medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)

2022, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2022; 35 (4)

The smartphone in ophthalmology imaging and its application in learning

Torres GO, Rodríguez RBN, Fernández GY, Queupumil RA, Hernández RMÁ

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 1-11
PDF size: 328.02 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Imaging is part of the backbone in medicine and it reaches its peak in Ophthalmology. The importance of ocular photography ranges from recording specific medical conditions, tracking disease progression, and creating illustrations for publication and teaching; in short, an indispensable tool for diagnosis. The attachments, which we show in the present publication, are the result of a development research that was carried out at the Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology "Ramón Pando Ferrer" during the year 2021 with the aim of creating attachments that, coupled to smartphones, allow taking images in the area of Ophthalmology using 3D printing technology. Initially we identified the places that allow creating images in the specialty with an attachment and the smartphone, then we will proceed to design the attachments according to the characteristics of the place where they will be used and finally we show the usefulness of the designed prototypes in the teaching practice.


REFERENCES

  1. Martínez-Asanza D. Acerca de la educación en el trabajo, principio rector de la educación médica cubana. FEM. 2021;24:325. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/fem.246.11581.

  2. Seidel MS, Ball JW, Dains JE, Flynn JA, Solomon BS, Stewart R W. Manual Mosby de exploración física. 7ma edición. Madrid, España: Elsevier; 2014. P. 886.

  3. Chávez I. Aspiración a un nuevo humanismo: grandeza y miseria de la especialización médica. Colegio Nacional. 1ra edición. 2017. ISBN 9786077242352. https://revistas.ues.edu.sv/index.php/launiversidad/article/download/1346/12723.

  4. Rio Torres M, Capote Cabrera A, Hernández Silva JR, Eguías Martínez F, Padilla González CM. Oftalmología. Criterios y tendencias actuales. 2nda edición. La Habana, Cuba: Ciencias Médicas; 2009. 911p. http://www.bvs.sld.cu/libros/oftalmologia_criterios/indice_p.htm4.

  5. Alward WLM, Longmuir RA. Color Atlas of Gonioscopy. 2nda edición. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2008. 128 p. https://www.aao.org/disease-review/color-atlas-of-gonioscopy5.

  6. MINSAP. Reglamento de régimen de residencia en ciencias de la salud. Legislación académica de Cuba; 2020. http://instituciones.sld.cu/ucmh/files/2019/10/minsap-res-108-2004-reglamento-del-regimen-de-la-residencia.pdf6.

  7. Menezo Rozalén JL, España Gregori E. Técnicas exploratorias en oftalmología. 1era edición. Barcelona, España: Espaxs; 2006. 526 p. https://www.oftalmologos.org.ar/catalogo/items/show/36177.

  8. García A. La cirugía experimental oftalmológica para formar especialistas en el marco de la Misión Milagro. Rev Med Electron. 2009[acceso 20/09/2021];31(2). http://revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/590 8.

  9. Yolcu U, Faruk Sahin O, C. Gundogan F. Imaging in Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology - Current Clinical and Research Updates. Pinakin Davey. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/583149.

  10. Fajardo Ortiz G, Robledo H. Gestión de la atención médica, herramienta fundamental para los médicos residentes. Cirugía y cirujanos. 2018;86(1):71-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org//dx.doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.M1800000510.

  11. Daniel B, Moore M. Not a Cheap Investment: Estimating the Cost of the 2017 to 2018 Ophthalmology Residency Match to the Applicant and Program. J Acad Ophthalmol. 2018;10(1):e158-e62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-167584611.

  12. Ferrara M, Romano V, Steel DH, Gupta R, Iovino C, Van Dijk EHC. Reshaping ophthalmology training after COVID-19 pandemic. Eye (Lond). 2020;34(11):2089-97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-1061-312.

  13. Choonara YE, du Toit LC, Kumar P, Kondiah PPD, Pillay V. 3D-printing and the effect on medical costs: a new era? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(1):23-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2016.113886013.

  14. Ryan ME, Prathiba V, Anjana RM, Ranjani H, Venkat Narayan KM, Olsen TW, et al. Comparison Among Methods of Retinopathy Assessment CAMRA Study. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(10):2038-43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/2Fj.ophtha.2015.06.01114.

  15. David ZY Ch, Clement WT T. Smartphone Imaging in Ophthalmology: A Comparison with Traditional Methods on the Reproducibility and Usability for Anterior Segment Imaging. Annals Academy of Medicine. 2016;[acceso 20/09/2021]45(1):6-11. https://www.annals.edu.sg/pdf/45VolNo1Jan2016/MemberOnly/V45N1p6.pdf 15.

  16. Raju B, Raju NSB, Raju A, Sudhakaran CP, Abdul R. Digital video recording and achiving in opthalmic surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006;54(1):53-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.2161916.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com