2025, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Acta Med 2025; 23 (3)
Physiological variables in patients undergoing endoscopy under sedation with fentanyl compared with remifentanil
Rodríguez CBC, Rusz ACI
Language: Spanish
References: 42
Page: 231-237
PDF size: 236.17 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: sedation and analgesia are essential in endoscopic procedures, but it is crucial to consider the cardiovascular effects of the agents used. Appropriate agent selection and ongoing monitoring are key to ensuring patient safety and a successful recovery.
Objective: to identify changes in the hemodynamic status of the patient undergoing endoscopic procedure under sedation-analgesia with remifentanil compared to fentanyl.
Material and methods: an observational, analytical, retrospective study was carried out on patients who underwent an endoscopic procedure under sedation-analgesia with remifentanil or fentanyl in the period January 2021 to December 2022. Information of interest was extracted, including Ramsay blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation before sedation and subsequent until discharge. A descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: 121 patients were included, of which 28 received remifentanil, and 92 received fentanyl to provide sedation for colonoscopy and panendoscopy. Blood pressure was significantly lower in those who received remifentanil than in those who received fentanyl at 5 minutes after administration-no other significant differences. The incidence of hypotension in group R was 7.1%, and in group F was 2.2% (p = 0.436). At the same time, the incidence of hypertension during the procedure was 3.6% in group R and 3.6% in group F (p = 0.468).
Conclusion: remifentanil and fentanyl presented a similar profile of sedative efficacy and safety.
REFERENCES
Mougenot JF, Faure C, Goulet O. Endoscopia digestiva. EMC-Pediatría. 2001; 36 (3): 1-24.
Achord JL, Muthusamy VR. The history of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clinical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2019, pp. 2-11.
Flóres LS, Villalobos DC, Rodríguez R, López KC, González LG, Debrot LM et al. Endoscopia digestiva superior en pediatría. Colombia Médica. 2005; 36 (2): 42-51.
Gómez RN, Rodríguez MF, Rojas SA, Alonso MJ, Pérez BJ, Jaymes NA et al. Anestesia para endoscopía digestiva en el paciente cardiópata isquémico. Rev Mex Anest. 2013; 36 (4): 257-274.
Nay MA, Fromont L, Eugene A, Marcueyz JL, Mfam WS, Baert O et al. High-flow nasal oxygenation or standard oxygenation for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation in patients at risk of hypoxaemia: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (ODEPHI trial). Br J Anaesth. 2021; 127 (1): 133-142.
Hendrickx JF, Eger EI 2nd, Sonner JM, Shafer SL. Is synergy the rule? A review of anesthetic interactions producing hypnosis and immobility. Anesth Analg. 2008; 107 (2): 494-506.
Tallarida RJ. An overview of drug combination analysis with isobolograms. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006; 319 (1): 1-7.
Pardo E, Velut G, Tricot C. Anestesia para endoscopia digestiva. EMC-anestesia-reanimación. 2022; 48 (4): 1-14.
Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Cohen NH, Young WL. Miller's anesthesia. 2014.
James A, Williams J. Basic opioid pharmacology - an update. Br J Pain. 2020; 14 (2): 115-121.
Ghelardini C, Di Cesare Mannelli L, Bianchi E. The pharmacological basis of opioids. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2015; 12(3): 219-221.
Baek J, Park SJ, Kim JO, Kim M, Kim DY, Choi EK. The effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on emergence agitation in pediatric strabismus surgery. Children. 2022; 9: 606.
Koolen SL, Van der Rijt CC. Is there a role for pharmacogenetics in the dosing of fentanyl? Pharmacogenomics. 2017; 18 (5): 417-419.
Ziesenitz VC, Vaughns JD, Koch G, Mikus G, van den Anker JN. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and its derivatives in children: a comprehensive review. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018; 57 (2): 125-149.
Freeman LM, Bloemenkamp KW, Franssen MT, Papatsonis DN, Hajenius PJ, Hollmann MW et al. Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus epidural analgesia in labour: randomised multicentre equivalence trial. BMJ. 2015; 350: h846.
Cascone S, Lamberti G, Piazza O, Abbiati RA, Manca D. A physiologically-based model to predict individual pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018; 111: 20-28.
Barends CRM, Driesens MK, van Amsterdam K, Struys MMRF, Absalom AR. Moderate-to-deep sedation using target-controlled infusions of propofol and remifentanil: adverse events and risk factors: a retrospective cohort study of 2937 procedures. Anesth Analg. 2020; 131 (4): 1173-1183.
Bateman BT, Schumacher HC, Wang S, Shaefi S, Berman MF. Perioperative acute ischemic stroke in noncardiac and nonvascular surgery: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2009; 110 (2): 231-238.
Asakura A, Mihara T, Goto T. Does fentanyl or remifentanil provide better postoperative recovery after laparoscopic surgery? a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology. 2018; 18 (1): 81.
Aoki Y, Niwa T, Shiko Y, Kawasaki Y, Mimuro S, Doi M et al. Remifentanil provides an increased proportion of time under light sedation than fentanyl when combined with dexmedetomidine for mechanical ventilation. J Int Med Res. 2021; 49 (3): 3000605211002683.
Maurel V, Legrand M, Bourgeois E, Masse AL, Bergeron A, Binakdane F et al. Sedation with remifentanil or propofol for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020; 37 (4): 333-334.
Choi JW, Joo JD, Kim DW, In JH, Kwon SY, Seo K et al. Comparison of an intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics, sedation quality, and postoperative pain control. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31 (9): 1485-1490.
Tang ZH, Chen Q, Wang X, Su N, Xia Z, Wang Y et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for awake fiberoptic endoscope intubation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100 (14): e25324.
Urfali S, AKKUR B. Efficiency of propofol co-administered with remifentanil and fentanyl over laryngeal mask airway insertion. Farmacia. 2017; 65 (3): 472-478.
Hino H, Matsuura T, Kihara Y, Tsujikawa S, Mori T, Nishikawa K. Comparison between hemodynamic effects of propofol and thiopental during general anesthesia induction with remifentanil infusion: a double-blind, age-stratified, randomized study. J Anesth. 2019; 33 (4): 509-515.
Van Waes JA, van Klei WA, Wijeysundera DN, van Wolfswinkel L, Lindsay TF, Beattie WS. Association between intraoperative hypotension and myocardial injury after vascular surgery. Anesthesiology. 2016; 124 (1): 35-44.
Watcha MF, White PF. Economics of anesthetic practice. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86 (5): 1170-1196.
Muñoz-Fuentes D, Cabello-Montes JA, Herrera-Servin MA, Zavala-Castillo Julio C. Endoscopy anesthesia, team perspective. Rev Med Hosp Gen Méx. 2021; 84 (3): 116-122.
Amri P, Nahrini S, Hajian-Tilaki K, Hamidian M, Alipour SF, Hamidi SH et al. Analgesic effect and hemodynamic changes due to dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl during elective colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2018; 8 (6): e81077.
Gluud LL. Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163 (6): 493-501.
Mitra-Majumdar M, Kesselheim AS. Reporting bias in clinical trials: progress toward transparency and next steps. PLoS Med. 2022; 19 (1): e1003894.
Obadina D, Haider H, Micic D, Sakuraba A. Older age at first screening colonoscopy is associated with an increased risk of colorectal adenomas and cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023; 57 (8): 804-809.
Muellejans B, López A, Cross MH, Bonome C, Morrison L, Kirkham AJ. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial [ISRCTN43755713]. Crit Care. 2004; 8 (1): R1-R11.
Sanli M, Ucar M. Comparison of the effects of adding fentanyl or remifentanil to propofol in colonoscopy sedoanalgesia on visual analog scale and recovery: a prospective double-blind study. Ann Med Res. 2019; 26 (3): 495-498.
Balakrishnan G, Raudzens P, Samra SK, Song K, Boening JA, Bosek V et al. A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesions. Anesth Analg. 2000; 91 (1): 163-169.
Choi SH, Koo BN, Nam SH, Lee SJ, Kim KJ, Kil HK et al. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl for postoperative pain control after abdominal hysterectomy. Yonsei Med J. 2008; 49 (2): 204-210.
Lee SK, Jeong MA, Sung JM, Yeon HJ, Chang JH, Lim H. Effect of remifentanil infusion on the hemodynamic response during induction of anesthesia in hypertensive and normotensive patients: a prospective observational study. J Int Med Res. 2019; 47 (12): 6254-6267.
Yoon JY, Park CG, Kim EJ, Choi BM, Yoon JU, Kim YH et al. Optimal effect-site concentration of remifentanil to prevent hemodynamic changes during nasotracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020; 20 (4): 195-202.
Kazmaier S, Hanekop GG, Buhre W, Weyland A, Busch T, Radke OC et al. Myocardial consequences of remifentanil in patients with coronary artery disease. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 84 (5): 578-583.
Hormati A, Mohammadbeigi A, Mousavi SM, Saeidi M, Shafiee H, Aminnejad R. Anesthesia related complications of gastrointestinal endoscopies; a retrospective descriptive study. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2019; 11 (3): 147-151.
Zhang C, Huang D, Zeng W, Ma J, Li P, Jian Q et al. Effect of additional equipotent fentanyl or sufentanil administration on recovery profiles during propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022; 22 (1): 127.
Chi X, Chen Y, Liao M, Cao F, Tian Y, Wang X. Comparative cost analysis of three different anesthesia methods in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Front Med. 2012; 6 (3): 311-316.