medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3119 (Electronic)

2022, Number 3

Next >>

Rev Cubana Pediatr 2022; 94 (3)

Non-technical skills in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Cortina CAM, Peña QOE

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 1-14
PDF size: 495.99 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cardiorespiratory arrest can be reversed with resuscitation measures in less than 20% of cases, if it is attended by a team trained in the pediatric advanced life support course. Despite the massive implementation of this training and technical updates, survival has not improved in the last decade. The learning of non-technical skills is one of the topics to be deepened as a strategy to improve survival.
Objective: To examine the available evidence on the perception of course participants as a training scenario for non-technical skills.
Methods: A literature review was conducted between October 2020 and May 2021. The terms used in non-technical skills were identified, they became MeSH terms. It was conducted an advanced search of the PUBMED and ERIC databases.
Analysis and synthesis of information: 11 articles that describe the perceptions of doctors, pediatricians and nurses about the characteristics of an effective leader, factors that influence coordinated teamwork, the importance of effective communication and having an adequate awareness of the situation in different resuscitation scenarios such as trauma, emergencies and critical care were reviewed; and, the recommendations of the participants on simulation as a learning tool of these skills.
Conclusions: Non-technical skills grouped in the categories of leadership, communication, teamwork and situational awareness, are perceived as a fundamental pillar in the functioning and outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.


REFERENCES

  1. Association AH. Dinámica de equipo de reanimación eficaz. In: American Heart Association, editor. Pediatric Advanced Life Support. 5th ed. Dallas; 2020. p. 105-11.

  2. Holmberg MJ, Wiberg S, Ross CE, Kleinman M, Hoeyer-Nielsen AK, Donnino MW, et al. Trends in Survival After Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States.1Circulation. 2019 [acceso 20/08/2021];140(17):1398-408. Disponible en: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.0416672.

  3. Van de Voorde P, Turner NM, Djakow J, de Lucas N, Martinez-Mejias A, Biarent D, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Paediatric Life Support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:327-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.0153.

  4. Flin R, Patey R, Glavin R, Maran N. Anaesthetists non-technical skills. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(1):38-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq1344.

  5. Howard SK, Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Yang G, Sarnquist FH. Anesthesia crisis resource management training: teaching anesthesiologists to handle critical incidents. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1992 [acceso 13/08/2021];63(9):763-70. PMID: 1524531. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15245315.

  6. Saravana-Bawan BB, Fulton C, Riley B, Katulka J, King S, Paton-Gay D, et al. Evaluating Best Methods for Crisis Resource Management Education. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2019 [acceso 12/08/2021];14(6):366-71. DOI: http://www.lww.com/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000388.6.

  7. Matiz S, Ariza C, Santander D. Basic pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation-practical implementation of 2010 guidelines. Rev Colomb Cardiol. 2014;21(6):419-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rccar.2014.06.0047.

  8. León A, Cañedo R. El MeSH: Una herramienta clave para la búsqueda de información en la base de datos Medline. Acimed. 2005 [acceso 15/08/2021];13(2):1-15. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1024-94352005000200006&lng=es8.

  9. Sachedina AK, Blissett S, Remtulla A, Sridhar K, Morrison D. Preparing the Next Generation of Code Blue Leaders Through Simulation: What's Missing? Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2019;14(2):77-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.00000000000003439.

  10. Navalpotro-Pascual S, Blanco-Blanco Á, Torre-Puente JC. Experience of emergency healthcare professionals in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and its relationship with self-efficacy: A qualitative approach. Enferm Clin. 2019;29(3):155-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.09.00810.

  11. Burke RV., Demeter NE, Goodhue CJ, Roesly H, Rake A, Young LC, et al. Qualitative assessment of simulation-based training for pediatric trauma resuscitation. Surg (United States). 2017;161(5):1357-66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.02311.

  12. Halls A, Kanagasundaram M, Lau-Walker M, Diack H, Bettles S. Using in situ simulation to improve care of the acutely ill patient by enhancing interprofessional working: a qualitative proof of concept study in primary care in England. BMJ Open. 2019 [acceso 12/08/2021];9(7):e028572. Disponible en: https://www.bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-02857212.

  13. Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH. Emergency department workplace interruptions: Are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"? Acad Emerg Med. 2000 [acceso 20/08/2021];7(11):1239-43. Disponible en: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00469.x13.

  14. Sak-Dankosky N, Andruszkiewicz P, Sherwood PR, Kvist T. Health care professionals' concerns regarding in-hospital family-witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation implementation into clinical practice. Nurs Critic Care. 2018 [acceso 12/08/2021];23(3):134-40. Disponible en: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nicc.1229414.

  15. Lee MR, Cha C. Emergency department nurses' experience of performing CPR in South Korea. Internat. Emerg Nurs. 2018;38:29-33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2017.09.00815.

  16. Calder LA, Bhandari A, Mastoras G, Day K, Momtahan K, Falconer M, et al. Healthcare providers' perceptions of a situational awareness display for emergency department resuscitation: a simulation qualitative study. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2018;30(1):16-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx15916.

  17. Wehbe-Janek H, Lenzmeier CR, Ogden PE, Lambden MP, Sanford P, Herrick J, et al. Nurses'perceptions of simulation-based interprofessional training program for rapid response and code blue events. J Nurs Care Qual. 2012;27(1):43-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3182303c9517.

  18. Rød I, Kynø NM, Solevåg AL. From simulation room to clinical practice: Postgraduate neonatal nursing students' transfer of learning from in-situ resuscitation simulation with interprofessional team to clinical practice. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021;52:102994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.10299418.

  19. Murphy M, McCloughen A, Curtis K. The impact of simulated multidisciplinary Trauma Team Training on team performance: A qualitative study. Australas Emerg Care. 2019;22(1):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2018.11.00319.

  20. Murphy M, Curtis K, Lam MK, Palmer CS, Hsu J, McCloughen A. Simulation-based multidisciplinary team training decreases time to critical operations for trauma patients. Injury. 2018;49(5):953-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.00920.

  21. Dewolf P, Clarebout G, Wauters L. The Effect of Teaching Nontechnical Skills in Advanced Life Support: A Systematic Review. Santen S, editor. AEM Educ Train. 2021 [acceso 25/08/2021];5(3):1-20. Disponible en: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.1052221.

  22. Carne B, Kennedy M, Gray T. Review article: Crisis resource management in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Australas. 2012 [acceso 26/08/2021];24(1):7-13. Disponible en: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01495.x22.

  23. van Schaik S, Plant J, O'Brien B. Challenges of interprofessional team training: A qualitative analysis of residents' perceptions. Educ Heal. 2015;28(1):52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.16188323.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com