Laparoscopic appendectomy. A treatment standard?

2006, Number 1

Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2006; 71 (1)

Medina FH

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 71-72
PDF size: 31.25 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract

REFERENCES

Franzen T, Anderberg B, Wiren M, Johansson KE. Long term outcome is worse after laparoscopic than after conventional Nissen funduplication. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 1261-8.
Clinical Oucomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 2004; 350: 2050-9.
Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1187-92.
Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, et al. Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 416-23.
Saverland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy a meta–analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998; 383: 289-95.
Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a meta–analysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 545-53.
Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shonnon WD. Meta – analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 1999; 9: 17-26.
Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Dig Surg 2002; 19: 518-22.