Granados RR, Díez GMP, Coronado ZR, Chávez AD

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 63-68
PDF size: 110.04 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Describing the frequency of the coxo-femoral illness attended in the National Institute of Rehabilitation in a period of a year. Methods: I am carried out a descriptive, longitudinal, prospective study and observational, in the period understood of October from the 2002 to October of the 2003. The variables they were studied and their presentation. Results: 303 patients in the National Institute of Rehabilitation with illness are captured coxofemoral of 1,107 of all the problems of coxalgia. Fifty nine males (29%) and 243 females (71%), average wound of acetabulum 235 (78%), femoral head 49 (16%) and femoral neck 18 (6%): 195 coxarthrosis: GIII: 99, GIV: 77, and GV: 19: 132 with march without use of ortesis, 138 with ortesis and in chair of wheels 33. One hundred and eight patients operated: Prosthesis of hip 62%, nails and plates 27%, osteotomies 7%, exeresis of femoral head 4%. Conclusion: The problem coxofemoral is very important in our population since affects economically active, young patients and the cost of the integral attention is high, by the degree of disability, being becoming a problem of health publishes. Complications of the surgeries were: 36 patients. Twelve with slackening of the prosthesis, 7 infection, 11 with wound of sciatic nervus and 6 break of material or prosthesis.

REFERENCES

1. Rampon S. Formes etiologiques de la coxathroses. Viev Med 1970; 2(51): 2685-2704.

2. Darnault A, Parance C. Coxartrosis. Enciclopedia Médico-Quirúrgica. 1998; 25-295-A-10.

3. Alfram PD. An epidemiologic study of cervical and trochanteric fractures of the femur in urban population. Acta Orthop Scand 1985: 65.

4. Arbelo R, Lainez S y cols. Epidemiología de las fracturas de la extremidad proximal del fémur en Gran Canaria (1989-1993). Rev Ortop Traumatol 1999; 2: 107-112.

5. García JD, Bravo PA y cols. Capacidad funcional postoperatoria en pacientes jóvenes con artroplastia total de cadera no cementada, en el Hospital General de México. Rev Mex Traum 1997; 11(6): 432-34.

6. Meneses F, Rea R y cols. Accidentes en cuatro hospitales generales del Distrito Federal. Salud Pública 1993; 35(5): 448-55.

7. Yoshino S, Shiga H et al. Long term outcome of total joint arthroplasty in non ambulatory patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology 1999; 26: 1076-79.

8. Gallardo G, Reséndiz A. Criterio para el tratamiento de las fracturas transcervicales del fémur. Revisión epidemiológica. Rev Ortop Traum 1999; 13(6): 541-547.

9. Fernández PLJ. Evolución a largo plazo de la luxación traumática de la cadera en el hospital ABC. Informe preliminar. Rev Mex Ortop Traum 1998; 12(4): 320-323.

10. Gutiérrez LM y cols. Perspectivas para el desarrollo de la geriatría en México. Salud Publica 1990; 32(6): 693-71.

11. Molina ZCM, Bravo BPA. Estudio epidemiológico. Pacientes internados en el Servicio de Ortopedia, pabellón 106, del Hospital General de México. Septiembre de 1985 a febrero de 1992. Rev Mex Ortop Traum 1998; 12(5): 416-20.

12. Igil-Orbezo F, Preciado AME y cols. Fractura de cadera en el anciano con alteraciones psiquiátricas. Experiencia en el Hospital Español de México. Rev Mex Ortop Trauma 1999; 13(6): 519-22.

13. Rivera HV, Mejía RC y cols. Prótesis total de cadera cementada. Experiencia con cinco tipos de prótesis totales. Rev Mex Ortop Traum 1999; 13(6): 579- 582.

14. Oostveen J, Prvo R et al. Early detection of sacroileitis on magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent development of sacroileitis on plain radiography. A prospective, longitudinal study. The Journal of Rheumatology 1999; 26(9): 1953-63.

15. Hernández V, Barrera C. Sistema de evaluación de los resultados en las artroplastias. Rev Ortop Traumatol 1999; 4: 245-51.