Millán DG, Mora RFG, Orozco AC, Rosas MR, Braña RK

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 185-188
PDF size: 831.17 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Ankle fractures are common injuries that can significantly impact mobility and quality of life. Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis joint can cause instability and abnormal movement. Surgical treatment, particularly with the use of a situational screw, has proven more effective than conservative techniques or no repair. However, there is debate about whether the screw should be removed after recovery. Although this practice has had few reported complications, many orthopedic surgeons have opted to leave the screw in place, arguing that there are no significant differences in outcomes. In a study of 69 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for ankle fractures, 39 were women and 30 were men, only 26 had the situational screw removed, with residual pain being the most common complication (16 cases). Among the 43 patients whose screws were not removed, stiffness was the predominant complication. Other complications, such as surgical site infection, syndesmotic diastasis, or screw exposure, were not observed in this group. These findings align with international reports, showing that leaving the situational screw in place is increasingly common, with a low incidence of severe complications.

REFERENCES

1. Pavone V, Papotto G, Vescio A, Longo G, D’Amato S, Ganci M et al.Short and middle functional outcome in the static vs. dynamic fixationof syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: a retrospective case seriesstudy. J Clin Med. 2023; 12 (11): 3637.

2. Castro-Guerrero D, Rosas-Medina J. Inestabilidad residual de tobilloen pacientes con lesión de la sindesmosis sin fractura tratados contornillos situacionales. Acta Ortop Mex. 2019; 33 (5): 292-296.

3. Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C, MacLeod MD. Functional andradiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation:implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24 (1): 2-6.

4. Juárez-Jiménez HG, Garibay-Cervantes A, Rosas-Medina JA, Salas-Morales GA, Rodríguez-Reyes EJ. Prevalencia de las complicacionesrelacionadas con el retiro del tornillo de situaciones. Acta Ortop Mex.2018; 32 (2): 76-81.

5. Kaftandziev I, Spasov M, Trpeski S, Zafirova-Ivanovska B, BakotaB. Fate of the syndesmotic screw--Search for a prudent solution.Injury. 2015; 46 Suppl 6: S125-129. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.062

6. Hsu YT, Wu CC, Lee WC, Fan KF, Tseng IC, Lee PC. Surgical treatmentof syndesmotic diastasis: emphasis on effect of syndesmotic screwon ankle function. Int Orthop. 2011; 35 (3): 359-364.

7. Gennis E, Koenig S, Rodericks D, Otlans P, Tornetta P 3rd. The fateof the fixed syndesmosis over time. Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36 (10):1202-1208.

8. Rius-Zavala M, Gil-Orbezo F, Trueba-Davalillo C, Trueba-VasavilbasoC, Acuña-Tovar M. Comparación funcional en el tratamiento de lasfracturas de tobillo B de Weber con implante y sutura versus tornillosituacional. Acta Ortop Mex. 2017; 31 (5): 212-216.

9. Vilanova LR, Monzó EG. Evaluación de las patient-reported outcomesmeasures (PROM) en cirugía de pie y tobillo. Revista del Pie y Tobillo.2021; 35 (1): 7-16.

10. Paez CJ, Lurie BM, Upasani VV, Pennock AT. Functional outcomesof unstable ankle fractures with and without syndesmotic fixation inthe adolescent population. J Child Orthop. 2021; 15 (4): 418-425.

11. Bafna KR, Jordan R, Yatsonsky D 2nd, Dick S, Liu J, Ebraheim NA.Revision of syndesmosis screw fixation. Foot Ankle Spec. 2020; 13(2): 138-143.