medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2026; 49 (2)

Effectiveness of radiofrequency and suprascapular-subacromial bursa block in rotator cuff syndrome

López-Julio MP, Leotau-Rodríguez MA, Gómez-Garcés SL, Cabanzo-Arenas DF, Colorado-Barbosa LL, Durán-Anaya JP, Rangel-Santos D, Rangel-Jaimes GW
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/122902

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/122902
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/122902

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 77-81
PDF size: 443.62 Kb.


Key words:

pulsed radiofrequency, continuous radiofrequency, analgesic blockade, suprascapular nerve, subacromial bursa.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: rotator cuff syndrome (RCS) is one of the main causes of painful shoulder that requires interventional analgesic management to optimize symptomatic control. Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency treatment (PRF) compared to the blockade applied to the suprascapular nerve and subacromial bursa in patients with RCS. Material and methods: this is a prospective cohort analytical study conducted on patients diagnosed with RCS. It assesses the impact on effectiveness and side effects of interventional analgesic management, whether through suprascapular blockade, pulsed radiofrequency (PRFp), or pulsed plus continuous radiofrequency (PRFp+c). Results: a total of 109 patients were evaluated: 67 in the blockade group, 34 in the PRFp group, and eight in the PRFp+c group. The group that showed the greatest delta at 30 days, moving from severe pain to mild in 50% of cases (p = 0.050), was the PRFp+c group. Conclusions: the choice between suprascapular blockade and PRF, whether PRFp or PRFp+c, does not seem to have a significant impact on long-term post-operative pain. However, the short-term benefit is significantly favorable when using PRF+c, which may be a potentially beneficial analgesic alternative.


REFERENCES

  1. Orhurhu V, Akinola O, Grandhi R, Urits I, Abd-Elsayed A. Radiofrequency ablation for management of shoulder pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23:56.

  2. Samaan A, Spinner D. Shoulder ablation approaches. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2021;32:675-682.

  3. Mendis V, Mottaleb R, Sethi S. Radiofrequency techniques in pain management. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2019;20:572-575.

  4. Varacallo M, El Bitar Y, Sina RE, Mair SD. Rotator cuff syndrome. In: StatPearls. 2024.

  5. Ugalde CE, Zuñiga D, Barrantes R. Actualización del síndrome de hombro doloroso: lesiones del manguito rotador. Med Leg Costa Rica. 2013;30:63-71.

  6. Sir E, Eksert S. Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve in partial rotator cuff tears. Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49:1524-1528.

  7. Franco ESB, Puga MEDS, Imoto AM, Almeida J, Mata VD, Peccin S. What do Cochrane Systematic Reviews say about conservative and surgical therapeutic interventions for treating rotator cuff disease? Synthesis of evidence. Sao Paulo Med J. 2019;137:543-549.

  8. Ryosa A, Laimi K, Aarimaa V, Lehtimaki K, Kukkonen J, Saltychev M. Surgery or conservative treatment for rotator cuff tear: a meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:1357-1363.

  9. Rea W, Kapur S, Mutagi H. Radiofrequency therapies in chronic pain. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2011;11:35-38.

  10. Deniz S, Bakal O, Inangil G. Application of radiofrequency in pain management. InTech. 2016.

  11. Pushparaj H, Hoydonckx Y, Mittal N, Peng P, Cohen SP, Cao X, et al. A systematic review and meta?analysis of radiofrequency procedures on innervation to the shoulder joint for relieving chronic pain. Eur J Pain. 2021;25:986-1011.

  12. Minsalud. Resolución N° 8430 de 1993. Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. 1993. Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/lists/bibliotecadigital/ride/de/dij/resolucion-8430-de-1993.pdf

  13. Cetingok H, Serce GI. Does the application of pulse radiofrequency to the suprascapular nerve provide additional benefit in patients who have undergone glenohumeral intra-articular steroid injection and suprascapular nerve block? Agri. 2022;34:272-277.

  14. Gabrhelik T, Michalek P, Adamus M, Mikova M, Dolecek L. Effect of pulsed radiofrequency therapy on the suprascapular nerve in shoulder pain of various aetiology. Ir J Med Sci. 2010;179:369-373.

  15. Arcila MA, Rivera RC, Campuzano D, Mejía MA, Martínez SM. Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Colomb J Anesthesiol. 2013;41:104-108.

  16. Sá Malheiro N, Afonso NR, Pereira D, Oliveira B, Ferreira C, Cunha AC. Efficacy of ultrasound guided suprascapular block in patients with chronic shoulder pain: retrospective observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020;70:15-21.

  17. Simopoulos TT, Nagda J, Aner MM. Percutaneous radiofrequency lesioning of the suprascapular nerve for the management of chronic shoulder pain: a case series. J Pain Res. 2012;5:91-97.




Table 1
Table 2
Table 3

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2026;49