medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
ISSN 0484-7903 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2025; 48 (2)

Ultrasound-guided bilateral brachial plexus block, supraclavicular and infraclavicular approach in upper limb surgery plus ultrasound-guided monitoring of diaphragmatic dynamics. A case report

Sánchez-Ramírez CM, Luna-Medina CI, Olvera-González N, Blanco-de RN
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/119206

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/119206
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/119206

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 111-114
PDF size: 550.19 Kb.


Key words:

bilateral brachial plexus block, infraclavicular and supraclavicular block, regional anesthesia.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: in anesthetic practice, bilateral brachial plexus block (BPB) is generally contraindicated due to the risks it entails, systemic toxicity from local anesthetics and bilateral phrenic nerve palsy. Since its indications are scarce, we present the case of a patient who was managed with bilateral regional anesthesia for both upper limbs at the same surgical time. Case presentation: 60-year-old male patient with diagnoses of Frikman III right distal radius fracture and Mayo III left olecranon fracture, scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the left olecranon and of the right distal radius, history of type 2 diabetes, systemic arterial hypertension and compensated chronic heart failure. Interventions: left supraclavicular and right infraclavicular BPB were performed as the only anesthetic procedure for bilateral upper limb surgery. Results: bilateral BPB was successful for bilateral upper limb surgery. The surgery was uneventful and without major complications. Conclusions: bilateral brachial plexus block is a safe technique when performed in different approaches, trying to minimize the risk of complications, providing better comfort in the immediate postoperative period of the patient by providing prolonged analgesia.


REFERENCES

  1. López-D. Fractura múltiple en miembro superior. Caso clínico. Acta Ortop Mex. 2014;28:54-56.

  2. Kang RA, Chung YH, Ko JS, et al. Reduced hemidiaphragmatic paresis with a "Corner Pocket" technique for supraclavicular brachial plexus block: single-center, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:720-724.

  3. Raid AA. Multiple concomitant injuries in one upper extremity: a case report. Am J Case Rep. 2016;17:6-11. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.894984.

  4. Mejia-Terrazas GE, Garduño-Juárez MA, Limón-Muñoz M, et al. Bloqueo bilateral del plexo braquial. Reporte de casos y revisión sistemática de la literatura. Cirugía y Cirujanos. 2015;83:312-318. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.circir.2015.05.018

  5. Ventura-Pérez CC, Leal-Gudiño L, Luján Ureño-y Prieto I, et al. Bloqueo de plexo braquial infraclavicular ecoguiado comparando dos abordajes: coracoideo versus costoclavicular, evaluación de la evidencia científica. Rev Mex Anest. 2018;41:117-123.

  6. Kim BG, Yang C, Lee K, Choi WJ. Bilateral brachial plexus block in a patient with cervical spinal cord injury: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99:e21126.

  7. Sivashanmugam T, Maurya I, Kumar N, et al. Ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis after a supraclavicular and costoclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomised observer blinded study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019;36:787-795.

  8. Acosta CM, Urbano MS, Tusman G. Estudio sonográfico del diafragma. una nueva herramienta diagnóstica para el anestesiólogo. Rev Chil Anest. 2018;47:110-124. doi: 10.25237/revchilanestv47n02.08.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2025;48