Escamilla-Núñez A, Villasís-Keever MÁ

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 147-149
PDF size: 716.95 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. Abeliuk A, Gutiérrez C. Historia y evolución de la inteligenciaartificial. Revista Bits de Ciencia. 2021; 21: 14-21.

2. Waldrop MM. The Dream Machine: J.C.R. Licklider and theRevolution that made computing personal. Nueva York/Boston:Penguin Books; 2001.

3. Llamas JJG. Inteligencia Artificial Generativa (IAG). El nuevoparadigma en el diseño y producción de contenido. En: García-Macías JA, Palazuelos-Rojo IJ, Pérez Rivas DA. Inteligenciaartificial. México: Astra ediciones; 2024.

4. van der Heyden MAG, Engh MA, Whalley C, Ferdinandy P.Publication fraud in the era of generative artificial intelligence.Br J Pharmacol. 2026; 183 (16): 4509-4511. doi: 10.1111/bph.70550.

5. Pu Z, Shi CL, Jeon CO, Fu J, Liu SJ, Lan C et al. ChatGPT andgenerative AI are revolutionizing the scientific community: aJanus-faced conundrum. Imeta. 2024; 3 (2): e178. doi: 10.1002/imt2.178.

6. Pellegrina D, Helmy M. AI for scientific integrity: detecting ethicalbreaches, errors, and misconduct in manuscripts. Front Artif Intell.2025; 8: 1644098. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1644098.

7. Malani PN, Ross JS. AI Use in research and the need forcontinued guidance. JAMA. 2026; 335 (8): 673. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.26845.

8. Messeri L, Crockett MJ. The uncritical adoption of AI in science isalarming - we urgently need guard rails. Nature. 2026; 653 (8115):675-676. doi: 10.1038/d41586-026-01557-x.

9. Damian Okaibedi E. ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: threatto academic integrity? J Responsib Technol. 2023; 13: 100060.doi: 10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060.

10. Hao Q, Xu F, Li Y, Evans J. Artificial intelligence tools expandscientists’ impact but contract science’s focus. Nature. 2026; 649(8099): 1237-1243. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09922-y.