medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Urología

ISSN 2305-7939 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

RCU 2022; 11 (1)

Surgical treatment of renal lithiasis through percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Morales DE, Alcántara SY, Jiménez NSN, Peña MY, Kindelán CJC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 36-48
PDF size: 698.87 Kb.


Key words:

nephrolithiasis, surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Renal percutaneous surgery is considered the gold standard for the treatment of renal lithiases bigger than 2 centimetres. Bleeding represents the most feared post-surgery complication that might require a blood transfussion in some patients.
Objective: Describe the results of the surgical treatment of renal lithiasis through percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Methods: It was conducted a retrospective study in 40 patients with renal lithiasis that were treated through percutaneous nephrolithotomy from 2016 to 2020 in the Urology Service in “Dr. Carlos J. Finlay” Central Militar Hospital. For the analysis of relation among qualitative variables, it was carried out a multivariate analysis using the Chi-squared statistic. It was considered a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).
Results: The average age was 45,3 years. Male sex and the history of arterial hypertension (32,5 %) predomianted. 23 pyelic lithiasis (57,5 %) were treated. Pneumatic lithotripsy was applied in 29 patients. The average surgical time was of 92,8 minutes and 32 patients (80 %) were free of lithiasis. Seven Clavien-Dindo GII complications (17,5 %) were registered. There was not statistical association among the post-surgical complications and the clinical history (p = 0,288), the type of lithiasis (p = 0,633), laterality (p = 0,085) and the surgical time (p = 0,777), among other.
Conclusions: It was observed a quick recovery of the patients and predominated the patients with lithiasis. In the serie were found few incidents during the peri-operatory period.


REFERENCES

  1. Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. Tratamiento quirúrgico de los cálculos en las vías urinarias superiores. En:Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10 ed. México: EditorialMédica Panamericana; 2015:1375-93.

  2. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J UrolNephrol. 1976;10(3):257-9. DOI:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084?needAccess=true

  3. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on InterventionalTreatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016 [acceso 20/02/2020];69(3):475-82. Disponible en:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283815007009?via%3Dihub

  4. Pradère B, Doizi S, Proietti S, Brachlow J, Traxer O. Evaluation of Guidelines for Surgical Managementof Urolithiasis. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1267-71. DOI:https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.111

  5. Angulo JC, Bernardo N, Zampolli H, Rivero MA, Dávila H, Gutiérrez J. Trends in the management ofurolithiasis in Latin America, Spain and Portugal: results of a survey in the Confederación Americanade Urología (CAU). Actas Urol Esp. 2018 [acceso 20/02/2021];42(1):33-41. Disponible en:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0210480617300840?via%3Dihub

  6. Del Portal Cárdenas JL. Nefrolitotomía percutánea en litiasis renal no coraliforme. Hospital ClínicoQuirúrgico “Hermanos Ameijeiras”. 2012 [acceso 10/01/2021]. Disponible en:http://www.hospitalameijeiras.sld.cu/hha/sites/all/informacion/mpm/documentos/LITOTRICIA/PA/NEFROLITOTOMIA%20PERCUTANEA%20EN%20LITIASIS%20RENAL%20NO%20CORALIFORME.pdf

  7. Depestre Rabí B, Mora Rodríguez AM, Naranjo Cuellar A, Mota Pérez AA. Cirugía renal percutáneaen la litiasis. Experiencia en siete años. Rev Cubana Urol. 2018 [acceso 20/02/2021];7:e39. Disponibleen: http://www.revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/article/view/442

  8. Aguilar Reinoso R, Ordaz Morales JC, Mijares Medina H, Ricardo Sosa O, Lámelas Testa AA, GonzálezPortales Y, et al. Nefrolitotomía Percutánea en el tratamiento de la litiasis renal. Rev Cubana Urol.2018 [acceso 20/02/2021];7:e41. Disponible en:http://www.revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/article/view/444

  9. Bacallao Méndez RA, Mañalich Comas R, Leyva de la Torre C. Litiasis urinarias. En: Acosta Sariego JR,Almaguer López M, Álvarez Arias CZ, Álvarez González Y, Arce Bustabad S, Bacallao Méndez RA.Nefrología. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas, 2016: 228-36.

  10. Sakhaee K, Maalouf NM, Poindexter J, Adams-Huet B, Moe OW. Relationship between UrinaryCalcium and Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Calcium Nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2017 [acceso26/02/2021];197(6):1472-7. Disponible en:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514609/

  11. Moreno Palacios J, Avilés Ibarra OJ, López Samano VA, Rivas Ruiz R, Rodríguez Silverio J, MaldonadoAlcaraz E. Tasa libre de litos sin complicación mayor como definición de éxito en nefrolitotomíapercutánea. Gac Med Mex. 2019 [acceso 12/02/2021];155(1):52-7. Disponible en:https://gacetamedicademexico.com/files/gmm_1_19_052-057.pdf

  12. Ceballos López JE, Carvajal García R, Galeana Ruiz R, González González F, Mendoza Villanueva EJ,Martínez Manzo JA, et al. Factores asociados a complicaciones en pacientes sometidos anefrolitotomía percutánea. Rev Mex Urol. 2016 [acceso 12/02/2021];76(3):148-52. Disponible en:https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-mexicana-urologia-302-articulo-factores-asociadoscomplicaciones-pacientes-sometidos-S2007408516000215

  13. Malik MA, Jamil MN, Farooq U, Mahmood MF. Initial Experience Of Percutaneous NephrolithotomyIn Hazara Region. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018 [acceso 11/02/2021];30(2):241-4. Disponibleen: https://www.jamc.ayubmed.edu.pk/index.php/jamc/article/view/1759/1904

  14. Diri A, Diri B. Management of staghorn renal stones. Renal Failure. 2018 [acceso10/01/2021];40(1):357–62. DOI:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0886022X.2018.1459306

  15. Balaji S, Ganpule A, Herrmann T, Sabnis R, Desai M. Contemporary role of multi-tract percutaneousnephrolithotomy in the treatment of complex renal calculi. Asian J Urol. 2020 [acceso20/02/2021];7(2):102-9. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7096694/

  16. Gorbachinsky I, Wood K, Colaco M, Hemal S, Mettu J, Mirzazadeh M, et al. Evaluation of RenalFunction after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy-Does the Number of Percutaneous Access TractsMatter? J Urol. 2016;196(1):131-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.121

  17. Radfar MH, Basiri A, Nouralizadeh A, Shemshaki H, Sarhangnejad R, Kashi AH, et al. Comparing theEfficacy and Safety of Ultrasonic Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: ARandomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2017 [acceso 10/01/2021];3(1):82-8. Disponible en:https://www.eu-focus.europeanurology.com/article/S2405-4569(17)30031-7/fulltext

  18. Kubota M, Kanno T, Murata Y, Funada S, Sakamoto H, Nishiyama R, et al. The Efficacy of a ReleasedUltrasonic Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Randomized Trial Comparing SwissLithoClast® Master Versus Swiss LithoClast®. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2017 [acceso 22/01/2021];63(1):1-5.Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28245537/

  19. Castillo Rodríguez M, Borrero Barrientos LL, Manzanet Noa J, García Sixto D, Ramírez Mena A.Ureteroscopía combinada con nefrolitotomía percutánea en el tratamiento de la litiasis renoureteralcompleja. Rev Cubana Urol. 2013 [acceso 25/04/2020];2(2). Disponible en:http://www.revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/article/view/107

  20. Verdecia Vázquez J, Quintana Rodríguez M, González León T, Martínez Alfonso MÁ. Enfermedadtumoral sincrónica. Rev Cubana Urol. 2020 [acceso 21/02/2021];9(2). Disponible en:http://www.revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/article/view/593

  21. Hu X, Jiang K, Chen H, Zhu S, Zhao C. Simultaneous Treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteral Stone andCysts With Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Cyst Laser Intrarenal Incision and Drainage. Urol J.2017 [acceso 10/01/21];15(1):6-10. Disponible en:https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/urolj/index.php/uj/article/view/3775/1367

  22. Palacios Jiménez P. Vigencia del uso de las derivaciones urinarias en la endourología, una disquisiciónteórico práctica. Rev Cubana Urol. 2014 [acceso 01/12/20];3(2). Disponible en:http://www.revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/article/view/216

  23. Axelsson TA, Cracco C, Desai M, Hasan MN, Knoll T, Montanari E, et al. Consultation on kidney stones,Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2021 [acceso20/02/2021];39(6):1663-70. Disponible en:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217030/

  24. De la Concepción Gómez OM, Rojas Fiel I, Reyes Arencibia PR, Sánchez Tamaki R. NefrolitotomíaPercutánea “Tubeless”. Experiencia del Instituto de Nefrología. Rev Cubana Urol. 2018 [acceso20/02/2021];7:e40. Disponible en: http://www.revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/article/view/443

  25. Sánchez Bermeo A, Arellano Cuadros JR, García Cruz S, Torres Aguilar T, Reyes Vela C. Experienciainicial nefrolitotomía percutánea, posición de Valdivia modificada para el tratamiento quirúrgico enpacientes con litiasis renal. Rev Mex Urol. 2015 [acceso 06/12/2020];75(5):266-71. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-mexicana-urologia-302-articulo-experiencia-inicialnefrolitotomia-percutanea-posicion-S2007408515001007

  26. Kokov D, Manka L, Beck A, Winter A, Gerullis H, Karakiewicz PL, et al. Only Size Matters in StonePatients: Computed Tomography Controlled Stone-Free Rates after Mini-PercutaneousNephrolithotomy. Urol Int. 2019 [acceso 18/02/2021];103(2):166-71. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30844789/

  27. López Maguey R, Gómez Sánchez J, Martínez Arroyo C. Complicaciones de la nefrolitotomíapercutánea según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo modificada. Experiencia institucional. Rev MexUrol. 2017 [acceso 20/02/2021];77(4):272-8. Disponible en:https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/uro/ur-2017/ur174e.pdf

  28. Ketsuwan C, Pimpanit N, Phengsalae Y, Leenanupunth C, Kongchareonsombat W, Sangkum P. Peri-Operative Factors Affecting Blood Transfusion Requirements During PCNL: A Retrospective Non-Randomized Study. Res Rep Urol. 2020 [acceso 20/02/2021];12:279-85. Disponible en:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383108/

  29. Jiang E, Guo H, Yang B, Li P, Mishra P, Yang T, et al. Predicting and comparing postoperative infectionsin different stratification following PCNL based on nomograms. Sci Rep. 2020 [acceso20/02/2021];10(1). Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347600/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

RCU. 2022;11