medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2007; 29 (3)

Reoperation for failed antireflux surgery

Velázquez GJA, Bevia PF, Delgadillo TG, Servín TE, Serrano GI, Marmolejo EJ, Ortiz De La PSIlD, Sánchez GFJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 181-187
PDF size: 128.54 Kb.


Key words:

Failure, fundoplication, re-operation.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the causes that lead to failed fundoplication, as well as to assess the efficacy of open revisional surgery and repair of the fundoplication.
Setting: Specialty Hospital of the National Medical Center “La Raza” (IMSS, Mexican Institute of Social Security).
Design: Descriptive, transversal study.
Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis.
Patients and methods: We included all patients subjected to fundoplication with persistent or recurrent symptomatology, which required open revisional surgery, identifying the alterations encountered during surgery and the repair made, during the period from January 1, 1992 to December 31, 2006.
Results: From the 1,142 patients subjected to fundoplication, 47 (4.11%) needed revisional surgery. The original surgery corresponded to open Nissen technique in 32 patients (68%). The most frequent symptomatology was recurrent reflux in 19 patients (40%), followed by dysphagia in 17 (36%). The surgical finding that explained most of the failed fundoplications was disruption in the approximation of esophageal hiatus´s crura in eight (27%), stenosis and disruption of the fundoplication with seven (23%), each. The surgery most frequently performed during re-operation was the Guarner-type fundoplication in 10 (21%) cases, and repair of the esophageal hiatus´s crura in 9 (19%). Other procedures were that of Nissen with closure of pillars in seven (15%) and that of Belsey-Mark IV with four (9%) cases. The 3-month follow-up revealed no recurrences of symptoms in 91% of the cases.
Conclusions: Esophageal hiatus´s crura Disruption is the most frequent cause of failed fundoplication in our milieu. A successful re-operation depends on an adequate pre-operative protocol and on the expertise of the surgeon.


REFERENCES

  1. Greenfield L, Mulholland M. Scientific principles and practice. Second Edition Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease; Chapter 18; Lippincott-Raven Publishers:2000.

  2. Nilsson G, Larson S, Johnson F. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 873-878.

  3. Waring J. Postfundoplication complications. Prevention and management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1999; 28: 1007-1019.

  4. Isolauri J, Luostarinen M, Viljakka M, Isolauri E, Keyrilainen O, Karvonen AL. Long term comparison of antireflux surgery versus conservative therapy for reflux esophagitis. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 295-9.

  5. Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR. Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 36-40.

  6. Pointner R, Bammer T, Then P, Kamolz T. Laparoscopic refundoplications after failed antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 1999; 178: 541-4.

  7. Bais JE, Horbach TL, Masclee AA, Smout AJ, Terpstra JL, Gooszen HG . Surgical treatment for recurrent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease after failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 2000; 7: 43-9.

  8. de Beaux AC, Watson DI, O’Boyle C, Jamieson GG. Role of fundoplication in patient symptomatology after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 2001; 8: 117-21.

  9. Bessell JR, Finch R, Gotley DC, Smithers BM, Nathanson L, Menzies B. Chronic dysphagia following laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 2000; 7: 341-5.

  10. Wills VL, Hunt DR. Dysphagia after antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 2001; 8: 86-499.

  11. Tew S, Ackroyd R, Jamieson GG, Holloway RH. Belching and bloating: facts and fantasy after antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 77-481.

  12. Siewert R, Lepsien G, Weiser HF, Schattenmann G, Peiper HJ. Das Teleskop-Phänomen. Chirug 1977; 8: 40-645.

  13. Urschel JD. Complications of antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 1993; 166: 68-70.

  14. Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pasiut M. Haas CF Wyckypiel H, et al. Is laparoscopic refundoplication feasible in patients with failed primary open antireflux surgery? Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 381-5.

  15. Watson AJ, Krukowski ZH . Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic anterior fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 392-4.

  16. Dallemagne B, Weerts J, Jehaes C. Operaciones antirreflujo fallidas: lecciones de las reintervenciones. Rev Mex Cir Endosc 2003; 4: 19-24.

  17. Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlon MA, Stavropoulos GP. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 649-652.

  18. Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, Asche KU, Pointner R. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 40-48.

  19. Kamolz T, Bammer T, Pasiut M, Pointner R. Health-related and disease-specific quality of life assessment after laparoscopic repeated fundoplication. Chirurg 2000; 71: 707-11.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2007;29