medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-297X (Print)

2023, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Estomatol 2023; 60 (1)

Shear bond strength of different bonding agents to dental metal alloys

Medina OIH, Rivera GJA, Grazioli G, Zamarripa CJE, Cuevas SCE

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page:
PDF size: 725.13 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The bonding of indirect restorations is one of the most important steps, in order to achieve adequate retention and sealing of the interface between the restorative material and the tooth.
Objective: To evaluate the shear bond strength of different bonding agents to two metal alloys used in dentistry.
Methods: In vitro experimental study. One hundred specimens of base metal alloys, 50 nickel-chromium and 50 nickel-chromium-titanium were prepared and randomly divided into 5 groups. This division was made according to the bonding agent used: two-step self-etching system (Clearfil SE Bond; CSB), universal adhesive system (Single Bond Universal; SBU), self-adhesive resin cement (Maxcem Elite; ME), glass ionomer (IV) and zinc phosphate (ZnPO). After the application of each bonding agent, the treated specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hr at 37 ºC and subjected to a shear bond strength test.
Results: Shear bond strength was significantly influenced by the type of bonding agent (p = 0.002) and the type of alloy used (p < 0.001). Shear bond strength was highest when using the Clearfil SE Bond system, followed by Single Bond Universal; the differences between Maxcem Elite and Zinc Phosphate were not significant. Finally, IV did not show adhesion to any of the metal alloys used.
Conclusions: The use of Clearfil SE Bond increased the bond strength of resinous cements to metallic alloys.


REFERENCES

  1. Aslam A, Hassan SH, Nayyer M, Ahmed B. Intraoral repair protocols for fractured metal-ceramic restorations-Literature review. S. Afr. Dent. J. 2018 [acceso 13/05/2022];73(1):[aprox. 7 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-851620180001000081.

  2. Yadav JS, Dabas N, Bhargava A, Malhotra P, Yadav B, Sehgal M. Comparing two intraoral porcelain repair systems for shear bond strength in repaired cohesive and adhesive fractures, for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations: An in vitro study. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2019;19(4):362. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_120_19

  3. Nima G, Ferreira PVC, Paula AB de, Consani S, Giannini M. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of a composite resin to nickel-chrome metal alloy. Braz. Dent. J. 2017;28(2):210-5. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201701288

  4. Abduo J, Sambrook RJ. Longevity of ceramic onlays: A systematic review. J. Esthet. Dent. 2018;30(3):193-215. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12384

  5. Cuevas Suárez CE, de Oliveira da Rosa WL, Vitti RP, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta-Analysis of in Vitro Studies. J. Prosthodont. 2020;29(4):298-308. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13147

  6. Hopp CD, Land MF. Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: A review. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Den. 2013;5:21-32. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S42016

  7. Wingo K. A review of dental cements. J. Vet. Dent. 2018;35(1):18-27. DOI: 10.1177/0898756418755339

  8. Nikaido T, Tagami J, Yatani H, Ohkubo C, Nihei T, Koizumi H, et al. Concept and clinical application of the resin-coating technique for indirect restorations. Dent. Mater. J. 2018;37(2):2017-253. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2017-253

  9. Suksaphar W, Banomyong D, Jirathanyanatt T, Ngoenwiwatkul Y. Survival rates against fracture of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with full-coverage crowns or resin composite restorations: a systematic review. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2017;42(3):157-67. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.3.157

  10. Heboyan AG, Vardanyan AR, Avetisyan AA. Cement selection in dental practice. World Science. 2019;2(3):4-9. DOI: 10.31435/rsglobal_ws/31032019/6405

  11. Klosa K, Meyer G, Kern M. Clinically used adhesive ceramic bonding methods: a survey in 2007, 2011, and in 2015. Clin. Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1691-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1684-0

  12. Hill EE. Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dent. Clin. of North Am. 2007;51(3):643-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.04.002

  13. Rezaie HR, Rizi HB, Khamseh MMR, Öchsner A. Dental restorative materials. In: A Review on Dental Materials. Springer; 2020. p. 47-171.

  14. Sita Ramaraju DV, Alla RK, Alluri VR, Raju M. A review of conventional and contemporary luting agents used in dentistry. Am. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014;2(3):28-35. DOI: 10.12691/ajmse-2-3-1

  15. Imamura N, Kawaguchi T, Shimizu H, Takahashi Y. Effect of three metal priming agents on the bond strength of adhesive resin cement to Ag-Zn-Sn-In alloy and component metals. Dent. Mater. J. 2017;37(2):301-7. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2017

  16. Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: Adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability-A systematic review. Materials. 2019;12(5):790. DOI: 10.3390/ma12050790

  17. Valente LLLL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Gonçalves APAP, Fernández E, Loomans B, Moraes RRRR, et al. Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2016;69:15-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.020

  18. Ahmed MH, Yao C, van Landuyt K, Peumans M, van Meerbeek B. Extra Bonding Layer Compensates Universal Adhesive's Thin Film Thickness. J. Adhes. Dent. 2020;22(5):483-501. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a45179

  19. Al-Helou H, Swed E. Effect of metal type and surface treatment on shear bond strength of resin cement (in vitro study). J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2016;16(1). DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.164882

  20. Naghili A, Talebi S, Amirifar H. Universal adhesives: A literature review. Int. J. Pharm. Res.. 2018 [acceso 13/05/2022];10(4):[aprox. 12 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ijpronline.com/ViewArticleDetail.aspx?ID=734320.

  21. Dos Santos RA, de Lima EA, Mendonça LS, de Oliveira JE, Rizuto AV, de Araújo Silva Tavares ÁF, et al. Can universal adhesive systems bond to zirconia? J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2019;31(6):589-94. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12521

  22. Raeisosadat F, Ghoveizi R, Eskandarion S, Beyabanaki E, Tavakolizadeh S. Influence of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cement to base metal alloys. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2020;11(1):45-9. DOI: 10.15171/jlms.2020.08

  23. Shafiei F, Behroozibakhsh M, Abbasian A, Shahnavazi S. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to base metal alloys having different surface treatments. Dent. Res. J. 2018;15(1):63-70. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.223610

  24. Gryksa M, Eriksson M, de Basso N, Shen Z. Phosphate dental cements aged in vivo up to 25 years. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2020;119(5-6):338-47. DOI: 10.1080/17436753.2020.1774221




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com