laboratory tests were performed without significant pathological findings, highlighting a C-reactive protein < 1 mg/l, a white blood cell count of 9.1 × 103cells/mm3, creatinine 0.6 mg/dl, and normal plasma electrolytes. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast reported findings suggestive of a Petersen-type internal hernia complicated with minimal ascites, without signs of pneumoperitoneum (Figure 1).

Given the above, a surgical resolution was decided.

An exploratory laparoscopy was performed, which showed distension of the loops at the level of the entero-entero anastomosis secondary to intestinal intussusception. The internal hernia suggested in the CT report was ruled out. Reduction of the invaginated loop was not achieved by laparoscopic technique, so it was decided to convert to open supraumbilical mid-laparotomy. In this way, an invaginated distal loop was identified within the entero-entero anastomosis, achieving its reduction with a vital loop (Figure 2). Leaks or other alterations at the level of the anastomosis were ruled out. There were no other findings during surgery. No drainage was left.

During the postoperative period, the patient was managed with analgesic drugs, a progressive food regimen to tolerance, and antibiotic treatment with ceftriaxone and metronidazole. The patient evolved favorably, without pain, walking without inconveniences, with good oral tolerance, and preserved intestinal transit. Given the good evolution, hospital discharge was decided on the third postoperative day.

The patient remained in good condition during the six-month postoperative follow-up, with no pain or any other associated discomfort.



DISCUSSION

Intestinal intussusception after gastric bypass emerges as an infrequent but important complication to consider and must be keep in mind in bariatric surgery using a gastric bypass. According to reports, this complication would have an incidence close to 0.64%.7 It can arise as a late complication in patients with a history of this type of surgery.8 Among the most frequent late complications of gastric bypass, internal hernia, ulcer, and anastomotic stenosis stand out. However, intussusception is so infrequent that most of the studies reporting late complications secondary to gastric bypass do not even mention it.9 In the case presented in this paper, intussusception occurred late, five years after having undergone bariatric surgery.

In terms of epidemiology, the preponderance of intussusception in women stands out, with a remarkably low incidence in the general post-bariatric surgery population. This pattern suggests a possible hormonal component or anatomical predisposition in women that could influence the development of this specific complication in the context of a gastric bypass.7 As stated in the literature, the case presented is a female patient, which could be explained by one of the abovementioned etiological reasons.

Intussusception in the adult population is infrequent and is usually related to an intestinal tumor, inflammatory disease, and Meckel's diverticulum, among others.10 The etiology of intestinal intussusception after gastric bypass is uncertain. Some theories state that it could be related to post-procedure intestinal motility disorders or intra-abdominal trophic changes.8 Another theory is that the brace lines could act as a traction point,11 or that excessive weight loss could decrease the traction of the mesos and leave the intestine more prone to this condition.12 In the case presented, the etiological cause could be due to any of these reasons since the patient fulfills the characteristics of the three reasons presented.

Generally, post-gastric bypass intussusception occurs about entero-entero anastomosis and is characterized by its retrograde nature, which presents additional challenges in its diagnosis5 and management. This complication was just what happened to the patient here presented.

Diagnosis of post-gastric bypass intussusception can be challenging due to the nonspecific clinical presentation and the need for imaging tests to confirm the diagnosis. Recurrent abdominal symptoms, such as pain, nausea, and vomiting, can be attributed to various causes in post-bariatric surgery patients, making early identification of intussusception difficult. In this sense, the CT scan is a fundamental diagnostic tool for visualizing intestinal intussusception and guiding therapeutic planning.5,13 In the case presented, although a CT scan was performed, the report showed a different diagnosis. Hence, the usefulness of the CT scan, particularly in the case presented, is unclear.

In terms of treatment, surgery remains the mainstay to address post-gastric bypass intussusception. Multiple surgical strategies are available, from reduction of the intussusception to intestinal resection with a review of the anastomosis.5 The choice of surgical approach will depend mainly on the vitality of the tissue, and the presence of necrosis or perforation is decisive. The recommendation in a devitalized intestinal loop is resection of the involved segment.14 However, when the invaginated loop is found to be vital after reduction, there are different management alternatives, standing out simple reduction, fixation of the intestinal loop, or intestinal resection. Although intestinal resection can be associated with lower recurrence rates, it is essential to carefully consider the risks and benefits of each therapeutic option in the specific clinical context of the patient.7 In the case presented, given the reduction of the invaginated loop and its vitality, it was decided to perform conservative management without intestinal resection or anastomosis. With this management, the patient evolved favorably. Given the above, it is important to consider the option of conservative management, if the necessary means are available to be able to re-intervene the patient in a timely manner in the event symptoms or signs suggesting a new complication appear.



CONCLUSIONS

Thin-loop intussusception in patients with a history of gastric bypass represents a significant clinical challenge, requiring careful consideration of the available therapeutic options. Understanding this complication and its appropriate management is essential to improve long-term outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Petermann-Rocha F, Martínez-Sanguinetti MA, Villagrán M, Ulloa N, Nazar G, Troncoso-Pantoja C, et al. Desde una mirada global al contexto chileno: ¿Qué factores han repercutido en el desarrollo de obesidad en Chile? (Parte 1). Rev Chil Nutr. 2020; 47: 299-306. doi: 10.4067/S0717-75182020000200299.

  2. Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers, 2011-2017. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Accessed June 29, 2018. Available in: https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers/

  3. Lim R, Beekley A, Johnson DC, Davis KA. Early and late complications of bariatric operation. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018; 3: e000219. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000219.

  4. Kassir R, Debs T, Blanc P, Gugenheim J, Ben Amor I, Boutet C, et al. Complications of bariatric surgery: presentation and emergency management. Int J Surg. 2016; 27: 77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.067.

  5. González-Carreró Sixto C, Baleato-González S, García Palacios JD, Sánchez Bernal S, Junquera Olay S, Bravo González M, et al. Intestinal intussusception in adults: location, causes, symptoms, and therapeutic management. Radiología (Engl Ed). 2023; 65: 213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2022.10.005.

  6. Norero ME, Raddatz EA, Guzman BS. Intususcepción intestinal posterior a bypass gástrico en Y de Roux. Rev Chil Cir. 2010; 62: 175-178.

  7. Oor JE, Goense L, Wiezer MJ, Derksen WJM. Incidence and treatment of intussusception following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021; 17: 1017-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.01.006.

  8. Singla S, Guenthart BA, May L, Gaughan J, Meilahn JE. Intussusception after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: an underrecognized complication. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012; 2012: 464853. doi: 10.1155/2012/464853.

  9. Osland EJ, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon MA. Late (≥ 5 y) Complications of Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022; 32: 501-513. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001065.

  10. Marinis A, Yiallourou A, Samanides L, Dafnios N, Anastasopoulos G, Vassiliou I, et al. Intussusception of the bowel in adults: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15: 407-411.

  11. Coster D, Sundberg S, Kermode D, Beitzel D, Noun S, Severidt M. Small bowel obstruction due to antegrade and retrograde intussusceptions after gastric bypass: three case reports in two patients, literature review, and recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008; 4: 69-72.

  12. Ver Steeg K. Retrograde intussusception following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006; 16: 1101-1103.

  13. Zaigham H, Ekelund M, Lee D, Ekberg O, Regnér S. Intussusception after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: correlation between radiological and operative findings. Obes Surg. 2023; 33: 475-481. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06377-2.

  14. Simper S, Erzinger J, Mckinlay R, Smith S. Retrograde (reverse) jejunal intussusceptions might not be such a rare problem: a single group's experience of 23 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008; 4: 77-83.



AFFILIATIONS

1 Los Andes University, Santiago, Chile.

2 Third-year resident in General Surgery.

3 Undergraduate Medical Intern.

4 General Surgeon, Hospital del Carmen. Maipú, Santiago, Chile.



CORRESPONDENCE

Pascale Sallaberry-Schlesinger. E-mail: pssallaberry@miuandes.cl




Received: 06/04/2024. Accepted: 09/24/2024

Figure 1
Figure 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2024;46