medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2025; 70 (2)

Gender perspective in the society and medicine. Should we consider a change from within ourselves?

Ramírez AG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 55-71
PDF size: 183.39 Kb.


Key words:

Women, Otolaryngology, Gender equity, Feminist, Leadership.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To identify and analyze, from a gender perspective, factors associated with the gender gap in medical practice.
Materials and Methods: An exploratory study in which a 37-question survey was applied exploring opinions on concepts such as feminism and gender perspective, motherhood among female physicians, unpaid caregiving activities, loss of opportunities, female leadership, discrimination, and gender-based violence.
Results: The survey was completed voluntarily and anonymously by 160 female physicians. 70% were otolaryngology-head neck surgery specialists. 90% of respondents found it inspiring to observe other women in leadership positions. Factors associated with the lack of representation in leadership positions included lack of opportunities and overwhelming family and social responsibilities. 51% of married or partnered women shared equal financial responsibilities, while 38.3% shared equally in domestic and caregiving activities. Of women who were mothers, 81.5% gave up or postponed work opportunities to prioritize family care, while 60.9% believed that work interfered with breastfeeding. 65% had experienced discrimination or violence in the workplace.
Conclusions: The data from this study reveal areas of opportunity to implement gender-sensitive policies that promote equity and close inequality gaps.


REFERENCES

  1. Delivered by women, led by men: A gender and equity analysis of the global health and social workforce.Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (Human Resources for Health Observer Series No. 24). Licence:CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

  2. Graue-Wiechers E, Alarcón-Fuentes G, Guevara-Guzmán R, Osytosky-Wegman P. La feminización de lamedicina en la educación médica y áreas biomédicas. En: Corona-Vázquez T, Medina-Mora E, Ostrosky-Wegman O, Sarti-Gutiérrez EJ, Uribe-Zúñiga P, La Mujer y la Salud en México. Colección de Aniversario150 años de la Academia Nacional de Medicina. México: Academia Nacional de Medicina, 2014: 125-145.

  3. Beltrán-Rodríguez Cabo O. Datos históricos y panorama actual de Mujeres en la Otorrinolaringología Mexicana,presentado en 1er Foro Nacional de la Mujer en ORL-CCC de México, realizada en Ciudad de México,2025. Disponible en https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og0s-87iegw&t=9142s

  4. Knaul FM, Arreola-Ornelas H, Essue BM, Nargund RS, et al. The feminization of medicine in Latin America:‘More the-merrier’ will not beget gender equity or strengthen health systems. Lancet Reg Health Am 2022;8:100201. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.lana.2022.100201

  5. Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, et al. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission ratesfor medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177 (2): 206-213. https://doi.org.10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875

  6. Blohm My, Sandblom G, Enochsson L, Österberg J. Differences in cholecystectomy outcomes and operatingtime between male and female surgeons in Sweden. JAMA Surg 2023; 158 (11): 1168-1175.

  7. INEGI, Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo (ENOE 2021). Comunicado de prensa No. 580/21.

  8. Winkel AF, Telzak B, Shaw J, Hollond C, et al. The role of gender in careers in medicine: a systematicreview and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36 (8): 2392-9. https:/doi.org.10.1007/s11606-021-06836-z

  9. Bakkensen JB, Smith KS, Cheung EO, Moreno PI, et al. Childbearing, infertility, and career trajectoriesamong women in medicine. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (7): e2326192. https://doi.org.10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26192

  10. INMUJERES, Desigualdad en cifras: Una mirada a la maternidad en México. 2020; 6 (6): 1-2. https://bit.ly/3fO4GF1

  11. INEGI, Censos y Conteos de Población y Vivienda (2020). Promedio de hijos nacidos vivos de las mujeres de15 a 49 años por grupo de edad. https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/natalidad/

  12. Barnett J, Bjarnadóttir MV, Anderson D, Chen C. Understanding gender biases and differences in web-basedreviews of sanctioned physicians through a machine learning approach: mixed methods study. JMIR FormRes 2022; 6 (9): e34902. https://doi.org.10.2196/34902

  13. Mazzini C, Ficoseco VS. Críticas a las militancias feministas en redes sociales: Deshistorización, banalizacióny sexualización como estrategias de silenciamiento. Textos y Contextos desde el sur 2022; 10: 161-179.

  14. Huang Q. Anti-Feminism: four strategies for the demonisation and depoliticisation of feminism on Chinesesocial media. Feminist Media Studies 2022; 23 (7): 3583-3598.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Otorrinolaringología. 2025;70