medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • Policies
    • Políticas éticas
    • Políticas editoriales generales
    • Políticas de revisión de manuscritos
    • Políticas de acceso abierto
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2026; 49 (S1)

Physiological monitoring in critical care obstetrics

Pisano D
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 9
Page: 496-497
PDF size: 692.48 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction

Anesthesiologists, both generalists and subspecialists, have an important role in the care of the critically ill obstetric patient. Obstetrical conditions that may require critical care treatment range from spinal epidural hematomas (which require experience with neuroanesthesia); peripartum cardiomyopathy (borrowing expertise from cardiac and criticalcare anesthesiologists); local anesthetic systemic toxicity, or LAST (regional anesthesiology), to name a few. Implicit in all of these conditions is the need for advanced monitoring to ensure safe care of the critically ill obstetric patient. Although standard physiological monitoring used by anesthesiologists is mandatory, additional physiological monitoring may be necessary, if not essential to manage the critically ill obstetric patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Schneider M, Ettlin T, Kaufmann M, Schumacher P, Urwyler A, HamplK, et al. Transient neurologic toxicity after hyperbaric subarachnoidanesthesia with 5% lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 1993;76:1154-1157. doi:10.1213/00000539-199305000-00044.

  2. Freedman JM, Li DK, Drasner K, Jaskela MC, Larsen B, Wi S.Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia: an epidemiologicstudy of 1,863 patients. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:633-641. doi:10.1097/00000542-199809000-00012. Erratum in: Anesthesiology.1998;89:1614.

  3. Nelson A, Benzon HT, Jabri RS. Diagnosis and management of spinaland peripheral nerve hematoma [Internet]. New York: NYSORA.Available in: https://www.nysora.com/topics/complications/diagnosismanagement-spinal-peripheral-nerve-hematoma/#toc_SPINALEPIDURAL-HEMATOMA

  4. Suresh RE, Eckert T, Kasem RA, Small C, Saway B, Hubbard Z, etal. Surgical management of spinal intradural hematomas: illustrativecases. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2025;9:CASE25108. doi: 10.3171/CASE25108.

  5. Gee CM, Tsang A, McKenzie M, Belanger L, Ritchie L, Ailon T, etal.Targeting spinal cord perfusion pressure in acute spinal cord injurythrough cerebrospinal fluid drainage: A prospective multi-centerclinical trial. PLoS Med. 2026;23:e1004925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004925.

  6. Zhao ZS, Wang ZZ, Wang L, Qian LH, Hu B, Ma YL. The prognosticvalue of thromboelastography MA/R ratio in predicting mortality inacute respiratory failure patients. PLoS One. 2026;21:e0340360. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0340360.

  7. Chandran K, Quimby D Jr, Bezerra HG, Crousillat D. Early use ofintrapartum intra-aortic balloon pump support for haemodynamicstabilization of peripartum and anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy:a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024;8:ytae033. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae033.

  8. Hrymak CS, Labib A, Akkanti B, Antonini MV, Bruggeman B,Griffee MJ, et al. ECMO for the pregnant and peripartum patient: Apractical review of indications, unique management considerations,and an approach framework. Perfusion. 2025;40:1727-1742. doi:10.1177/02676591251321070.

  9. Farsani A, Nuveen NK. Successful local anesthetic systemictoxicity (LAST) management with intralipid: a case emphasizingpost-stabilization monitoring and 2020 American Society ofRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) updates. Cureus.2025;17:e85538. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85538.




CC BY-NC-ND

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2026;49