medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2003, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2003; 25 (4)

Learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal surgery How to overcome it?

López CJA, Guzmán CF, Martínez GA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 291-294
PDF size: 58.86 Kb.


Key words:

Inguinal hernia, laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy, learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy.

ABSTRACT

Antecedents: Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy has undergone diverse stages, loosing prestige at the beginning due to the high rate of complications and recurrences. This occurred because the basic principle of laparoscopic approach was not followed, i.e., to imitate what had already been proven in open surgery, changing only the approach, which will yield all the known advantages. It was not until 1992 that inguinal repair was performed following the Stoppa technique with a laparoscopic approach. Since then, those groups starting to use this technique and complying with the requisites of the learning curve have reported similar results and, in some cases, even better ones than those obtained in open tension-free mesh inguinal repair.
Objective: To analyze the difficulties encountered during the learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy.
Patients and methods: From February 1995 to August 2002, 38 surgeons were trained in two-month courses, performing a total of 1050 laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies in 1000 patients. The learning curve was defined as the number of required surgeries to reach an adequate surgical time, a similar rate of complications and recurrences as that obtained with the open approach, and a deep knowledge of the anatomy of the posterior inguinal region.
Results: Thirty procedures were needed to consider that the learning curve had been overcome. Morbidity was of 8.5% and recurrences of 1.5%, which did not vary during the teaching process even in the presence of the tutors during the procedure. According to a recent survey, from the total of trained surgeons, only 10% are performing laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies.
Conclusion: To justify a laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy the following requisites must be fulfilled. Surgical time must be similar to that of the open surgery, morbidity and recurrences must be lower or the same as those obtained with traditional surgery, besides offering the already known advantages of laparoscopic surgery. To overcome the learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy, the surgeon must perform at least 30 procedures under tutorial assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Schultz L, Graber J, Pietrajitta J, Hickok D. Laser laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a clinical trial preliminary results. J Laparoendosc Surg 1990; 1: 41-5.

  2. Ferzli GS, Massad A, Albert P. Extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Surg 1992; 2: 281-6.

  3. McKernan JB, Laws HL. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach. Surg Endosc 1993; 7: 26-8.

  4. Corbitt JD Jr. Transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993; 3: 328-32.

  5. Rives J, Stoppa R, Fortesa L, Nicaíse H. Les peeces en dacron et leur place dans la chirurgie des hernies de L’aine. A propos de 65 cas recueillis dans une statistique integrale de 274 interventionss pour hernie. Ann Chir 1968; 22: 159-71.

  6. Stoppa RE, Rives JL, Warlaumont CR, Palot JP, Verhaeghe PJ, Delattre JF. The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North Am 1984; 64: 269-85.

  7. Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RV, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, et al. Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1541-7.

  8. Schwab JR, Beaird DA, Ramshaw BJ, Franklin JS, Duncan TD, Wilson RA, et al. After 10 years and 1,903 inguinal hernias, what is the outcome for the laparoscopic repair? Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1201-6.

  9. Tamme C, Scheidbach H, Hampe C, Schneider C, Kockerling F. Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 190-5.

  10. Felix EL, Harbertson N, Vartanian S. Laparoscopic hernioplasty: significant complications. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 328-31.

  11. Voitk AJ. The learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for the community general surgeon. Can J Surg 1998; 41: 446-50.

  12. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F. Learning curve for unilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1724-8.

  13. Liem MS, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Weidema WF, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, et al. The learning curve for totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 281-5.

  14. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ. Macintyre IM. Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1476-9.

  15. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW. A cost-utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1,513,008 adult patients. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 180-9.

  16. Payne JH. Complications of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Sem Lap Surg 1997; 4: 166-181.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2003;25