medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2006; 29 (6)

Situations in which women living in a violent relationship condition refer to health care services

Híjar M, Avila-Burgos L, Valdez-Santiago R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 57-64
PDF size: 140.64 Kb.


Key words:

Intentional injuries, Health services utilization, intimate partner abuse, National Survey, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Introduction
Violence is recognized as a Public Health problem around the world. In the specific case of Intimate Partner Abuse, which occurs at home, women are particularly vulnerable to be abused by their partners. In Mexico, as in other countries in Latin America, the systematic study of violence towards women is incipient. However, it is a highly predominant problem, which has a big impact on women’s health, and represents a significant challenge to the Health System demanding health care due to intentional injuries.
This paper analyzed information generated by the first National Survey of violence against women in 2003 (ENVIM, by his name in Spanish).
Objective
The main objective is to identify the factors associated with the health services utilization by women, because of partner abuse.
Methodology
A cross-sectional design was used, including women users of health care services on public institutions all over the country in 2003.
Intimate partner abuse was defined as “the repetitive event of abuse from the male partner side towards the woman, that is characterized by coercive conducts that could include physical, emotional or sexual violence”. It was measure in a scale of 27 items, using the Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA) and the Severity of Violence against Women Scale (SVAWS). Both indexes were validated previously in Mexican population. A factorial analysis was used and the factors that explain the variability were obtained.
The selection of women to be interviewed was done using a probabilistic stratify bi-ethapic sample. For the first one, medical unites were selected, and for the second, women over 14 years old who went to those medical unities to demand any kind of health care services. The ethic considerations were resolved using the next procedures: participants received information about the research objectives and signed an informant consent letter endorsed by the ethical committee of the Institution. They also received a brochure with information about the local institutions where they can go in case of abuse. Interviewers trained in technical areas as well as abuse management using a questionnaire on private spaces did the data collection. The answer rate was of 98%.
The analyzed variables were Socio demographic, search of support on the health staff or reasons for not doing this. An index of socio-economic level categorized as very low, medium and high. Type of institution and services used. The dependent variable was utilization of the health services to attend the injuries due to a partner abuse event, during the last 12 months.
The analysis used was simple and bi-variate using chi square, and binary logistic regression model. The final model included the variables that in the binary showed a value of p‹0.25. We adjusted the model using the Goodness of Fit Test of Pearson.
Results
From 24,958 women that utilized public health services 21% reported to have had a partner abuse event in the last year. From these, only 7.3% utilized health services.
The more important variables were: age between 25 to 34 years old, elementary schooling and women having a job. Of the sample 94% belong to the very low and medium socio-economic levels; almost half of them (47%) do not have health insurance. More than 80% have a partner at present; 7.6% reported severe violence. From those who had injuries, 72% declared to have had just one minor injury (bruises, body aches), 25.5% reported more than one type of injuries, from which 10.8% were severe and required surgery or hospitalization. The type of injuries that demand more utilization of health services were those subsequent to sexual abuse as genital infection and genital bleeding.
Only 45% of the women users’ report to have medical insurance. Less than 6% of abused women talked with the health staff about their abuse situation and the main reason was the lack of trust.
The factors associated to the utilization of health services were ages over 24 years(ORA 1.57, CI 95% 1.9 - 2.06) alcohol intake by the women (ORA =1.66 CI 95% 1.57-1.75) High Socio economic status (ORA =1.29 CI95% 1.07-1.54). The model was adjusted by severity index and to having medical insurance. There were not significative interactions (p›0.15) and the global adjusted model was p= 0.23.
Discussion and conclusions
There is a low percentage of abused women injured that utilize formal medical care. This is a very important result for the identification of prevention and control strategies of the partner abuse problem in the health services. The study shows the existence of different types of injuries or medical problems such as genital infections and bleedings, fainting spells, body aches that provoked on one hand that women did not seek medical attention immediately and on the other that the health staff could not identify this kind of health problems with intimate partner abuse.
There is a group of more vulnerable women who do not use health services to take care of the consequences of abuse, because they are uninsured. This inequality reveals that it is urgent to provide support services to poor women in the country.
The finding about the difficulty for battered women to report their injuries to the health staff because of their lack of trust, agrees with different studies that report the different obstacles found by abused women in facing the health services. The last situation reveals the obstacles to be solved for the NOM implementation too.
It is important to mention the study limitations related with the design utilized, and the selection bias due to the inclusion only of users of services. This situation leaves at one side women with less resources, who confront big obstacles for the utilization of health services, and at the other, women from high socioeconomic levels, who utilize private health services; therefore there is no accuracy the point out differences. The way in which the question about the utilization of health services was made, makes it difficult to know the number of times these were used. This variable must be explored in future studies.
The information generated by the ENVIM allows the Health Sector to define identification-attention strategies of battered women and provides information about the importance of training the health staff to generate trust among in partner-abused women.


REFERENCES

  1. ALLEYNE G: Prevención de la violencia: compromiso para OPS. Reflexiones del Director Rev. Panam Salud Pública. Pan Am J Public Health, 5(4/5):1, 1999.

  2. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines on Domestic Violence. Arch Fam Med, 1:39-47, 1992.

  3. DIARIO OFICIAL DE LA FEDERACIÓN: Norma Oficial Mexicana, “Prestación de servicios de salud. Criterios para la Atención Médica de la Violencia familiar (NOM-190-SSA1-1999) SS, 8 de marzo del 2000.

  4. GARCIA MORENO C: Violencia contra la Mujer: Género y Equidad en Salud. OMS, 6:29-37, 2000.

  5. HIJAR MC, LOPEZ LOPEZ MV, BLANCO J: La violencia y sus repercusiones en la salud; reflexiones teóricas y magnitud del problema en México. Salud Pública México, 39(6):565-572, 1997.

  6. HIJAR MC, LOZANO R, VALDEZ-SANTIAGO R, BLANCO J: Lesiones intencionales como causa de demanda de atención en servicios de urgencia hospitalaria en la Ciudad de México. Salud Mental, 25(1):35-42, 2002.

  7. HOSMER D, LEMESHOW S: Applied Logistic Regression. Segunda Edicón, Ed. John Wiley and Sons, pp 260-352, Nueva York, 2000.

  8. INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL SEGURO SOCIAL: Informe de la Dirección General XCIV. Asamblea General Ordinaria. México, 2004. Disponible en http/www.imss.gob.mx.

  9. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD PUBLICA, SS: Utilización de servicios curativos. En: Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2000. Tomo 1 INSP. México 2003.

  10. INSTITUTO DE SEGURIDAD Y SERVICIOS SOCIALES DE LOS TRABAJADORES DEL ESTADO: Boletín B.0012. México, D.F., 29 de enero de 2002. http://wwwissste.gob.mx/website/comunicados/boletines/2002/b12_2002.html

  11. LOZANO R: Efectos de la violencia doméstica en la salud: Ciudad de México. El Costo del Silencio. Violencia Doméstica en las Américas. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington, 2000.

  12. MARIJA J: NORUSIS. SPSS para Windows. Versión 10. Chicago, 1999.

  13. MEDINA-MORA ME, BERENSON S, NATERA G: El papel del alcoholismo en las violencias. Gaceta Medica México, 135(3):282-287, 1999.

  14. MEDINA-MORA ME, BORGUES-GUIMARAES G, LARA C, RAMOS-LIRA L, ZAMBRANO J: Prevalencia de sucesos violentos y de trastorno por estrés traumático en la población mexicana. Salud Publica Mexico, 47(1):8-22, 2005.

  15. MIRANDA L, HALPERIN D, LIMON F, TUÑON E: Características de la violencia doméstica y las respuestas de las mujeres en una comunidad rural del municipio de Las Margaritas, Chiapas. Salud Mental, 21(6):19-26, 1998.

  16. OLAIZ G, FRANCO A, PALMA O, ECHARRI C, VALDEZSANTIAGO R, HERRERA C: Diseño metodológico de la Encuesta Nacional sobre Violencia contra las Mujeres en México. Salud Publica México, 48(supl 2):s328-s335, 2006.

  17. ORGANIZACION PANAMERICANA DE LA SALUD: La Violencia en las Américas: La Pandemia Social del Siglo XX. Violencia Contra la Mujer. Washington, 15-25, 1996.

  18. RAMIREZ JC, PATINO MC: Algunos aspectos sobre la magnitud y trascendencia de la violencia doméstica contra la mujer: Un estudio piloto. Salud Mental, 20(2):5-15, 1997.

  19. SALTIJERAL MA T, RAMOS L, CABALLERO MA: Las mujeres que han sido víctimas de maltrato conyugal: Tipos de violencia experimentada y algunos efectos de la salud mental. Salud Mental, 21(2):10-18, 1998.

  20. STARK E, FLITCRAFT A: Violence among intimates: an epidemiological review. EN: Van Hasselt(ed.). Handbook of Family Violence. Plenum Publishing Corp., 293-318, Nueva York, 1998.

  21. STATA CORP: STATA, Statistical Software 8.2. College Station, Texas, 2003.

  22. VALDEZ R, JUAREZ C: Impacto de la violencia doméstica en la salud mental de las mujeres: análisis y perspectivas en México. Salud Mental, 21(6):1-10, 1998.

  23. VALDEZ-SANTIAGO R, HIJAR-MEDINA M: Escala para la medición ISBN 03-2006-061610265800-01

  24. VALDEZ-SANTIAGO R, HIJAR M, SALGADO N, RIVERA L y cols.: Escala de violencia e índice de severidad: una propuesta metodológica para medir la violencia de pareja en mujeres mexicanas. Salud Pública México, 48(supl 2):s221-s231, 2006.

  25. WHO. World Report on Violence and Health. Ginebra 87-113, 2002.

  26. WILLIAMS RL: A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56:645-646, 2000.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2006;29