medigraphic.com

2026, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Med Crit 2026; 40 (1)

Measurement of the time-velocity integral of the left ventricular outflow tract by subxiphoid window as an alternative to conventional measurement in critically ill patients

Olivares GJM, Barajas JG, Urbina VAG

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 30-34
PDF size: 273.78 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI) is an essential parameter for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients. However, conventional apical views may be limited in patients with mechanical ventilation, altered positioning, or pleural devices. Material and methods: we conducted a retrospective observational study of 24 critically ill patients admitted between November 2024 and April 2025. LVOT VTI was measured using the apical five-chamber and modified subxiphoid views. Agreement was analyzed with the Bland-Altman method, and correlation was assessed with Pearson’s coefficient. Results: mean LVOT VTI was 23.4 cm (apical) and 20.5 cm (subxiphoid). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of 2.51 ± 2.76, with 75% of measurements within concordance limits. Pearson’s correlation demonstrated a strong association (r = 0.85, p ‹ 0.0001). Conclusion: subxiphoid LVOT VTI measurement is a feasible and reliable alternative when conventional windows are not attainable in critically ill patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Isseh IN, Lee R, Khedraki R, Hoffman K. A critical reviewof hemodynamically guided therapy for cardiogenic shock:old habits die hard. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2021;23(5):29. doi: 10.1007/s11936-021-00903-8.

  2. Díaz-Gómez JL, Mayo PH, Koenig SJ. Point-of-Careultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(17):1593-1602. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1916062.

  3. Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Braunwald E. Time to add a fifthpillar to bedside physical examination: inspection, palpation,percussion, auscultation, and insonation. JAMA Cardiol.2018;3(4):346-350. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0001.

  4. Mercado P, Maizel J, Beyls C, Titeca-Beauport D, Joris M,Kontar L, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurateand precise method for estimating cardiac output in the criticallyill patient. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1737-7.

  5. de Backer D, Cholley BP, Slama M, Vieillard-Baron A, Vignon P,editores. Hemodynamic monitoring using echocardiography inthe critically ill. 2011a ed. Berlín, Alemania: Springer; 2011. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87956-5.

  6. Mercadal J, Borrat X, Hernández A, Denault A, Beaubien-Souligny W, González-Delgado D, et al. A simple algorithmfor differential diagnosis in hemodynamic shock based on leftventricle outflow tract velocity–time integral measurement: acase series. Ultrasound J. 2022;14(1):36. doi: 10.1186/S13089-022-00286-2.

  7. Blanco P. Rationale for using the velocity-time integral and theminute distance for assessing the stroke volume and cardiacoutput in point-of-care settings. Ultrasound J. 2020;12(1):21. doi:10.1186/s13089-020-00170-x.

  8. Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, FinstuenJA, Foster MC, et al. Guidelines for performing acomprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examinationin adults: recommendations from the American Society ofEchocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(1):1-64.doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.004.

  9. Orde S, Slama M, Hilton A, Yastrebov K, Mclean A. Pearls andpitfalls in comprehensive critical care echocardiography. CritCare. 2017;21(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1866-z.

  10. Lau YH, See KC. Point-of-care ultrasound for critically-ill patients:a mini-review of key diagnostic features and protocols. World JCrit Care Med. 2022;11(2):70-84. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i2.70.

  11. Vincent JL, de Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med.2013;369(18):1726-1734. doi: 10.1056/NEJMRA1208943.

  12. Paola-Paolinelli G. Principios físicos e indicaciones clínicasdel ultrasonido doppler. Rev médica Clín Las Condes.2013;24(1):139-148. doi: 10.1016/s0716-8640(13)70139-1.

  13. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Shi J, Hua Z, Xu JI. Cardiac outputmeasurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution:a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLo SOne.2019;14(10):e0222105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222105.

  14. Tan C, Rubenson D, Srivastava A, Mohan R, Smith MR, BillickK, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integraloutperforms ejection fraction and Doppler-derived cardiac outputfor predicting outcomes in a select advanced heart failure cohort.Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12947-017-0109-4.

  15. Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, Chemla D, Richard C, TeboulJL. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsivenessin critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity.Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(7):1125-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0646-7.

  16. Villavicencio C, Leache J, Marin J, Oliva I, Rodriguez A, Bodí M,et al. Basic critical care echocardiography training of intensivistsallows reproducible and reliable measurements of cardiac output.Ultrasound J. 2019;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13089-019-0120-0.

  17. Gentile F, Buoncristiani F, Sciarrone P, Bazan L, PanichellaG, Gasparini S, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract velocity-timeintegral improves outcome prediction in patients with secondarymitral regurgitation. Int J Cardiol. 2023;392:131272. doi:10.1016/J.IJCARD.2023.131272.

  18. Pérez-Manjarrez A, García-Cruz E, Gopar-Nieto R, Jiménez-Rodríguez GM, Lazcano-Díaz E, Rojas-Velasco G, et al.Usefulness of the velocity–time integral of the left ventricularoutflow tract variability index to predict fluid responsivenessin patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Echo Res Pract.2023;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/S44156-023-00022-Z.

  19. Babes EE, Stoicescu M, Bungau SG, Uivarosan D, Tit DM, TomaMM, et al. Left ventricle outflow tract velocity-time index andright ventricle to left ventricle ratio as predictors for in hospitaloutcome in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Diagnostics(Basel). 2022;12(5):1226. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051226.

  20. Scalia IG, Farina JM, Wraith R, Brown L, Abbas MT, PereyraM, et al. Association between echocardiographic velocity timeintegral ratio of mitral valve and left ventricular outflow tract andclinical outcomes post transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valverepair. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):e32378. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32378.

  21. Cheong I, Castro VO, Gómez RA, Merlo PM, Tamagnone FM. Amodified subcostal view: a novel method for measuring the LVOTVTI. J Ultrasound. 2023;26(2):429-434. doi: 10.1007/s40477-022-00671-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com