medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2025; 35 (2)

Bariatric plastic surgery using a three-stage approach of panniculectomy and liposuction in obese patients. Report on 4,056 cases

Guerrero-Reyes A
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/120837

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/120837
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/120837

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 52-61
PDF size: 1303.18 Kb.


Key words:

panniculectomy in obese patients, liposuction in obese patients, liposuction risks in obese patients, risks of panniculectomy in obese patients, risk factors for contour surgery in obese patients.

ABSTRACT

Bariatric plastic surgery employs abdominal panniculectomies in obese patients. For plastic surgeons, obese patients are not considered candidates for panniculectomy or liposuction, due to high complication rates. The objective of this study was to demonstrate a method for performing infraumbilical panniculectomies, anterior abdominal liposuction, and posterior thoracic and lumbosacral liposuction in obese patients, in separable events spaced 3 to 6 months or more apart, maintaining a maximum of 15% of the total body surface area and a maximum surgical time of 4.5 hours. Panniculectomies and liposuction were performed in events spaced three to six months apart. Over 24 years in patients with GI, GII, and GIII obesity, maintaining a maximum of 15% TBS and 4.5 hours of surgical time per event. Pre and postoperative hemograms, the xiphoid to the anterior angle of the vulva, waist circumference, and body weight were measured distance. A total of 4,056 patients underwent infraumbilical panniculectomies, 1,608 anterior abdominal liposuctions, and 1,804 posterior thoracic and lumbosacral liposuctions. All these patients showed reductions in the xiphoid to the anterior angle of the vulva distance, waist circumference, and body weight. There were 221 (2.95%) complications none fatal or severe. It is concluded that infraumbilical panniculectomy, anterior abdominal liposuction, and posterior thoracic and lumbosacral liposuction can be performed in obese patients using the staged method at 3- to 6-month intervals, maintaining a maximum 15% TBS, 4.5 hours of surgery, and maintaining a low complication rate.


REFERENCES

  1. Vindigni V, Masetto L, Bassetto F. Plastic and reconstructive surgery in obese patients. In: Foletto M, Rosenthal R, eds. The globesity challenge to general surgery: a guide to strategy and techniques. Milano: Springer; 2014. pp. 223-236.

  2. Jeffrey E, Jefferson RC, Kraft CT. Panniculectomy: practical pearls and pitfalls. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (8): e3029.

  3. Brown M, Adenuga P, Soltanian H. Massive panniculectomy in the super obese and super-super obese: retrospective comparison of primary closure versus partial open wound management. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (1): 32-39.

  4. Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Belt lipectomy. Br J Plast Surg 1960; 13: 179-186.

  5. Cárdenas-Camarena L, Reyes-Herrera MF, Vargas-Flores E, López-Fabila DA, Robles-Cervantes JA. Lipoabdominoplasty: what we have implemented and what we have modified over 26 years. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (2): e4805.

  6. Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reconstructiva (AMCPER). Liposucción y lipoescultura [Internet]. Ciudad de México: AMCPER. Disponible en: https://cirugiaplastica.mx/pacientes/procedimientos/estetica/liposuccion-y-lipoescultura

  7. Kalmar CL, Park BC, Kassis S, Higdon KK, Perdikis G. Functional panniculectomy vs cosmetic abdominoplasty: Multicenter analysis of risk factors and complications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (9): 3541-3550.

  8. Arthurs ZM, Cuadrado D, Sohn V, Wolcott K, Lesperance K, Carter P et al. Post-bariatric panniculectomy: pre-panniculectomy body mass index impacts the complication profile. Am J Surg 2007; 193 (5): 567-570; discussion 570.

  9. Carretero Gómez J, Ena J, Arévalo Lorido JC, Seguí Ripoll JM, Carrasco-Sánchez FJ, Gómez-Huelgas R et al. Obesity is a chronic disease. Positioning statement of the Diabetes, Obesity and Nutrition Workgroup of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) for an approach centred on individuals with obesity. Rev Clin Esp 2020: S0014-2565(20)30180-6.

  10. Barros LFL, Teixeira VF, Reis JAP, Ferraz RA, Araújo DC, Vendramin FS. Complications in liposuction: systematic review. Rev Bras Cir Plást 2023; 38 (1): e0641.

  11. Waizel-Bucay J, Waizel-Haiat S, Revilla-Peñaloza F. Herbal products, blood clotting and otorhinolaryngological surgery. Otorrinolaringología 2017; 62 (2): 115-142.

  12. Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE). La obesidad en México [Internet]. Ciudad de México: Gobierno de México; 2016. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/issste/articulos/la-obesidad-en-mexico#:~:text=De%20acuerdo%20con%20criterios%20establecidos,y%20obesidad%20grado%20III%20cuando

  13. Igwe D Jr, Stanczyk M, Lee H, Felahy B, Tambi J, Fobi MA. Panniculectomy adjuvant to obesity surgery. Obes Surg 2000; 10 (6): 530-539.

  14. Smith LF, Smith LF Jr. Safely combining abdominoplasty with aggressive abdominal liposuction based on perforator vessels: technique and a review of 300 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (5): 1357-1366.

  15. Cooper JM, Paige KT, Beshlian KM, Downey DL, Thirlby RC. Abdominal panniculectomies: high patient satisfaction despite significant complication rates. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (2): 188-196.

  16. Kaoutzanis C, Gupta V, Winocour J, Layliev J, Ramirez R, Grotting JC et al. Cosmetic liposuction: preoperative risk factors, major complication rates, and safety of combined procedures. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (6): 680-694.

  17. Cuenca-Pardo J, Ramos-Gallardo G, Morales OM et al. Estratificación del riesgo de trombosis y profilaxis: ¿cuál es la mejor puntuación para estratificar el riesgo de trombosis en los pacientes de cirugía plástica?, ¿cuál es la mejor profilaxis? Medicina basada en evidencia. Cir Plast 2019; 29 (1): 35-66.

  18. Morales-Olivera M, Cuenca-Pardo J, Ramos-Gallardo G et al. Consenso de jueces y expertos para validar una escala que estratifique el riesgo de trombosis en pacientes a los que se les realizan procedimientos de cirugía estética. Cir Plast 2023; 33 (1): 4-13.

  19. Vasilakis V, Lisiecki JL, Kortesis BG, Bharti G, Hunstad JP. The effect of obesity, bariatric surgery, and operative time on abdominal body contouring outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (8): NP1044-NP1052.

  20. Rohrich RJ, Mendez BM, Afrooz PN. An update on the safety and efficacy of outpatient plastic surgery: a review of 26,032 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (4): 902-908.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 2025;35