medigraphic.com
ISSN 3061-7774 (Electronic)
ISSN 1870-7203 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Hospital Ángeles Health System

2026, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2026; 24 (3)

A comparative study of the efficacy of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis based on ASHP, CDC, and WHO guidelines for the prevention of systemic infections in the pediatric population

Córdova GA, Silva RH

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 243-246
PDF size: 535.12 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Surgical infections are a significant cause of pediatric morbidity. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) reduces postoperative complications, although its impact on systemic infections remains unclear. A retrospective comparative study was conducted involving 330 pediatric patients who underwent major surgery. They were divided into two groups: adequate SAP according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, and no prophylaxis or incorrect administration. The incidence of systemic infections was 3.6% (12 cases), all in the group without SAP (0 vs 7%, p < 0.01; RR 7.0; 95% CI: 1.9-25.5). The results confirm that appropriate APE prevents systemic infections and support Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP).


REFERENCES

  1. Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35 (6): 605-627.

  2. Wong D, Wong K, Wong R, Tan K. Pediatric surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: current evidence and future directions. J Pediatr Surg. 2019; 54 (8): 1532-1538.

  3. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999; 27 (2): 97-132.

  4. Rosenthal VD, Richtmann R, Singh S et al. Surgical site infections, International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 30 countries, 2005-2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34 (6): 597-604.

  5. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013; 70 (3): 195-283.

  6. Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S et al. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16 (12): e276-287.

  7. Ban KA, Minei JP, Laronga C et al. American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: Surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 update. J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 224 (1): 59-74.

  8. World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. Geneva: WHO; 2018.

  9. Tamma PD, Cosgrove SE. Antimicrobial stewardship. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011; 25 (1): 245-260.

  10. Valdez-López CR, Vega-Miranda A, Palacios-Aguilera R, Ponce-De-León A, Álvarez-Hernández D. Epidemiología de infecciones del sitio quirúrgico en hospitales de México. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020; 44: e35.

  11. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152 (8): 784-791.

  12. Kieran K, Little DC, Goldin AB, Rangel SJ. Adherence to perioperative antibiotic guidelines in pediatric surgery: room for improvement. J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 52 (4): 591-595.

  13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment. NICE guideline NG125. London: NICE; 2019.

  14. World Health Organization. Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (GLASS) report: early implementation 2022. Geneva: WHO; 2022.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com