medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Medicina

ISSN 1561-302X (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev cubana med 2022; 61 (3)

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation in patients admitted to a provisional center for moderate COVID-19 patients

Navarro MVR, Marín BK, Curbelo LM, Kaled SJJ, Peña GY, Armuelles BV
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1-17
PDF size: 463.89 Kb.


Key words:

COVID-19, respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory insufficiency, non-invasive ventilation, hypoxia, oxygen inhalation therapy.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Non-invasive mechanical ventilation is a ventilatory alternative for COVID-19 cases.
Objective: To describe the characteristics and evolution of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) in patients discharged from Provisional Center for moderate COVID-19 patients in Figali, Panama.
Methods: A descriptive, retrospective, longitudinal stu was carried out in all adult patients discharged from June to July 2021 and who received non-invasive mechanical ventilation. A questionnaire was used using the digital individual medical record as primary source. Descriptive statistics techniques were used.
Results: 35.9% of the patients (78/217) who were admitted required non-invasive mechanical ventilation on the ninth day of symptoms and the second day after admission. 62.8% (49/78) were obese and 29.5% (23/78) hypertensive. The respiratory rate ≥30 and the decrease in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio decided the begining of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in 56.4% (78/217) of those admitted. 62.8% (49/78) had moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, and the severity was related to ventilation failure out of the total number of ventilated patients. Ventilation was successful in 65.4% (51/78). PaO2/FiO2 <150 (62.9%), respiratory rate ≥30 (55.6%) and physical exhaustion (51.85%) decided ventilation failure.
Conclusions: Non-invasive mechanical ventilation is an effective procedure in COVID-19 patients and moderate or severe respiratory distress; although its success is related to the less severe forms. Low PaO2/FiO2, together with symptoms, were key indicators to assess the begining, success or failure of NIMV; not so the values of PaO2, PaCO2 and SpO2.


REFERENCES

  1. Winck JC, Ambrosino N. COVID-19 pandemic and non invasive respiratory management: Every Goliath needs a David. An evidence based evaluation of problems. Pulmonol. 2020;26(4):213-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.04.013

  2. Carrillo J, Sánchez Carpintero M, Yordi A, Doblare G, García L, García C, et al. Outcomes of an intermediate respiratory care unit in the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0243968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.02439682.

  3. Radovanovic D, Coppola S, Franceschi E, Gervasoni F, Duscio E, Chiumello DA, et al. Mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 pneumoniatreated with non-invasive respiratory support: A rapid review. Journal of Critical Care. 2021;65:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.05.0073.

  4. Ogawa K, Asano K, Ikeda J, Fujii T. Non-invasive oxygenation strategies for respiratory failure with COVID-19: A concise narrative review of literature in pre and mid-COVID-19 era. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021;40(4):100897. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100897.

  5. Bellani G, Grasselli G, Cecconi M, Antolini L, Borelli M, De Giacomi F, et al. Noninvasive Ventilatory Support of Patients with COVID-19 outside the Intensive Care Units (WARd-COVID). Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(6):1020-26. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202008-1080OC.

  6. Sivaloganathan AA, Nasim-Mohi M, Brown MM, Abdul N, Jackson A, Fletcher SV, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19-associated acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: experience from a single centre. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct; 125(4): e368-e371. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.008

  7. Fu Y, Guan L, Wu W, Yuan J, Zha S, Wen J, et al. Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With COVID-19-Related AcuteHypoxemic Respiratory Failure: ARetrospective Cohort Study. Front. Med. 2021;8:638201. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.638201

  8. Windisch W, Weber Carstens S, Kluge S, Rossaint R, Welte T, Karagiannidis C. Invasive and non-invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117:528-33. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0528

  9. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Panamá. Recomendaciones de atención de pacientes COVID-19 hospitalizados. 4 th ed. Cuidad Panamá: MINSA. 2020 [acceso 14/06/2021]. Disponible en: http://minsa.b-cdn.net/sites/default/files/publicacion-general/recomendaciones_manejo_covid-19_version_4.0_9_de_abril_revisado_digesa_def14_abrildef_0.pdf9.

  10. Menzella F, Barbieri C, Fontana M, Scelfo C, Castagnetti C, Ghidoni G, et al. Effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 related-acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Respir J. 2021;00:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.1336110.

  11. Roca O, Caralt B, Messika J, Samper M, Sztrymf B, Hernández G, et al. An Index Combining Respiratory Rate and Oxygenation to Predict Outcome of Nasal High-Flow Therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;99(11):1368-76. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0589OC

  12. Carrillo A, López A, Carrillo L, Caldeira V, Guía M, Alonso N, et al. Validity of a clinical scale in predicting the failure of non-invasive ventilation in hypoxemic patients. J Crit Care. 2020;60:152-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.08.008

  13. Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA. 2018;319(7):698-710. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.21907

  14. Rubio Rivas M, Corbella X, Mora Luján JM, Loureiro Amigo J, López Sampalo A, Yera Bergua C, et al. Predicting Clinical Outcome with Phenotypic Clusters in COVID-19 Pneumonia: An Analysis of 12,066 Hospitalized Patients from the Spanish Registry SEMI-COVID-19. J Clin Med. 2020;9:3488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm911348814.

  15. Li X, Ma X. Acute respiratory failure in COVID-19: is it »,» ®,® §,§ ­,­ ¹,¹ ²,² ³,³ ß,ß Þ,Þ þ,þ ×,× Ú,Ú ú,ú Û,Û û,û Ù,Ù ù,ù ¨,¨ Ü,Ü ü,ü Ý,Ý ý,ý ¥,¥ ÿ,ÿ ¶,¶ typical »,» ®,® §,§ ­,­ ¹,¹ ²,² ³,³ ß,ß Þ,Þ þ,þ ×,× Ú,Ú ú,ú Û,Û û,û Ù,Ù ù,ù ¨,¨ Ü,Ü ü,ü Ý,Ý ý,ý ¥,¥ ÿ,ÿ ¶,¶ ARDS? Crit Care. 2020;24(1):198. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02911-9

  16. Machado C, González Quevedo A. Hypoximia and cytokine storms in COVID-19: clinical implications. MEDICC Rev. 2021;23(3):54-9. DOI: 10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.10

  17. Siddiqi HK, Mehra MR. COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: A clinical-therapeutic staging proposal. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39(5):405-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.012.

  18. Zheng R, Hu M, Li R. Respiratory treatment procedures in patients with severe novel coronavirus infected pneumonia: an expert opinion. Chin J Crit Care Intensive Care Med. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2020.000418. .

  19. Xie J, Covassin N, Fan Z, Singh P, Gao W, Li G, et al. Association Between Hypoxemia and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(6):1138-47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.00619.

  20. Shenoy N, Luchtel R, Gulani P. Considerations for target oxygen saturationin COVID-19 patients: are we undershooting? BMC Medicine. 2020;18:260. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01735-2

  21. Barrot L, Asfar P, Mauny F, Winiszewski H, Montini F, Badie J, et al. Liberal or Conservative Oxygen Therapy for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(11):999-1008. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916431.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev cubana med. 2022;61