medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Archivos de Neurociencias

Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Arch Neurocien 2006; 11 (4)

Tumors of the skull: surgical experience with 15 patients

Ibarra-De La Torre A, Trujillo-Ojeda HM, Aguilar-López R, Silva-Morales F
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 277-281
PDF size: 196.17 Kb.


Key words:

skull tumors, symptoms, signs, treatment.

ABSTRACT

Tumors of the skull are 1-2% the all bone masses, they may be primary, secondary or proliferative, para-neoplastic lesion. Are cause principals symptoms and signs mass, headache, and palsies of one or several cranial nerves. The diagnosis by X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The treatment is surgical, by biopsy, resection of the lesion and following for management with therapy of radiation or systemic. Objective: to demonstrate the surgical experience in 15 patients with tumors of the skull, with treatment in the Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX. Method and clinical material: from June 2003 to October 2005, retrospective review of 15 patients with diagnosis of tumors of the skull, they with treatment in the Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX. Results: fifth teen patients with tumors of the skull, 8 males and 7 women, ages of 2 to 71 years old (media 41.3 years old); the diagnosis was fibrous dysplasia 4/15 patients, metastasis, osteoma, hemangioma and plasmocytoma 2/15 patients each one, pseudotumor inflammatory, congenital inclusion cyst and Langerhans cell histiocytosis 1/15 patients each one; the surgical treatment was for all, predominance of the lesion resection, with craniectomy simple and craneoplasty. Two patients with fibrosus dysplasia fronto-orbital and ethmoidal, now they persist with symptoms. Conclusion: the most of the surgical treatment was curative for tumors of the skull, but is important the follow-up when the diagnosis of fibrous dysplasia fronto-orbital.


REFERENCES

  1. Doran SE, Gebarski SS, Hoff JT. Tumors of the skull. En: Youmans JR (editor), Neurologial Surgery. Fourth edition, vol. 4, Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company 1996.

  2. Chaudhari AB, Ladapo F, Mordi VPN, Choudhury KJ, Naseem A. Congenital inclusion cyst of the subgaleal space. J Neurosurg 1982; 56:540-4.

  3. Hamilton HB, Voorhies RM. Tumors of the skull. En: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (editors). Neurosurgery, vol. II, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1996.

  4. Rauschning W. Tumores cerebrales y masas de tipo tumoral: clasificación y diagnóstico diferencial. En: Osborn A (editor), Neurorradiología diagnóstica, Madrid, Harcourt Brace de España, 1996.

  5. Kerr RSC, Milford CA. Skull base tumors. En: Moore AJ, Newell DW(editors), Neurosurgery principles and practice, London, Springer, 2005.

  6. Goodrich JT, Hall CD. Fibrous dysplasia involving the craniofacial skeleton. En: Rengachary SS, WilkinsRH (editors), Neurosurgical operative atlas, vol. 1, Baltimore, AANS Publications Committee, Williams & Wilkins, 1991.

  7. DeMonte F, Al-Mefty O. Tumors of the skull, meninges, and cranial nerves. En: Grossman RG, Loftus CM (editors), Principles of Neurosurgery, Second edition, Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1999.

  8. Reddy SK, Hill CS. Assessment and management of cancer pain. En: Levin VA (editor), Cancer in the Nervous System. Second edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.

  9. Chernov M, DeMonte F. Skull base tumors. En: Levin VA (editor), Cancer in the Nervous System. Second edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.

  10. Lindsay KW, Bone I, Callander R. Neurology and Neurosurgery Illustrated, Third edition, Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1998.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Arch Neurocien. 2006;11