medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Authors instructions        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 5

Salud Mental 2006; 29 (5)

Epidemiology approach of an outbreak epidemic conversion disorder in adolescents

Navarrete NS, Riebeling NC, Mejía AJM, Nava ZA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 38
Page: 9-15
PDF size: 56.08 Kb.


Key words:

Outbreak, adolescents, Epidemic Conversion Disorder.

ABSTRACT

Introduction
Several outbreaks of Epidemic Conversion Disorder are occurring in different groups of people in the world. Rather than being viewed as a number of people suffering from individual conversion disorder, epidemic hysteria is considered as a social phenomenon involving otherwise healthy people. We received a report letter from Dirección General de Epidemiología, about the existence of a large number of possible food poisoning cases among students, attending morning sessions at a technical high school, located in the downtown area of Mexico City. Twelve students were driven to the Mexican Red Cross Hospital due to fainting. The aims of this study were to determine the cause of such outbreak in a group of adolescents; to get an adequate explanation about the origin of the event; to identify the event dissemination ways and associates risk factors.
Methods
Study design: A matched case-control study was carried out to identify factors associated with the illness. Two control cases were randomly selected from the list of non-ill students for each case. Fifty two cases and 104 controls were included.
Hypotheses: Following the good health status determined by the physician at the hospital, we started the initial interview with the students. We reached the following possible hypotheses regarding the origin of this outbreak: first, the event was due to food poisoning; second, to the inhalation of a toxic gas such as carbon monoxide and thirdly, by exposure to high levels of contaminants. Finnaly, it might be a mass event of conversion disorder.
Variables: Among the variables included in the study were: sex, age, class group, location of the student at the time of the outbreak, and foods eaten during recess and immediately before the outbreak. All the students present at the time of the outbreak were interviewed using a standard questionnaire.
Laboratory: Simultaneously, samples of the food-products sold in and around the school that day were collected for bacteriologic and chemical analyses, the existence of a gas leak, carbon monoxide source, or any other airborne pollutant was investigated by the research team.
Analyses: The demographic characteristics were analyzed by descriptive statistic; association between risk factors as possible causes of the event was determined by multivariate analysis at 95% confidence interval.
Results: The outbreak occurred in the building of a downtown public school in Mexico City. The school has three floors, surrounding a central yard. There are 11 classrooms, two laboratories, an art workshop and a school medical clinic.
The total duration of outbreak was 15 minutes. There were 455 students enrolled in the morning program, all of them were interviewed. A total of 52 cases was identified, among the 455 students, for an attack rate of 11.4%. There were three groups in which no cases were found. The attack rate in girls was 3.9 times higher than in boys. Sixty five percent of the cases occurred in two of the nine classrooms (1° B and 2° A). All the students of one group had been waiting at the patio for over an hour during an interclass break. Case cero was a girl from this group with a previous history of fainting. The outbreak occurred outside classroom in the central yard. Five female classmates of case cero fainted while they were with her in the yard. Cases then spread rapidly to the first floor with an attack rate of 13.2 percent, the second floor had 7.7 percent, and finally the third floor had 2.1 percent. All cases had fainted as per case definition. Additionally, headache was a prominent symptom occurring in 88 percent, paresthesias in 56 percent, and perceived difficulty in moving arms or legs in 35 percent. Also almost a quarter of the cases complained of irritation of the eyes and nose. Within one hour, all had completely recovered. Five days after the problem, three girls fainted; no outbreak occurred.
Being a girl or belonging to class groups 1°B or 2°A, were the most significant risk factors, with (p 0.001). Also being less than 15 years of age was a significant risk factor for illness. The analysis of food preference data in the cases and controls showed that drinking a fruit beverage “X” was not related to the illness. Foods such as sandwiches, brought from home and cookies, candies and popcorn bought from street venders, had a borderline significant association with the illness. However, the number of cases attributable to these foods was very low. Also, it was difficult to figure out how sandwiches were prepared by mothers of individual students and how this factor could be implicated. No pathogen toxin or toxic chemical were identified in the food samples. Some foods studied in the crude analysis were ruled out in the multivariate analysis. A thorough environmental was negative, there being no evidence of a continuing gas leak or other causes. The pollution levels during that week were reported as being within the normal range, by the Metropolitan Index of Air Quality (IMECA). In order to evaluate psychological factors, individual interviews were carried out. The psychologist found that the cases tended to have one or both parents absent from home due to divorce or death, and their family have been damaged by economic problems. In addition, psychological testing showed that these cases had higher anxiety levels than controls.
Discussion
According to our findings, this outbreak appears as a Epidemic Conversion Disorder. First, no biologic cause was found for the cases. In addition, there was not any evidence to implicate food poisoning, no source of toxic gas could be identified at the school, and the levels of air pollution were not above normal levels. The clinical presentation was not different from the fainting and paresthesia reported in others studies, nor was sex distribution. One possible explanation for the initial case was the time of sun exposure in the schoolyard. Subsequent spread of the outbreak was due to psychological and extra-medical factors, including publicity by the mass media. Interestingly the spread was stopped immediately after closure of the school for one day. All the findings of the psychological reports, applied by another researcher group add further weight to this conclusion.
In support to our results, many studies has been reported in which the clinical manifestations are the same that we found. In these reports, the outbreak occurred frequently among women, teenagers, students of elementary and secondary schools and chorus, in whom no organic etiology or precipitant causes can be identified. Some authors have reported that the phenomena is more evident in groups with hormonal changes, rigid discipline used in music bands, and during periods of exams or situations under stress. Such circumstances are more related to the outbreak. Some studies have demonstrated that dysfunctional families, divorced or dead parents, play a mayor role in comparison with other factors such as socioeconomic level, religion or ethnicity. The mechanisms of these events have not been clearly identified. The typical course of a psychogenic epidemic at a workplace progresses from sudden onset, often with dramatic symptoms, to a rapidly attained peak that draws much publicity and is followed by quick disappearance of the symptoms. Over 90% of the affected people are women, and the signs range from dizziness, vomiting, nausea, and fainting to epileptic type seizures, and hyperventilation. Predisposing factors include boredom, physical stressors, poor labor–management relations, impaired interpersonal communications and lack of social support. The rapid spread in the conversion disorder, is by visual contact; the treatment should be directed towards the underlying stressors but the outbreak may be prolonged. In Epidemic Conversion Disorder the abnormality is confined to group interactions. This outbreak shows the importance of psychological support in populations with risk factors of presenting the illness. The social problems among large populations produce an unforgettable painful experience, mainly among teenagers who dealt with the psychological damage without any support.


REFERENCES

  1. ALI A, GUTHRIE E, McDERMOTT N: Mass hysteria: one syndrome or two?. Br J Psychiatry; 170:387-8, 1997.

  2. AMIN Y, HAMDI E, EAPEN V: Mass hysteria in an Arab culture. Int J Soc Psychiatry,; 43(4):303–306, 1997.

  3. BAKER P, SELVEY D: Malathion induced epidemic hysteria in an elementary school. Vet Hum Toxicol, 34(2):156-60, 1992.

  4. BARTHOLOMEW RE. WESSELY S: Protean nature of mass sociogenic illness. BJP, 180:300-06, 2002.

  5. BOSS LP: Epidemic hysteria: a review of the published literature. Epidemiol Rev, 19(2):233-43, 1997.

  6. BRABANT C, MERGLER D, MESSING K: Go take care of yourself, your factory is sick: the place of mass hysteria in the problem of women’s health at work. Sante Ment Que, 15(1):181-204, 1990.

  7. BRODSKY CM: The psychiatric epidemic in the American workplace. Occup Med, 3(4):653-62, 1998.

  8. CHENG-SHENG CH, CHENG-FANG Y, HSIU-FEN L, PINGCHEN Y: Mass hysteria and perceptions of the supernatural among adolescent girl students in Taiwan. J Nerv Ment Dis, 191:122-3, 2003.

  9. CRUZ CHM: Health and work: the case of the gas emissions at the industrial complex of Mayaguez. PR Health Sci J, 9 (1):123–5, 1990.

  10. EGGER HL, COSTELLO JE, ERKANLI A, ANGOLD A: Somatic complaints and psychopathology in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 38:852-60, 1999.

  11. GOH KT: Epidemiological inquiries into a school outbreak of an unusual illness. International J Epidemiol, 16:265-270, 1987.

  12. GOTHE CJ, MOLIN C, NILSSON CG: The environmental somatization syndrome. Psychosomatics, 36(1):1-11, 1995.

  13. HELVIE CO: An epidemic of conversion disorder in a high school. J School Health, 38:505-9, 1968.

  14. HOCKING B: An epidemic of illness in an Indian telephone exchange. J Indian Med Assoc, 88(10):281-5, 1990.

  15. KALLGARD A: Mass hysteria on the Pitcairn island is a strange example of psychogenic epidemic. Lakartidningen, 94(50):4722, 1997.

  16. KLEIN DF: False suffocation alarms, spontaneous panics, and related conditions. An integrative hypothesis. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 50(4):306-17, 1993.

  17. KRUG SE: Mass illness at an intermediate school: toxic fumes or epidemic hysteria?. Pediatr Emerg Care, 8(5):280-2, 1992.

  18. LEVINE RJ, SEXTON DJ, ROMM FJ, WOOD BT, KAISER J: Outbreak of psychosomatic illness at a rural elementary school. Lancet, 21:1500-1503, 1974.

  19. MOSCROP A: Mass hysteria is seen as main threat from bioweapons. BMJ, 323:1023-24, 2001.

  20. MOSS PD, MC EVEDY CP: An epidemic of over breathing among school girls. BMJ, 2:1295-1300, 1966.

  21. OLSON WC: Account of a fainting epidemic in a high school. Psychological Clinic, 18:34-38, 1929.

  22. PASTEL RH: Collective behaviors: mass panic and outbreaks of multiple unexplained symptoms. Mil Med, 166:44-6, 2001.

  23. PHILEN RM, KILBOURNE EM, MCKINLEY TW, PARRISH RG: Mass sociogenic illness by proxy: parentally reported epidemic an elementary school. Lancet, 2:1372-6, 1989.

  24. RADOVANOVIC Z. On the origin of mass casualty incidents in Kosovo, Yugoslavia, in 1990. Eur J Epidemol, 12(1):101-13, 1996.

  25. ROCKNEY RM, LEMKE T: Casualties from a junior senior high school during the Persian Gulf War: toxic poisoning or mass hysteria. J Dev Behav Pediatr, 13(5):339-42, 1992.

  26. RUIZ MT, LOPEZ JM: Mass hysteria in a secondary school. Int J Epidemiol, 17(2):475-6, 1988.

  27. SCHULER EA, PARENTON VI: A recent epidemic of conversion disorder in a Louisiana high school. J Social Psychology, 1:221-235, 1943.

  28. SMALL GW, BORUS JF: The influence of newspaper reports on outbreaks of mass hysteria. Psychiatr Q, 58(4):269-78, 1987.

  29. SMALL GW, PROPPER MW, RANDOLPH ET, ETH S: Mass hysteria among student performers: social relationship as a symptom predictor. Am J Psychiatry, 148(9):1200-5, 1991.

  30. SMALL GW, FEINBERG DT, STEINBERG D, COLLINS MT: A sudden outbreak of illness suggestive of mass hysteria in schoolchildren. Arch Fam Med, 3(8):711-6, 1994.

  31. STRUEWING JP, GRAY GC: An epidemic of respiratory complaints exacerbated by mass psychogenic illness in a military recruit population. Am J Epidemiol, 132(6):1120-9, 1990.

  32. TAN ES: Epidemic conversion disorder. Med J Malaya, 18:72- 76, 1963.

  33. TAYLOR BW, WERBICKI JE: Pseudodisaster: a case of mass hysteria involving 19 schoolchildren. Pediatr Emerg Care, 9(4):216-7, 1993.

  34. TIZON JL, PAÑELLA H, MALDONADO R: ¿Epidemia de histeria, trastorno conversivo epidémico o trastornos somatomorfos epidémicos?. Un nuevo caso de una realidad para el siglo XXI. Atención Primaria, 25:479-88, 2000.

  35. WESSELY S, WARDLE CJ. Mass sociogenic illness by proxy: parentally reported epidemic in an elementary school. Br J Psychiatry, 157:421-4, 1990.

  36. WITTSTOCK B, ROZENTAL L, HENN C: Mass phenomena at a black South African primary school. Hosp Community Psychiatry, 42(8):851-3, 1991.

  37. ANGOLD A, COSTELLO EJ: Structured Interviewing En: Lewis M (ed.). Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 544-554, Philadelphia, 2002.

  38. AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. DSM-IV: Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales. Masson Editores, Barcelona, 1995.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

CÓMO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2006;29