medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2025; 85 (4)

An unusual complication of prostatic arterial embolization: penile glans necrosis

Serret TC, Donis CF, García JC, Bermúdez RJ, Ziani AH, Sánchez-Pedreño M, García Ron A, Pereira Rodríguez N, Téllez Martínez-Fornés M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 14
Page: 1-8
PDF size: 285.20 Kb.


Key words:

Prostate, Embolization, Necrosis, Glans, Penectomy.

ABSTRACT

Clinical case description: the case of an 84-year-old male is presented, who developed penile glans necrosis over several days following prostatic arterial embolization. Due to the progression of the condition, a partial penectomy had to be performed for resolution.
Relevance: prostatic arterial embolization represents an effective approach for benign prostatic hyperplasia, although it is not without risks. As embolization of non-target areas is a very unusual but serious complication, there is a need of knowing and describing this kind of results.
Clinical implications: despite the unusual nature of penile glans necrosis, early recognition and diagnosis is crucial to prevent the worse outcomes. There are several clinical treatments before a surgical option that includes hyperbaric oxygen therapy or phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors wich have a short opportunity window.
Conclusion: gland necrosis is a rare but serious condition that requires intensive and constant management to try to achieve its reversal. Ultimately, its treatment consists of partial or total penectomy.


REFERENCES

  1. Cornu JN, Gacci M, Hashim H, HerrmannTRW, Malde S, Netsch C, et al. EAU Guidelineson Non-Neurogenic Male Lower Urinary TractSymptoms (LUTS). 2023.

  2. Chung E. Penile Glans Necrosis followingProstatic Artery Embolization for theTreatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: ARare but Serious Complication. Case Reportsin Urology. 2021;2021: 6662899. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6662899.

  3. Jung JH, McCutcheon KA, Borofsky M,Young S, Golzarian J, Reddy B, et al. Prostaticarterial embolization for the treatment of lowerurinary tract symptoms in men with benignprostatic hyperplasia. The Cochrane Databaseof Systematic Reviews. 2020;12(12): CD012867.https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012867.pub2.

  4. Naidu SG, Narayanan H, Saini G, Segaran N,Alzubaidi SJ, Patel IJ, et al. Prostate ArteryEmbolization-Review of Indications, PatientSelection, Techniques and Results. Journal ofClinical Medicine. 2021;10(21): 5139. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215139.

  5. A Pereira J, Bilhim T, Duarte M, Rio TintoH, Fernandes L, Martins Pisco J. Patientselection and counseling before prostaticarterial embolization. Techniques in Vascular andInterventional Radiology. 2012;15(4): 270–275.https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2012.09.003.

  6. Malling B, Røder MA, Brasso K, Forman J,Taudorf M, Lönn L. Prostate artery embolisationfor benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematicreview and meta-analysis. European Radiology.2019;29(1): 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5564-2.

  7. Knight GM, Talwar A, Salem R, MouliS. Systematic Review and Meta-analysisComparing Prostatic Artery Embolization toGold-Standard Transurethral Resection ofthe Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology.2021;44(2): 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02657-5.

  8. Bhatia S. Meta-Analysis of Prostatic ArteryEmbolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-Review of 12-Month Outcomes Data. Journalof vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR.2017;28(5): 772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.01.010.

  9. Chung E. Penile Glans Necrosis FollowingProstatic Artery Embolization for BenignProstatic Hyperplasia: Case Series and Reviewof Current Literature. The World Journal ofMen’s Health. 2023;41(2): 396–402. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.210244.

  10. Parkin CJ, Pham C, Chung A, Menogue S, CattJ, Gottschalk G, et al. Non-Target Embolizationof the Glans Penis during Prostatic ArteryEmbolization. Société Internationale d’UrologieJournal. 2021;2(5): 323–326. https://doi.org/10.48083/UCZQ9737.

  11. Johnson-Arbor K, Field D. Use of hyperbaricoxygen therapy to treat glans penis necrosisafter prostatic artery embolization. UrologyCase Reports. 2022;45: 102237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102237.

  12. Montoya Martínez G, Otero García JM, LópezSamano V, González Martínez J, SerranoBrambila E. Necrosis de pene: Revisión de 18casos en el Hospital de Especialidades CentroMédico nacional Siglo XXI. Archivos Españolesde Urología. 2006;59(6): 571–576.

  13. Carnevale FC, Moreira AM, Antunes AA. The‘PErFecTED technique’: proximal embolizationfirst, then embolize distal for benign prostatichyperplasia. Cardiovascular and InterventionalRadiology. 2014;37(6): 1602–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0908-z.

  14. Picel AC, Hsieh TC, Shapiro RM, VezeridisAM, Isaacson AJ. Prostatic Artery Embolizationfor Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: PatientEvaluation, Anatomy, and Technique forSuccessful Treatment. Radiographics: A ReviewPublication of the Radiological Society of NorthAmerica, Inc. 2019;39(5): 1526–1548. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180195.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2025;85