medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Pediatría

ISSN 0035-0052 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

1998, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Pediatr 1998; 65 (4)

Infecciones de las vías urinarias, no complicadas, en niños. Estudio comparativo del empleo de fosfomicina/trometamol con respecto al uso de amoxacilina

Padilla RN, Díaz GR, Muñoz RM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 152-156
PDF size: 120.19 Kb.


Key words:

Urinary tract infections, Escherichia coli, fosfomycin/trometamol, amoxacillin.

ABSTRACT

We studied urinary tract infection 100 children with age between 1 and 15 years, all of them had a urine culture with a bacteriological count higher than 100,000 CFU/mL. They were randomized in two groups, the group I received fosfomycin/trometamol (one dose one day) and the group II received amoxacillin, in three daily doses for 10 days. Clinical evaluation were done at the 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 days after to begin the treatment; we evaluate the improvement of the clinical data and the urine culture was repited three days after ending the treatment. In group I we obtained 44 (97.7%) success and 1 (2.3%) clinical failure; in the bacteriological efficacy we obtained 40 (88.9%) success and 5 (11.1%) failures. The group of amoxacillin was formed by 55 patients; the clinical efficacy was obtained in 48 (87.3%) success and 7 (12.7%) failures, after 11 days of follow up; in the bacteriological efficacy, we obtained 38 (69.1%) success and 17 (30.9%) failures. In the group fosfomycin/trometamol there was a more quickly improvement (3-5 days) in comparison with 5-7 days obtained with amoxacillin. We concluded that the fosfomycin/trometamol is a good option in the treatment of UTI noncomplicated and the patients complied the treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Winberg J, Andersen H, Bergström T, Jacobsson B, Larson H, Lincoln K. Epidemiology of symptomatic urinary tract infec-tion in childhood. Acta Ped Scand 1974; 252 (Supl): 1-20.

  2. Guiscafré H. Infección de las vías urinarias. En: Kumate J, Gutiérrez G, Muñoz O, Santos JI, eds. Manual de infectología. 12a ed., México, Francisco Méndez Cervantes, editor, 1990; 410-417.

  3. Grünberg J. Infección del aparato urinario. En: Meneghello J, ed. Diálogos en pediatría II. Santiago de Chile, Publicaciones Técnicas Mediterráneo 1990; 2: 162-176.

  4. Burns M, Burns J, Krieger J. Infecciones pediátricas de las vías urinarias. Diagnóstico, clasificación e importancia. Clin Ped de NortAme 1987; 34(5): 1189-1200.

  5. Guggenbichler J, Sperl W. Single-dose therapy of urinary tract infection in infants and children. Facts and perspectives. J Eur Urol 1987; 13(Supl. 1): 17-21.

  6. Jadal V, Hansson S. Urinary tract infections in infants and children. En: New, Williams, (eds). New trends in urinary tract infections. Int Symp Rome 1988: 43-47.

  7. Varese L. Trometamol salt of fosfomycin versus netilmicin: randomized multicenter study in children’s lower urinary tract infections. J Eur Urol 1987; 13 (supl. 1): 119-121.

  8. Padilla N, Figueroa RC, Rivera MR, Muñoz M. Infecciones no complicadas de vías urinarias en niños. Estudio comparativo entre fosfomicina/trometamol y trimetoprim sulfametoxazol. Rev Enf Infec Pediatr 1997; 11: 5-9.

  9. Careddu P, Borzani M, Varotto F, Garlaschi L, Fontana P. Treatment of lower urinary tract infections in children: single dose fosfomycin/trometamol versus pipemidic acid. Chemotherapy 1987; 6: 290-294.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Pediatr. 1998;65