medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía de Columna

ISSN 2992-7749 (Electronic)
ISSN 2992-7897 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de difusión científica de la Asociación Mexicana de Cirujanos de Columna A. C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Políticas
    • Políticas éticas
    • Políticas de acceso abierto
    • Políticas de revisión de manuscritos
    • Políticas editoriales generales
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Columna 2025; 3 (3)

Effect of erector spinae plane block versus surgical site infiltration on postoperative pain and rescue analgesia in patients undergoing laminectomy

Chavira CL, Castañeda MM, Félix LPM, Piña RJF
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/120091

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/120091
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/120091

Language: Spanish
References: 51
Page: 167-175
PDF size: 228.47 Kb.


Key words:

erector spinae block, conventional analgesia, intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain, rescue analgesia, laminectomy.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: laminectomy is a surgical procedure commonly performed to relieve symptoms associated with spinal stenosis or other spinal conditions that cause compression of the spinal cord or nerve roots. Currently, it is unknown whether the erector spinae plane block is superior to surgical site infiltration in managing postoperative pain and reducing the need for rescue analgesia in patients undergoing laminectomy. Objective: to compare the effect of the erector spinae plane block versus surgical site infiltration on postoperative pain and rescue analgesia in patients undergoing laminectomy. Material and methods: a randomized, single-blind clinical trial was conducted on patients scheduled for laminectomy at the General Hospital of Mexicali from December 2024 to March 2025. After approval of the protocol by the Research Ethics Committee, patients of both sexes scheduled for laminectomy were invited to participate. Those who agreed signed the informed consent and were randomly assigned to the study groups. Patients in Group B received an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with ropivacaine 3.75% (20 mL on each side of the targeted vertebral level), while those in Group I received surgical site infiltration with ropivacaine 7.5% in a volume of 20 mL. Postoperative pain scores (at recovery, 8, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively) and rescue buprenorphine doses within the first 24 hours postoperatively were compared between groups. A descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.26. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: the group receiving the erector spinae plane block showed lower pain levels at recovery (2 vs. 5, p = 0.008), at eight hours (2 vs. 6, p < 0.001), 16 hours (3 vs. 8, p < 0.001), and 24 hours (3 vs. 6, p = 0.006). Additionally, they required less rescue analgesia with buprenorphine (25% vs. 100%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: the erector spinae plane block provides better postoperative pain control and reduces the need for rescue analgesia compared to surgical site infiltration in patients undergoing laminectomy.


REFERENCES

  1. Nagamoto Y, Iwasaki M. Surgical indications and choice of surgical procedure for cervical ossification of the longitudinal ligament. En: OPLL. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2020. p. 167-174.

  2. Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, et al. Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 1424-1434.

  3. Li Z, Yu G, Jiang S, Hu L, Li W. Robot-assisted laminectomy in spinal surgery: a systematic review. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9: 715.

  4. Malik SH, Saleem H, Ashfaq AD, Malik IH, Batool F, Siddique K. General anaesthesia versus regional anaesthesia for lumbar laminectomy: a review of the modern literature. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020; 32: 400-404.

  5. Ye XF, Wang S, Wu AM, Xie LZ, Wang XY, Chen JX, et al. Comparison of the effects of general and local anesthesia in lumbar interlaminar endoscopic surgery. Ann Palliat Med. 2020; 9: 1103-1108.

  6. Sekerak R, Mostafa E, Morris MT, Nessim A, Vira A, Sharan A. Comparative outcome analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in lumbar fusion surgery. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 13: 122-126.

  7. Vázquez RN, Caballero DMP, Pérez CLR. Anesthesia: its advantages and risks for human health. Int J Health Sci. 2019; 3: 1-10.

  8. Brown EN, Pavone KJ, Naranjo M. Multimodal general anesthesia: theory and practice. Anesth Analg. 2018; 127: 1246-1258.

  9. Pavel MA, Petersen EN, Wang H, Lerner RA, Hansen SB. Studies on the mechanism of general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117: 13757-13766.

  10. Egan TD. Are opioids indispensable for general anaesthesia? Br J Anaesth. 2019; 122: e127-e135.

  11. Eger EI 2nd. Characteristics of anesthetic agents used for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004; 61: S3-S10.

  12. Santa-Cruz-Mercado LA, Liu R, Bharadwaj KM, Johnson JJ, Gutierrez R, Das P, et al. Association of intraoperative opioid administration with postoperative pain and opioid use. JAMA Surgery. 2023; 158: 854-864.

  13. Shanthanna H, Ladha KS, Kehlet H, Joshi GP. Perioperative opioid administration: a critical review of opioid-free versus opioid-sparing approaches. Anesthesiology. 2021; 134: 645-659.

  14. Ramos-Matos CF, Bistas KG, Lopez-Ojeda W. Fentanyl. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.

  15. Armenian P, Vo KT, Barr-Walker J, Lynch KL. Fentanyl, fentanyl analogs and novel synthetic opioids: a comprehensive review. Neuropharmacology. 2018; 134: 121-132.

  16. Comer SD, Cahill CM. Fentanyl: receptor pharmacology, abuse potential, and implications for treatment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019; 106: 49-57.

  17. Peene L, Le Cacheux P, Sauter AR, Joshi GP, Beloeil H, Collaborators PWG, et al. Pain management after laminectomy: a systematic review and procedure-specific post-operative pain management (prospect) recommendations. European Spine Journal. 2021; 30: 2925-2935.

  18. Kraiwattanapong C, Arnuntasupakul V, Kantawan R, Woratanarat P, Keorochana G, Langsanam N. Effect of multimodal drugs infiltration on postoperative pain in split laminectomy of lumbar spine: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020; 45: 1687-1695.

  19. Rahmanian A, Malekpour F, Rakei SM, Ghaffarpasand F, Mehrabani G. The effects of bupivacaine on postoperative back pain after lumbar laminectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Neurosurgery Quarterly. 2016; 26: 293-297.

  20. Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VWS. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain. 2005; 117: 412-420.

  21. Li L, Liu X, Herr K. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults. Pain Medicine. 2007; 8: 223-234.

  22. Kumar P, Tripathi L. Challenges in pain assessment: pain intensity scales. Ind J Pain. 2014; 28: 61-70.

  23. Coll AM, Ameen JRM, Mead D. Postoperative pain assessment tools in day surgery: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 46: 124-133.

  24. Berardino K, Carroll AH, Kaneb A, Civilette MD, Sherman WF, Kaye AD. An update on postoperative opioid use and alternative pain control following spine surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021; 13: 24978.

  25. Prabhakar NK, Chadwick AL, Nwaneshiudu C, Aggarwal A, Salmasi V, Lii TR, et al. Management of postoperative pain in patients following spine surgery: a narrative review. Int J Gen Med. 2022; 15: 4535-4549.

  26. Razak A, Corman B, Servider J, Mavarez-Martinez A, Jin Z, Mushlin H, et al. Postoperative analgesic options after spine surgery: finding the optimal treatment strategies. Expert Rev Neurother. 2023;24: 191-200.

  27. Mitra S, Carlyle D, Kodumudi G, Kodumudi V, Vadivelu N. New advances in acute postoperative pain management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018; 22: 35.

  28. Luo J, Min S. Postoperative pain management in the postanesthesia care unit: an update. J Pain Res. 2017; 10: 2687-2698.

  29. Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, Cano B, Rovira L, Morales J, et al. The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019; 72: 209-220.

  30. Tulgar S, Ahiskalioglu A, De Cassai A, Gurkan Y. Efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block in the management of pain: current insights. J Pain Res. 2019; 12: 2597-2613.

  31. El-Boghdadly K, Pawa A. The erector spinae plane block: plane and simple. Anaesthesia. 2017; 72: 434-438.

  32. Gao Z, Xiao Y, Wang Q, Li Y. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvant for ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7: 668.

  33. Schwenk ES, Lam E, Abulfathi AA, Schmidt S, Gebhart A, Witzeling SD, et al. Population pharmacokinetic and safety analysis of ropivacaine used for erector spinae plane blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023; 48: 454-461.

  34. Machado FC, Vieira JE, de Orange FA, Ashmawi HA. Intraoperative methadone reduces pain and opioid consumption in acute postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2019; 129: 1723-1732.

  35. Burns ML, Hilliard P, Vandervest J, Mentz G, Josifoski A, Varghese J, et al. Variation in intraoperative opioid administration by patient, clinician, and hospital contribution. JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7: e2351689.

  36. Bujedo BM, Santos SG, Bizueta IT, López AA, García LT. Manejo del dolor perioperatorio de los pacientes en tratamiento crónico con opioides. Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2009; 16: 288-297.

  37. Stewart JW, Dickson D, Van Hal M, Aryeetey L, Sunna M, Schulz C, et al. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blocks for pain management after open lumbar laminectomy. Eur Spine J. 2024; 33: 949-955.

  38. Singh S, Choudhary NK, Lalin D, Verma VK. Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a randomized control trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020; 32: 330-334.

  39. Avis G, Gricourt Y, Vialatte PB, Meunier V, Perin M, Simon N, et al. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane blocks for lumbar spine surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022: rapm-2022-103737.

  40. Kanna RM, Ramachandran K, Subramanian JB, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S. Perioperative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery-a double blinded, randomized controlled study. Spine J. 2023; 23: 6-13.

  41. Yayik AM, Cesur S, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A, Ay AN, Celik EC, et al. Postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spinal decompression surgery: a randomized controlled study. World Neurosurg. 2019; 126: e779-e785.

  42. Medress ZA, Chen YR, Connolly I, Ratliff J, Desai A. Laminectomy. In: Ratliff J, editor. Minimally invasive spine surgery techniques. Switzerland: Springer; 2018. pp. 41–45.

  43. Karukonda TR, Mancini N, Katz A, Cote MP, Moss IL. Lumbar laminectomy in the outpatient setting is associated with lower 30-day complication rates. Global Spine J. 2020; 10: 384-392.

  44. Alshammari HS, Alshammari AS, Alshammari SA, Ahamed SS. Prevalence of chronic pain after spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2023; 15: e41841.

  45. Waelkens P, Alsabbagh E, Sauter A, Joshi GP, Beloeil H. Pain management after complex spine surgery: A systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021; 38: 994.

  46. Zhang Z, Zhu RL, Yue L, Li X, Ma JH, Kong H, et al. Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2023; 32: 301-312.

  47. Yuce Y, Karakus SA, Simsek T, Onal C, Sezen O, Cevik B, et al. Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24: 374.

  48. Vergari A, Frassanito L, DI Muro M, Nestorini R, Chierichini A, Rossi M, et al. Bilateral lumbar ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus local anesthetic infiltration for perioperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022; 88: 465-471.

  49. Beltrame SA, Fasano F, Jalón P. Bilateral radioscopically guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in spine surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2023; 84: 360-369.

  50. Liang X, Zhou W, Fan Y. Erector spinae plane block for spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Pain. 2021; 34: 487-500.

  51. Oh SK, Lim BG, Won YJ, Lee DK, Kim SS. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2022; 78: 110647.




Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Columna. 2025;3