medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2008, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2008; 22 (1)

Comparison between Robert Jones dressing and «U» splint in ankle fractures

Romero ZEE, Cadenas TM, Vargas EJM, Huape AMS, García TSO
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 40-44
PDF size: 126.27 Kb.


Key words:

edema, ankle, fracture, pain, immobilization, methods, bandages.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the Robert Jones bandage with the «U» splint in edema control of ankle fractures. Material and methods: A prospective, longitudinal study, open, comparative and randomized made in 32 male patients (72%) and 16 female patients (28%), the average age was 36.9 years. Patients with an ankle fracture within 12 hours of evolution were registered. Both ankles previous to immobilization were measured, dividing the patients in 2 groups. Group 1 were treated with Robert Jones Bandage, and group 2 with «U» splint. The pain previous to immobilization was registered using an analogous visual scale. Twenty-four hours later the circumference and the pain was measured again. Results: Group 1 displayed less edema, mean 17.69 mm, in comparison with group 2, of 8.33 mm (p ≥ 0.36). Pain previous to immobilization in group 1 was a mean of 7 and in group 2 of 5.5 (p ≥ 0.3); 24 hours later, a mean of 2 in both (p ≥ 0.8). Conclusions: There were no significant differences between both immobilization methods.


REFERENCES

  1. Naimer SA, et al: Control of traumatic wound bleeding by compression with a compact elastic adhesive dressing. MM Jul 2006; 172: 664-71.

  2. Stockle, Hoffmann, Sudkamp: Fastest reduction of post-traumatic edema. JBJS Br 1997; 79: 180.

  3. Smith, et al: A randomized controlled trial comparing compression banding and cold therapy in postoperative total knee replacement surgery. ON Marc 2002; 21: 61-6.

  4. Airaksinen, et al: Efficacy of cold gel for soft tissue injury. A prospective, randomized, double blind trial. Am J SM 2003; 31: 680-4.

  5. Boyce, Quigley, Campbell: Management of ankle sprains: a randomized controlled trial of the treatment of inversion surgery using an elastic support bandage or an aircast ankle brace. BJSM 2005; 39: 91-6.

  6. Cedidi, Ingiani: Compression therapy after complex soft tissue trauma and flap coverage. EJMR Feb 2006; 11: 85-9.

  7. Beekman R, Watson: Bosworth fracture-dislocation and resultant compartment syndrome, a case report. JBJS Am 2003; 11: 2211-4.

  8. Bañuls, Curwen, Crawshaw: Ankle fractures and rapid reduction of swelling by intermittent pneumatic compression: a preoperative approach. SAOA 2000; 83: 3-10.

  9. Gibbons, et al: Cryotherapy compared with Robert Jones bandage after total knee replacement, a prospective, randomized trial. IO 2001; 25: 250-2.

  10. Lee, et al: Compression therapy, effects of posture and application techniques on initial pressure delivered by bandages of different physical properties. EJVES May 2006; 31: 542-52.

  11. James D, Axon D, MacOllister C: The Robert Jones bandage. JBJS Am 1986; 5: 776-9.

  12. Eagle M: Compression bandaging. Nurs Stand 2001; 15(38); 47-52.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2008 Ene-Feb;22