medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2025; 23 (4)

Evaluation of the relationship between the Tokyo guidelines 2018 criteria and the Parkland Grading Scale in patients with and without acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study

Contreras AA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/120515

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/120515
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/120515

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 344-347
PDF size: 231.97 Kb.


Key words:

cholelithiasis, acute cholecystitis, chronic cholecystitis, Parkland, Tokyo 2018.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the Tokyo 2018 guidelines (TG18) and the Parkland Grading Scale (PGS) are valuable tools for evaluating the severity of acute cholecystitis in patients. They are a classification system that indicates the severity of the disease based on signs, symptoms, laboratory studies, imaging, and diagnostic laparoscopy. Although both systems have proven useful in clinical decision-making, their relationship with each other has not been studied in patients with and without acute cholecystitis. Objective: evaluate the relationship between TG18 cholecystitis classification and PGS in patients with and without acute cholecystitis. Material and methods: a retrospective, cross-sectional study was carried out that included 100 postoperative laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. The diagnosis of acute and non-acute cholecystitis was documented with the TG18 guidelines in the admission note and the PGS in the postoperative note of the clinical record. Results: a positive relationship was identified between non-exacerbated chronic cholecystitis and acute cholecystitis with PGS (p = 0.001) and a negative relationship between acute cholecystitis and PGS (p = 0.106). Conclusion: the severity of PGS is related to the acute or non-acute condition of cholecystitis.


REFERENCES

  1. Kabul Gurbulak E, Gurbulak B, Akgun IE, Duzkoylu Y, Battal M, Fevzi Celayir M et al. Prediction of the grade of acute cholecystitis by plasma level of C-reactive protein. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015; 17 (4): e28091.

  2. Simunic M, Cambj Sapunar L, Ardalic Z, Simunic M, Bozic D. Safe and effective short-time percutaneous cholecystostomy: a retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101 (44): e31412.

  3. Sakalar S, Ozakin E, Cevik AA, Acar N, Dogan S, Kaya FB et al. Plasma procalcitonin is useful for predicting the severity of acute cholecystitis. Emerg Med Int. 2020; 2020: 8329310.

  4. Mansilla S, Cubas S, Martínez M, Almada M, Machado F, Canessa C. Opciones terapéuticas para la colecistitis aguda: de las guías de Tokio 2018 a la práctica clínica. Rev Méd Urug. 2022; 38 (3): e38307.

  5. Romero C, Muñoz R, Herrera M, Lopez-Cubero S. Readmissions due to biliar complications in patients with acude cholecystitis conservatively treated due to concomitant biliar duct obstruction suspicion: a bicentric study of an usual issue. Revista Andaluza de Patología Digestiva. 2022; 45 (1): 9-13.

  6. Shrestha A, Bhattarai A, Tamrakar KK, Chand M, Yonjan Tamang S, Adhikari S et al. Utility of the Parkland Grading Scale to determine intraoperative challenges during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a validation study on 206 patients at an academic medical center in Nepal. Patient Saf Surg. 2023; 17 (1): 12.

  7. Madni TD, Nakonezny PA, Imran JB, Taveras L, Cunningham HB, Vela R et al. A comparison of cholecystitis grading scales. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019; 86 (3): 471-478.

  8. Sisa-Segovia C, Guggiari B, Cacace K, Acosta R, Luraschi V. Application of the parkland grading scale in video laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Cirugía Paraguaya. 2022; 46 (2): 7-11.

  9. Sugrue M, Sahebally SM, Ansaloni L, Zielinski MD. Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a new scoring system. World J Emerg Surg. 2015; 10: 14. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0005-x.

  10. Ambe PC, Christ H, Wassenberg D. Does the Tokyo guidelines predict the extent of gallbladder inflammation in patients with acute cholecystitis? A single center retrospective analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015; 15: 142. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0365-4.




Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2025;23