medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Pediatría

ISSN 0035-0052 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
    • Políticas éticas
    • Políticas editoriales generales
    • Políticas de revisión de manuscritos
    • Políticas de acceso abierto
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Pediatr 2026; 93 (3)

Congenital myotonic dystrophy type 1; the importance of family study

Guapi-Nauñay VH, Yépez-Hidalgo EI, Díaz-Maldonado CM, Díaz-Torres MD
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/123990

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/123990
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/123990

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 116-123
PDF size: 1795.22 Kb.


Key words:

myotonic dystrophy, myotonic dystrophy protein kinase, newborn, genetic anticipation, hypotonia, differential diagnosis.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: congenital myotonic dystrophy (CDM) is the severe form of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD1)—usually maternally transmitted—characterized by hypotonia and respiratory insufficiency, with high mortality. Objective: to describe the clinical findings and genealogy of a newborn with CDM. Case presentation: the patient was born at 31 weeks of gestational age. During pregnancy, polyhydramnios and decreased fetal movements were noted. At birth, the infant presented with generalized hypotonia and apnea, requiring advanced resuscitation and permanent mechanical ventilation. The patient exhibited areflexia, severe feeding difficulties, recurrent episodes of bronchospasm, and superinfections, ultimately dying at 73 days of life. Molecular analysis of the DMPK gene demonstrated the presence of an allele detectable by PCR, a finding consistent with excessive expansion of the CTG triplet. Family history revealed 10 relatives affected by clinical manifestations of MD1 at various ages across four generations, following an autosomal dominant pattern. Conclusion: CDM is a disease with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern and the phenomenon of genetic anticipation. This condition should be considered in the differential diagnosis of neonates with generalized hypotonia.


REFERENCES

  1. Thornton CA. Myotonic dystrophy. Neurol Clin. 2014; 32(3): 705-719.

  2. Hahn C, Salajegheh MK. Myotonic disorders: a review article. IranJ Neurol. 2016; 15(1): 46-53.

  3. Turner C, Hilton-Jones D. Myotonic dystrophy: diagnosis,management and new therapies. Curr Opin Neurol. 2014; 27(5):599-606.

  4. Meola G, Cardani R. Myotonic dystrophies: an update on clinicalaspects, genetic, pathology, and molecular pathomechanisms.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015; 1852(4): 594-606.

  5. Wallgren-Pettersson C, Bushby K, Mellies U, Simonds A. ENMCworkshop: ventilatory support in congenital neuromusculardisorders congenital myopathies, congenital muscular dystrophies,congenital myotonic dystrophy and SMA (II). Neuromuscul Disord.2004; 14(1): 56-69.

  6. Campbell C, Levin S, Siu VM, Venance SL, Joshi P. Congenitalmyotonic dystrophy: Canadian population-based surveillancestudy. J Pediatr. 2013; 163(1): 120-5.e1-3.

  7. Paul S, Dansithong W, Kim D, Rossi J, Webster NJ, Comai L etal. Interaction of muscleblind, CUG-BP1 and hnRNP H proteinsin DM1-associated aberrant IR splicing. EMBO J. 2006; 25(18):4271-4283.

  8. Hasbun HJ, Bevilacqua JA, Luco MI, Catalán J. Distrofia miotónicatipo I (enfermedad de Steinert) y embarazo. Descripción de uncaso clínico. Rev Chil Neuro-Psiquiat. 2010; 48(4): 264-268.

  9. Licourt-Otero D, Orraca-Castillo M, Tamargo-Barbeito TO.Fenotipo asociado al diagnóstico clínico precoz de la distrofiamiotónica tipo 1. Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2024; 28(5): e6536.

  10. Morales de Machín A, Machín E, Bracho A. Distrofia miotónica tipo1 y embarazo. Asesoramiento genético. Presentación de caso.Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 2025; 85(3): 493-504.

  11. Gültekin ND, Yilmaz FH, Altunhan H, Ors R. From the symptomsof an undiagnosed mother to the infant with congenital myotonicdystrophy. J Clin Anal Med. 2017; 8(Suppl 1): 58-60.

  12. Sánchez-Villares C, Domínguez P, Mateos M, Hernández FA.Enfermedad de Steinert congénita, la forma más grave de distrofiamiotónica tipo 1. Bol Pediatr. 2017; 57: 307-310.

  13. Silva CT, Madureira C, Melo C, Martins C, Cardoso R, MiguelC. Hypotonia and feeding problems in the newborn: a congenitalmyotonic dystrophy type 1 clinical case. Nascer Crescer. 2019;27(4): 246-248.

  14. Ahmadpour-Kacho M, Pasha YZ, Pournajaf S. A couple of the firstcousins born with hypotonia and maternal polyhydramnios. ClinCase Rep. 2024; 12(2): e8503.

  15. del Olmo SP, Solé DC, Martínez VE. Beyond premature apneapauses: congenital myotonic dystrophy type 1. Andes Pediatr.2024; 95(5): 608-612.

  16. Zhao Q, Wang S, Wang Y, Ding S. Neonatal congenital myotonicdystrophy with DMPK gene expansion: clinical features and shorttermoutcomes. Front Pediatr. 2026; 13: 1648611.

  17. Echenne B, Bassez G. Congenital and infantile myotonicdystrophy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013; 113: 1387-1393.

  18. Jones M. Unusual brain and/or neuromuscular findings withassociated defects. In: Lyons K, Crandall M, Del Campo M,editors. Recognizable patterns of human malformation. 8th ed.Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022. p. 226-314.

  19. Jain A, Al Khalili Y. Congenital myotonic dystrophy. In: StatPearls[Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.

  20. Seifert B, Reddi H, Kang B, Bean L, Shealy A, Rose N. Myotonicdystrophy type 1 testing, 2024 revision: a technical standard of theAmerican College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genet Med. 2024; 26(8): 101145.

  21. Joosten I, Hellebrekers D, de Greef B, Smeets H, de Die-Smulders C, Faber C et al. Parental repeat length instabilityin myotonic dystrophy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020; 28(7): 956-962.

  22. Mankodi A, Teng-Umnuay P, Krym M, Henderson D, SwansonMS, Thornton CA. Ribonuclear inclusions in skeletal muscle inmyotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2. Ann Neurol. 2003; 54(6):760-768.

  23. Bird TD. Myotonic dystrophy type 1. 1999. In: Adam MP, Bick S,Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA):University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2025.

  24. Sondheimer N. Patterns of single-gene inheritance. In: CohnRD, Swoboda W, Hamosh A, editors. Thompson & Thompson,Genetics in medicine. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2024. p.109-131.

  25. Uchio Y, Ikai T. Survey of feeding issues experienced by patientswith spinal muscular atrophy type 2 in Japan. J Phys Ther Sc.2025; 37: 270-273.

  26. Hedberg-Oldfors C, Bedir AZ, Visuttijai K, Michael E, OldforsA. Proteomic analysis of nemaline myopathy in infants revealsdistinct common dysregulated proteins and cellular pathways.Front Neurol. 2025; 16: 1661747.

  27. Yatsenko SA, Rajkovic A. Preimplantation genetic testing. In:Pyeritz RE, Korf BR, Grody W, editors. Emery and Rimoin’sprinciples and practice of medical genetics and genomics: perinataland reproductive genetics. 7th ed. United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2022.p. 249-268.




CC BY-NC-ND

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Pediatr. 2026;93