Calderon I, Alvitez-Temoche D, Espinoza-Carhuancho F, Mendoza R, Mauricio F, Mayta-Tovalino F

Language: English
References: 17
Page: 38-45
PDF size: 416.74 Kb.

ABSTRACT

This case report describes the clinical and therapeutic approach used in a 32-year-old female patient with a tooth fracture in tooth 22. The patient, with no history of systemic disease, presented with a chronic periapical lesion and a cervical fracture in the affected tooth. Treatment included atraumatic extraction of the tooth, followed by placement of a 3.75 x 10mm post-extraction implant with immediate loading and guided bone regeneration. The minimally invasive surgical technique was employed using the Dentoflex^® drilling sequence. The primary stability of the implant, measured in 37 Newtons of torque, allowed the placement of a prefabricated metal abutment for the subsequent cemented crown. Bone regeneration of the interimplant space was successfully performed, supplemented by connective grafting due to the patient's thin gingival phenotype. Postoperative follow-up, including controls at 7, 14 days and four months, showed a satisfactory conformation of the gingival margin and papillary tissue, consolidating the success of the treatment.

REFERENCES

1. Jayesh R.S., Dhinakarsamy V. Osseointegration.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015; 7 (1):S226-9.

2. Ahamed M.S., Mundada B.P., Paul P., RecheA. Partial Extraction Therapy for ImplantPlacement: A Newer Approach in ImplantologyPractice. Cureus. 2022; 14 (11): e31414.

3. Cha H.S., Kim J.W., Hwang J.H., Ahn K.M.Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery.Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 38(1): 19.

4. Zhao R., Yang R., Cooper P.R., Khurshid Z.,Shavandi A., Ratnayake J. Bone Grafts andSubstitutes in Dentistry: A Review of CurrentTrends and Developments. Molecules. 2021;26 (10): 3007.

5. Haugen H.J., Lyngstadaas S.P., Rossi F.,Perale G. Bone grafts: which is the idealbiomaterial? J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46Suppl 21: 92-102.

6. Girón J., Kerstner E., Medeiros T., OliveiraL., Machado G.M., Malfatti C.F., Pranke P.Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedicand dentistry overview. Braz J MedBiol Res. 2021; 54 (9): e11055.

7. Solakoglu Ö., Heydecke G., Amiri N., AnituaE. The use of plasma rich in growth factors(PRGF) in guided tissue regeneration andguided bone regeneration. A review of histological,immunohistochemical, histomorphometrical,radiological and clinical results inhumans. Ann Anat. 2020; 231: 151528.

8. Kang M., Huang C.C., Lu Y., Shirazi S.,Gajendrareddy P., Ravindran S., Cooper L.F.Bone regeneration is mediated by macrophageextracellular vesicles. Bone. 2020; 141:115627.

9. Thoma D.S., Buranawat B., Hämmerle C.H.,Held U., Jung R.E. Efficacy of soft tissueaugmentation around dental implants andin partially edentulous areas: a systematicreview. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 Suppl15: S77-91.

10. Roccuzzo M., Grasso G., Dalmasso P. Keratinizedmucosa around implants in partiallyedentulous posterior mandible: 10-yearresults of a prospective comparative study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 ; 27 (4): 491-6.

11. Thoma D.S., Naenni N., Figuero E.,Hämmerle C.H.F., Schwarz F., Jung R.E.,Sanz-Sánchez I. Effects of soft tissueaugmentation procedures on peri-implanthealth or disease: A systematic review andmeta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 15: 32-49.

12. Buyukozdemir Askin S., Berker E., AkincibayH., Uysal S., Erman B., Tezcan İ.,Karabulut E. Necessity of keratinized tissuesfor dental implants: a clinical, immunological,and radiographic study. Clin ImplantDent Relat Res. 2015; 17 (1): 1-12.

13. Tani C., Carli L., Vagnani S., Talarico R.,Baldini C., Mosca M., Bombardieri S. Thediagnosis and classification of mixed connectivetissue disease. J Autoimmun. 2014;48-49: 46-9.

14. Gunnarsson R., El-Hage F., Aaløkken T.M.,Reiseter S., Lund M.B., Garen T.; NorwegianMCTD study group; Molberg Ø. Associationsbetween anti-Ro52 antibodies and lungfibrosis in mixed connective tissue disease.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016; 55 (1): 103-8.

15. Zucchelli G., Tavelli L., McGuire M.K.,Rasperini G., Feinberg S.E., Wang H.L.,Giannobile W.V. Autogenous soft tissuegrafting for periodontal and peri-implantplastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol.2020; 91 (1): 9-16.

16. de Resende D.R.B., Greghi S.L.A., SiqueiraA.F., Benfatti C.A.M., Damante C.A.,Ragghianti Zangrando M.S. Acellular dermalmatrix allograft versus free gingival graft:a histological evaluation and split-mouthrandomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig.2019; 23 (2): 539-550.

17. Lim H.C., An S.C., Lee D.W. A retrospectivecomparison of three modalities for vestibuloplastyin the posterior mandible: apicallypositioned flap only vs. free gingival graft vs.collagen matrix. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22(5): 2121-2128.