De VV, Pavez S, Águila R, Viacava A, Coda S, Pérez C, Val V, Rojas J

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 97-102
PDF size: 455.40 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: in anterior glenohumeral dislocation, in addition to classic lesions such as Hill-Sachs (HS), Bankart, or glenohumeral anteroinferior ligament injury, other associated lesion like superior labral (SLAP), osteocondral (LOC), or glenolabral articular disruption (GLAD) have been described. Although open Latarjet surgery yields excellent outcomes, it does not address these associated lesions. Objective: to compare functional outcomes, recurrence rate, persistent symptoms and return to sport in patients undergoing open Latarjet surgery with and without associated lesions diagnosed by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and methods: retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent open Latarjet surgery for anterior glenohumeral instability, with preoperative MRI and a minimum follow-up of two years, were included. Patients were divided into two groups, group 1: without associated lesions, and group 2: with associated lesions. Outcomes assessed included subjective shoulder value (SSV), visual analog scale (VAS), recurrence rate, persistent symptoms and return to sport. Results: 28 patients were evaluated (age: 32 ± 6.8 years; 27 males, 1 female): 22 in group 1 and six in group 2 (associated lesions: 5 SLAP, 2 LOC, 1 GLAD). No significant differences between groups were found in SSV (92 ± 8.9 vs 85 ± 15, p = 0.29), VAS (1 vs 1, p = 0.6), recurrence rate (1 [4.5%] vs 0 [0%], p = 0.79) and persistent symptoms (7 [31%] vs 2 [33%], p = 0.65). There was a lower return to sport rate in group 2 vs group 1 (20 [90%] vs 3 [50%], p = 0.05). Conclusions: patients with anterior glenohumeral dislocation treated with open Latarjet surgery and not treated associated injuries have lower return to sport rate after, with a minimum follow-up of two years.

REFERENCES

1. Shields DW, Jefferies JG, Brooksbank AJ, Millar N, Jenkins PJ. Epidemiology of glenohumeral dislocation and subsequent instability in an urban population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(2): 189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.006.

2. Kim DS, Yoon YS, Kwon SM. The spectrum of lesions and clinical results of arthroscopic stabilization of acute anterior shoulder instability. Yonsei Med J. 2010; 51(3): 421-6. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.3.421.

3. Rutgers C, Verweij LPE, Priester-Vink S, van Deurzen DFP, Maas M, van den Bekerom MPJ. Recurrence in traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations increases the prevalence of Hill-Sachs and Bankart lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(6): 2130-40. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06847-7.

4. Martinez Gallino R, Olmos M, Narbona PA. Lesiones asociadas a inestabilidad anterior de hombro: frecuencia y relevancia clínica en relación al número de episodios. Artroscopia (B Aires). 2019; 26(1): 1-5.

5. Masud S, Momtaz D, Betsch M, Migliorini F, Ghali A, Popa A, et al. A comprehensive comparison and evaluation of surgical techniques for anterior shoulder instability: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023; 32(11): e531-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.004.

6. Young AA, Maia R, Berhouet J, Walch G. Open Latarjet procedure for management of bone loss in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(2 Suppl): S61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.022.

7. Lafosse L, Boyle S. Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19(2 Suppl): 2-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.010.

8. Balg F, Boileau P. The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(11): 1470-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.18962.

9. Gilbart MK, Gerber C. Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(6): 717-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.123.

10. Arrigoni P, Huberty D, Brady PC, Weber IC, Burkhart SS. The value of arthroscopy before an open modified latarjet reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008; 24(5): 514-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.021.

11. Ernat JJ, Rakowski DR, Casp AJ, Lee S, Peebles AM, Hanson JA, et al. Shoulder arthroscopy in conjunction with an open Latarjet procedure can identify pathology that may not be accounted for with magnetic resonance imaging. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021; 4(2): e301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.014.

12. Cunningham G, Benchouk S, Kherad O, Ladermann A. Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(2): 540-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3910-3.

13. Randelli P, Fossati C, Stoppani C, Evola FR, De Girolamo L. Open Latarjet versus arthroscopic Latarjet: clinical results and cost analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(2): 526-32. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3978-9.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

III