2025, Number 4
Next >>
Rev Mex Urol 2025; 85 (4)
Surgical specialties and their particularities in the face of scientific evidence
Cruz-Peralta ES
Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 1-5
PDF size: 122.08 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users’guides to the medical literature. II. How to usean article about therapy or prevention. A. Arethe results of the study valid? Evidence-BasedMedicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993;270(21): 2598–2601. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.270.21.2598.
González-Padilla DA, Dahm P. Evaluatingthe Certainty of Evidence in EvidencebasedMedicine. European Urology Focus.2023;9(5): 708–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.014.
Rosenberg J. Surgical research remains comicopera and maybe for good reasons. DanishMedical Journal. 2021;68(12): A10210792.
Viñas Salas J, Gómez Arbonés X, Piñol FelisC. Investigación en especialidades quirúrgicas.Educación Médica. 2004;7: 61–65.
McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sasako M, LovettB, Griffin D. Randomised trials in surgery:problems and possible solutions. BMJ : BritishMedical Journal. 2002;324(7351): 1448–1451.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1448.
Koh HJW, Whitelock-Wainwright E, GasevicD, Rankin D, Romero L, Frydenberg M, et al.Quality Indicators in the Clinical Specialtyof Urology: A Systematic Review. EuropeanUrology Focus. 2023;9(3): 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.004.
Pantiora E, Jazrawi A, Hersi AF, Abdsaleh S,Ahlstedt H, Molnar E, et al. Magnetic Seed vsGuidewire Breast Cancer Localization WithMagnetic Lymph Node Detection. JAMASurgery. 2024;159(3): 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6520.
Augustinus S, van Goor IWJM, Berkhof J,Daamen LA, Groot Koerkamp B, Mackay TM,et al. Alternative Randomized Trial Designsin Surgery: A Systematic Review. Annals ofSurgery. 2022;276(5): 753–760. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005620.
Schünemann HJ, Cuello C, Akl EA, MustafaRA, Meerpohl JJ, Thayer K, et al. GRADEGuidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other toolsto assess risk of bias in non-randomized studiesshould be used to rate the certainty of a bodyof evidence. Journal of clinical epidemiology.2019;111: 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012.
Barker TH, Habibi N, Aromataris E, StoneJC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al. The revisedJBI critical appraisal tool for the assessmentof risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies.JBI evidence synthesis. 2024;22(3): 378-388.https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00268.