Lima ÁL, Grau LIB, Gutiérrez RÁR, Díaz MA

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 1-21
PDF size: 317.22 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: When the pulp is altered by inflammatory degenerative diseases, what is known as pulp necrosis occurs. The main causes are untreated caries, trauma and multiple invasive treatments on a tooth.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and costs of one-session endodontic treatment in permanent teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis.
Methods: A prospective descriptive observational study was carried out at the Faculty of Stomatology from January 2016 to December 2020, which included the evaluation of the effectiveness of the conventional endodontic technique in one session compared with the technique developed in several sessions and an economic evaluation of the treatment. The variables studied were demographic, clinical, technique-related and outcome variables.
Results: 92.5 % of the patients treated in one session had effective treatment, 81.0 % had no postoperative pain, and 90.5 % had no signs of inflammation. Postoperative pain with predominantly mild pain intensity occurred in 19.0 % of the patients. The cost increased by 85 % for two treatment sessions and for three sessions or more it was 160 %.
Conclusions: Conventional endodontics is effective for the treatment of permanent teeth with a diagnosis of pulp necrosis, independent of the number of sessions; but costs are lower when a single session is used.

REFERENCES

1. Rosa Ricardo L, Palomino Rodríguez KL, Simeón Pérez RE. Alternativa detratamiento endodóntico ante procesos periapicales. Informe de caso. 2021 [acceso 03/072022];60(259):e858. Disponible en: http://www. rev16deabril. sld. cu/index. php/16_04/article/view/858

2. Treviño CC, Flores JJ, Rodríguez I, López F, De la Gara MA, Bocanegra JA, et al. Rev Mex Med Forense. 2020 [acceso 17/12/22];5(suppl3):105-8 Disponible en: https://revmedforense. uv. mx/index. php/RevINMEFO/article/view/2846/4744

3. Toledo-Reyes L, Alfonso-Carrazana M. Complejidad del tratamiento endodónticosegún factores asociados. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2016 [acceso 07/03/2023];53(2). Disponible en: https://revestomatologia. sld. cu/index. php/est/article/view/667

4. Ghannam MG, Alameddine H, Bordoni B. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Pulp (Tooth). En: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [acceso 17/12/2022]. Disponible en: http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/books/NBK537112/

5. Sahli CC, Aguadé EB. Endodoncia: Técnicas Clínicas y Bases Científicas. 3era ed. España: Elsevier Masson; 2014 [acceso 03/06/2022]. Disponible en: https://n9. cl/w3e6c

6. Al-Manei KK. Radiographic Quality of Single vs. Multiple-Visit Root CanalTreatment Performed by Dental Students: A Case Control Study. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(2):149-54. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 22037/iej. v13i2. 19427

7. Wong A, Zhang S, Li S, Zhu X, Zhang C, Chu C, et al. Incidence of post-obturationpain after single-visit versus multiple-visit non-surgical endodontic treatments. BMC Oral Health. 2015 [acceso 21/05/2022];15(1). Disponible en: https://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536791/

8. Raju TB, Seshadri A, Vamsipavani B, Abhilash K, Subhash AV, Kumari KV, et al. Evaluation of pain in single and multi rooted teeth treated in single visit endodontic therapy. J Int Oral Health. 2014 [acceso 21/05/2022];6(1):27-32. Disponible en: https://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC3959133/

9. Schwendicke F, Göstemeyer G. Cost-effectiveness of Single- Versus MultistepRoot Canal Treatment. J Endod. 2016 [acceso 21/05/2022];42(10):1446-52. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. joen. 2016. 06. 013

10. Drummond MF, O'brien BJ, Stoddart G, Torrance GW. Métodos para laevaluación económica de los programas de asistencia sanitaria. 2da ed. España: Ediciones Díaz de Santos; 2014 [acceso 21/5/2022]. Disponible en: https://books. google. com. pa/books?id=_mblrE_GkzIC&printsec=copyright#v=onepage&q&f=false

11. Lima-Álvarez L, Rodríguez-Álvarez I, Maso-Galán M. Eficacia de la técnica paso-atrás en tratamientos de endodoncia en una sesión. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2019 [acceso 17/12/2022];56(1). Disponible en: https://revestomatologia. sld. cu/index. php/est/article/view/1926

12. Maldonado-Sanhueza F, Gómez-Inzunza V, Rosas-Mendez C, Hernández-Vigueras S. Evaluación del Éxito de Tratamientos Endodónticos Realizados por Estudiantes de Pregrado en una Universidad Chilena. Int. J. Odontostomat. 2020 [acceso 25/112022;14(2). Disponible en: https://www. scielo. cl/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2020000200154

13. Lima Illescas MV. Caracterización de patologías pulpares de pacientesatendidos en el área de endodoncia de una clínica docente de Cuenca-Ecuador. Rev. Reportendo. 2020 [acceso 03/11/2022];7(1):7. Disponible en: http://www. reportaendo. com/index. php/reportaendo/article/view/71

14. Lima Illescas MV. Caracterización de patologías pulpares de pacientesatendidos en el área de endodoncia de una clínica docente de Cuenca-Ecuador. Revista Reporteando, Cuenca. 2020;7(1). DOI: https://doi. org/10. 36332/reportaendo. v7i1. 71

15. Alsulaimani RS, Almanei KK, Abbtain RA, Binrabba RS, Ashri NY. The Correlationbetween Endodontic Mishaps and Single-Visit Treatment in King Saud University. Int J Dent Oral Health. 2016;3(1) DOI: http://dx. doi. org/10. 16966/2378-7090. 224 16. Sánchez Alemán J, García Guerrero C. Categorización del fracaso para eltratamiento endodóntico primario. Acta Odont Col. 2019 [acceso 14/11/2022];9(2):23. Disponible en: https://revistas. unal. edu. co/index. php/actaodontocol/article/view/76432

16. Shibu TM. Postoperative pain in endodontics: A systemic review. J Dent OralHyg. 2015 [acceso 14/11/2022];7(8):130-7. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 5897/jdoh2015. 0168

17. Wong A, Zhang S, Zhang C, Chu C. Perceptions of single-visit and multiple-visitendodontic treatment: a survey of endodontic specialists and general dentists in Hong Kong. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. 2015 [acceso 01/05/2022];7(3):263-71. Disponible en: https://ejmcm. com/article_7918_6eb9686ba4fbf51372b6c66d8f0d2514. pdf

18. Bassam S, El-Ahmar R, Salloum S, Ayoub S. Endodontic postoperative flare-up:An update. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2021 [acceso 12/10/2022];33(4):9. Disponible en: https://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589595/

19. Singh A, Konark A, Nazeer J, Singh R, Singh S. Incidence of postoperative flare-ups after single-visit and multiple-visit endodontic therapy in permanent teeth. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2020 [acceso 03/12/2022];38(1):79-83. Disponible en: https://doi. org/10. 4103/JISPPD. JISPPD_354_19

20. Sankarsingh Morillo CC, Bóveda C. Determinación de éxito y fracaso en eltratamiento de conductos. Odontólogo invitado. 2003 [acceso 03/12/2022]. Disponible en: http://www. carlosboveda. com/Odontologosfolder/odontoinvitad oold/odontoinvitado33. htm

21. Alvarez Rodríguez J, Clavera Vázquez TJ, Becerra Alonso O, Rodriguez LedesmaEB. Tratamiento endodóntico radical en pulpa no vital en una sola visita. Rev Haban Cienc Méd. 2014 [acceso 15/12/2022];13(2):219-26. Disponible en: http://scielo. sld. cu/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-519X2014000200007&lng=es

22. Field JW, Gutmann JL, Solomon ES, Rakusin H. A clinical radiographicretrospective assessment of the success rate of single-visit root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2004 [acceso 15/12/2022];37(1):70-82. DOI: https://doi. org/1010. 1111/j. 1365-2591. 2004. 00765. x

23. Baeza Palacios G, Morales Puché K, Palma Eyzaguirre AM. Tratamientoendodóntico en una sesión comparado con múltiples sesiones en pacientes con dentición permanente. Int. J. Inter. Dent. 2020 [acceso 03/07/2022];13(3):217-23. Disponible en: https://www. scielo. cl/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2452-55882020000300217

24. Sharma S, Blicher B, Lucier Pryles R, Lin J. Single- Vs Multiple-Visit Root CanalTherapy. Inside Den. 2019 [acceso 12/12/2022];15(6). Disponible en https://www. aegisdentalnetwork. com/id/2019/06/single--vs-multiple-visit-root-canal-therapy#:~:text=6-