medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 4

Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2025; 85 (4)

Surgical specialties and their particularities in the face of scientific evidence

Cruz-Peralta ES
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 1-5
PDF size: 122.08 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users’guides to the medical literature. II. How to usean article about therapy or prevention. A. Arethe results of the study valid? Evidence-BasedMedicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993;270(21): 2598–2601. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.270.21.2598.

  2. González-Padilla DA, Dahm P. Evaluatingthe Certainty of Evidence in EvidencebasedMedicine. European Urology Focus.2023;9(5): 708–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.014.

  3. Rosenberg J. Surgical research remains comicopera and maybe for good reasons. DanishMedical Journal. 2021;68(12): A10210792.

  4. Viñas Salas J, Gómez Arbonés X, Piñol FelisC. Investigación en especialidades quirúrgicas.Educación Médica. 2004;7: 61–65.

  5. McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sasako M, LovettB, Griffin D. Randomised trials in surgery:problems and possible solutions. BMJ : BritishMedical Journal. 2002;324(7351): 1448–1451.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1448.

  6. Koh HJW, Whitelock-Wainwright E, GasevicD, Rankin D, Romero L, Frydenberg M, et al.Quality Indicators in the Clinical Specialtyof Urology: A Systematic Review. EuropeanUrology Focus. 2023;9(3): 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.004.

  7. Pantiora E, Jazrawi A, Hersi AF, Abdsaleh S,Ahlstedt H, Molnar E, et al. Magnetic Seed vsGuidewire Breast Cancer Localization WithMagnetic Lymph Node Detection. JAMASurgery. 2024;159(3): 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6520.

  8. Augustinus S, van Goor IWJM, Berkhof J,Daamen LA, Groot Koerkamp B, Mackay TM,et al. Alternative Randomized Trial Designsin Surgery: A Systematic Review. Annals ofSurgery. 2022;276(5): 753–760. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005620.

  9. Schünemann HJ, Cuello C, Akl EA, MustafaRA, Meerpohl JJ, Thayer K, et al. GRADEGuidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other toolsto assess risk of bias in non-randomized studiesshould be used to rate the certainty of a bodyof evidence. Journal of clinical epidemiology.2019;111: 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012.

  10. Barker TH, Habibi N, Aromataris E, StoneJC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al. The revisedJBI critical appraisal tool for the assessmentof risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies.JBI evidence synthesis. 2024;22(3): 378-388.https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00268.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2025;85