medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Archivos de Medicina de Urgencia de México

ISSN 2594-3006 (Electronic)
ISSN 2007-1752 (Print)
Archivos de Medicina de Urgencia de México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Arch Med Urg Mex 2024; 16 (3)

Incidence and electrocardiographic changes due to electrical burns in adult patients at the ''Dr. Rubén Leñero'' General Hospital

Navari-González C, Díaz-Cruz IW, Cordero-Comparán SA, Ixta-Rojas F, Cartas-Oropeza RV, Salinas OC
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/119318

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/119318
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/119318

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 199-203
PDF size: 327.47 Kb.


Key words:

electrocardiographic alterations, electrical burns, Tpe Interval.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: electrocardiographic abnormalities due to electrical burns occur in a minority of patients but can be serious and fatal.
They usually manifest early, especially in the first 24 to 36 hours, but can sometimes be late and usually occur during high-voltage electrical discharges. For this reason, each patient must be carefully evaluated to establish an appropriate diagnosis and treatment.
Objective: to determine the frequency and type of electrocardiographic alteration associated with electrical burn in adult patients who attended the Dr. Rubén Leñero General Hospital during the period January-December 2022.
Methods: a clinical epidemiological study was carried out with a quantitative, observational, descriptive, analytical, cross-sectional and retrospective approach in patients with electrical burn admitted to the emergency service of the Dr. Rubén Leñero General Hospital with an electrocardiogram upon admission during the period January-December 2022. The risk of ventricular arrhythmias was assessed by calculating the Tpeak-Tend (Tpe) interval, an index used to assess ventricular repolarization.
Results: after applying the selection criteria, we obtained a sample of 40 patients in the period studied, 37 were men and 3 were women. 28 (70%) were reported with sinus rhythm, 5 (13%) sinus bradycardia, 5 (13%) sinus tachycardia, 1 (2%) posterior fascicular block and 1 (2%) with Mc Ginn White complex. It was found that the risk index to evaluate ventricular repolarization by means of the Tpeak-Tend interval was greater than 90 milliseconds with a mean of 96 and SD of 19.77 for direct electric current; mean of 93 and SD of 20.22 for electric arc. The student T is 1.96 with a significance level of 0.05, with no statistically significant difference.
Conclusions: electrocardiographic alterations due to electrical burns are considered to be rare, although there may be a risk of presenting ventricular arrhythmias, with ventricular fibrillation being fatal.


REFERENCES

  1. Baran Karataş, et al. Assessment of electrocardiographic parametersin patients with electrocution injury. Journal of Electrocardiology.

  2. 2015; 48: 809-814.2. Başaran, A, et al. Electrical burns and complications: Data of atertiary burn center intensive care unit, Ulus Trauma Acil CerrahiDerg. 2020; 26 (2): 22-226.

  3. Reza Vaghardoost, MD, et al. Evaluation of Electrical Burn Injuriesin Iran: A 7-Year Retrospective Study. Journal of Burn Care & Research.2021; 43 (1): 104-108.

  4. Spies, C., Richard, G. et al. Annals of Internal Medicine. NarrativeReview: Electrocution and Life-Threatening Electrical Injuries. AnnIntern Med. 2006; 145: 531-537.

  5. Carrillo, R, et al. Síndrome de onda J en paciente con quemadura eléctrica.¿Causalidad o casualidad? Med Int Méx. 2018; 34(2): 327-334.

  6. Barrero, J, et al. Alteraciones electrocardiográficas en quemaduraeléctrica: no todo son taquiarritmias. Acta Colombiana de CuidadoIntensivo. 2021; 21: 183-186.

  7. Vural, A, et al. The importance of electrocardiography in the clinicalcourse of electric injuries. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg.2015; 21(3): 216-9.

  8. Pilecky, D, Vamos, M. et al. Risk of cardiac arrhythmias after electricalaccident: a single-center study of 480 patients. Clinical Researchin Cardiology. 2019; 108: 901–908.

  9. González, L, et al. Fisiopatología de las quemaduras eléctricas;artículo de revisión. Rev. Chil Anest. 2019; 48: 115-122.

  10. Peerzada Umar Farooq Baba, Hafeez, A. Electricity: The enemyinvisible. Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019; 22 (1): e004-e012.

  11. Pilecky, D, et al. Risk of arrhythmias and cardiac complicationsafter electrical injury. 2020; 161(47): 1979-1988.

  12. Rattan, A., Goyal, D. ECG monitoring in high voltage electric injurypatients presenting with normal ECG: ¿Time to revisit practice?Journal of Electrocardiology. 2021; 68: 164-166.

  13. Yenerçağ, M, et al. Evaluation of Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio inmajor burn patients, Journal of Electrocardiology. 2020; 60: 67-71.

  14. Waldmann, V, et al. Electrical cardiac injuries: current concepts andmanagement. European Heart Journal. 2018; 39: 1459–1465.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Arch Med Urg Mex. 2024;16