medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2025; 39 (5)

Staphylococcus aureus carriers in hip and knee arthroplasty. Effectiveness of decolonization and prevention of periprosthetic infections

Martínez W, Camacho-Terceros L, Garbini F, Bochatey E, Lopreite F
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/121078

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/121078
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/121078

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 299-304
PDF size: 270.07 Kb.


Key words:

Staphylococcus aureus carriers, directed decolonization, periprosthetic infection.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the impact of preoperative screening and the effectiveness of targeted decolonization in carriers of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) on the prevalence of acute periprosthetic infections (PJI) in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty was evaluated. Material and methods: analytical, observational, case-control, ambispective and consecutive study. 256 patients were included for hip and knee prosthetic surgery between January 2020 and December 2022. Those who underwent surgery in the period prior to the pre-surgical search for S. Aureus were called pre-intervention group (G1) between January 2020 and June of 2021, and those intervened in the search and decolonization called intervention group (G2) between July 2021 to December 2022. In G2, SA carriage and the effectiveness of bacterial decolonization were evaluated. The prevalence of periprosthetic infection due to this germ in both groups was also compared. Results: the prevalence of nasal and inguinal colonization for MSSA was 25.8% and that of MRSA was 2.3%. Preoperative decolonization therapy in SA carriers was associated with a reduction in the rate of periprosthetic infections. Conclusions: the incidence Staphylococcus aureus carriers in patients scheduled for hip and knee arthroplasty was high. Preoperative detection of S. aureus with targeted decolonization therapy was associated with a reduction in periprosthetic infections mediated.


REFERENCES

  1. Izakovicova P, Borens O, Trampuz A. Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook. EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 4(7): 482-94. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180092.

  2. Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014; 27(2): 302-45. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-13.

  3. Adeli B, Parvizi J. Strategies for the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(11 Suppl A): 42-6.

  4. Shichman I, Askew N, Habibi A, Nherera L, Macaulay W, Seyler T, et al. Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2040-2060. Arthroplast Today. 2023; 21: 101152. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101152.

  5. Jin X, Gallego LB, Hanly M, Pratt NL, Harris I, de Steiger R, et al. Estimating incidence rates of periprosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis using linked registry and administrative health data. Bone Joint J. 2022; 104-B(9): 1060-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B9.BJJ-2022-0116.R1.

  6. No authors listed. Public Health England. Surveillance of surgical site infections in NHS hospitals in England. [date last accessed 24 November 2017] Available in: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/surgical-site-infections-ssi-surveillance-nhs-hospitals-in-england

  7. Chakraborty A. Staphylococcal carriage status: implications, mechanisms and practical guidelines. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2023; 14(4): 530-4.

  8. Miller L, Lopardo G. Consenso SADI-INE "Prevención de Infección de Sitio Quirúrgico" (2015). Disponible en: https://www.sadi.org.ar/documentos/guias-recomendaciones-y-consensos/300-consenso-sadi-ine-prevencion-de-infeccion-de-sitio-quirurgico-2015

  9. Huang SS, Septimus E, Kleinman K, Moody J, Hickok J, Avery TR, et al. Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(24): 2255-65.

  10. Layer F, Ghebremedhin B, Konig W, Konig B. Heterogeneity of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains at a German University Hospital implicates the circulating-strain pool as a potential source of emerging methicillin-resistant S. aureus clones. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(6): 2179-85. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02321-05.

  11. Parvizi J, Gehrke T. International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection: let cumulative wisdom be a guide. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(6): 441.

  12. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(11): 2992-4. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9.

  13. Calderwood MS, Anderson DJ, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Garcia-Houchins S, Maragakis LL, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023; 44 (5): 695-720. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.67.

  14. Pofahl WE, Ramsey KM, Nobles DL, Cochran MK, Goettler C. Importance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus eradication in carriers to prevent postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Am Surg. 2011; 77(1): 27-31.

  15. Den Heijer CD, van Bijnen EM, Paget WJ, Pringle M, Goossens H, Bruggeman CA, et al. Prevalence and resistance of commensal Staphylococcus aureus, including meticillin-resistant S aureus, in nine European countries: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13(5): 409-15.

  16. Sakr A, Brégeon F, Mege JL, Rolain JM, Blin O. Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization: an update on mechanisms, epidemiology, risk factors, and subsequent infections. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9: 2419. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02419.

  17. Van Vugt JL, Coelen RJ, van Dam DW, Winkens B, Derikx JP, Heddema ER, et al. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among surgeons and surgical residents: a nationwide prevalence study. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015; 16(2): 178-82.

  18. Dancer SJ, Christison F, Eslami A, Gregori A, Miller R, Perisamy K, et al. Is it worth screening elective orthopaedic patients for carriage of Staphylococcus aureus? A part-retrospective case-control study in a Scottish hospital. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(9): e011642.

  19. Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005; 5(12): 751-62. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70295-4.

  20. Bode LG, Kluytmans JA, Wertheim HF, Bogaers D, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, et al. Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(1): 9-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808939.

  21. Levy PY, Ollivier M, Drancourt M, Raoult D, Argenson JN. Relation between nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and surgical site infection in orthopedic surgery: the role of nasal contamination. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(6): 645-51.

  22. Kalra L, Camacho F, Whitener CJ, Du P, Miller M, Zalonis C, et al. Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection in patients with nasal MRSA colonization. Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41(12): 1253-7.



EVIDENCE LEVEL

II




Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2025 Sep-Oct;39