medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Periodontología

ISSN 2007-4360 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 1-3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Periodontol 2023; 14 (1-3)

Gingival phenotype modification in anterior mandibular area using VISTA technique: 12 months follow up

Méndez XG, García AF, Fontes GZ, Gómez FM
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/118773

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/118773
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/118773

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 20-23
PDF size: 323.83 Kb.


Key words:

gingival phenotype, mucogingival surgery, acellular dermal matrix.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: in 1969, Ochsenbein and Ross classified gingival morphology into two types: scalloped, thin, or flat gingiva, and thick gingiva. Additionally, Seibert and Lindhe introduced the term "gingival biotype" to categorize gingiva into "thick-flat" and "thin-scalloped" types. During the World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases, the term biotype was replaced with phenotype, characterized by three-dimensional gingival volume with boundaries at the mucogingival junction and thickness of the vestibular and palatal/lingual bony cortical. External factors, such as overcontoured prosthetic restorations, orthodontic treatments, brushing trauma, or mucogingival procedures, can modify the phenotype. Case description: a 60-year-old female patient presented at the Periodontology Department of the Autonomous University of Baja California with a diagnosis of gingival and periodontal health in a reduced periodontium. The patient was non-periodontal but had primary occlusal trauma with a thickness of 0.8 mm (thin phenotype) and RT1 in tooth. Procedure: a surgical procedure was performed to increase the thickness and width of attached gingiva in the anterior mandibular region. The "VISTA" technique was employed, accompanied by an acellular dermal matrix of porcine origin. Conclusion: modifying gingival conditions in a site with a thin phenotype or prior to treatments such as orthodontics or prosthetics significantly improves outcomes. Healthy gingival tissue provides stability, protection, aesthetics, and function in conjunction with dental restorations or modifications.


REFERENCES

  1. Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13 (7): 654-657.

  2. Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 Suppl 1: S237-S248. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0733. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45 Suppl 20: S219-S229. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12951.

  3. Scheyer ET, Sanz M, Dibart S, Greenwell H, John V, Kim DM, Langer L et al. Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015; 86 (2 Suppl): S73-76.

  4. Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45 Suppl 20: S190-S198.

  5. Goncalves Motta SH, Ferreira CMP, Quintela DC, Santana RB. Relationship between clinical and histologic periodontal biotypes in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017; 37 (5): 737-741. doi: 10.11607/prd.2501.

  6. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Morimoto T, Lozada J. Facial gingival tissue stability after connective tissue graft with single immediate tooth replacement in the esthetic zone: consecutive case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67 (11 Suppl): 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.004.

  7. Gil A, Bakhshalian N, Min S, Zadeh HH. Treatment of multiple recession defects with vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA): a retrospective pilot study utilizing digital analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30 (6): 572-579. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12434.

  8. Baldi C, Pini-Prato G, Pagliaro U, Nieri M, Saletta D, Muzzi L, Cortellini P. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19-case series. J Periodontol. 1999; 70 (9): 1077-1084. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.9.1077.

  9. Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Zucchelli G, Rasperini G, Feinberg SE, Wang HL, Giannobile WV. Extracellular matrix-based scaffolding technologies for periodontal and peri-implant soft tissue regeneration. J Periodontol. 2020; 91 (1): 17-25. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0351.

  10. Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Zucchelli G, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Gingival phenotype modification therapies on natural teeth: a network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2020; 91 (11): 1386-1399. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0715.

  11. Changi KK, Greenstein G, Tarnow D, Royzman D, Kang P. Creeping clinical attachment after acellular dermal matrix augmentation to attain root coverage. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2020; 10 (2): 75-80. doi: 10.1002/cap.10078.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Periodontol. 2023;14