Molina GAA, González MMT, Aranda EOA

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 204-209
PDF size: 198.79 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Sacral fractures are uncommon injuries; published cases constitute less than 1% of all the spinal fractures. The vertical sacral fractures are more common. Based on Denis’s classification for sacral fractures, those that present on area III, transverse, are still the less frequent ones and they are associated in 57% to a neurological deficit. They are link with high energy trauma. A delay in diagnosis and treatment can lead to neurologic deterioration and pain. Case presentation: A 16-years-old boy fell from a moving vehicle, and suffered direct trauma to the dorsal and sacral region. He was initially assisteed in a second level hospital unit for lumbar pain, inability to walk and was unable to urinate; 4 days later to the accident he was transferred to our institution where we carried out diagnostic protocol finding a high transverse displaced fracture at S2 level with associated neurological deficit. We carried out surgical procedure, which consisted on open reduction, with a posterior approach, descompressive laminectomy and fixation with dynamic compression plate (D.C.P.) 4.5 mm in diameter. Six weeks after the surgical procedure the patient was able to walk with partial support, clear improvement in strength and sphincter control. Discussion: Transverse fractures of the sacrum are uncommon fractures; still in trauma centers the experience is limited. At the moment there is no consensus between conservative or surgical tretment modalities according the type of sacral fracture. Conclusion: Today´s evidence suggests that consideration must be taken on the risk of a neurological lesion associated through the surgical stabilization in comparison to the stability of the fracture site.

REFERENCES

1. Herkowitz H, Garfin S: Columna vertebral, cuarta edición, México, McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 2000, vol. II, 931-1117.

2. Sommer C: Fixation of transverse fractures of the sternum and sacrum with the locking compression plate system, two case reports. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19; 487-90.

3. Vaccaro A, Kim D: Diagnosis and management of sacral spine fractures. JBJS 2004; 86A: 165-75.

4. Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T: Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop 1988; 227: 67-81.

5. Gibbons KJ, Soloniuk DS, Razack N: Neurological injury and patterns of sacral fractures. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 889-893.

6. Sabiston CP, Wing PC: Sacral fractures: classification and neurologic implications. J Trauma 1986; 26: 1113-5.

7. Nork SE, Jones CB, Harding SP, Mirza SK: Percutaneous stabililization of shaped sacral fractures using iliosacral screws: technique and early results. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 15: 238-16.

8. Susuki K, Mochida J: Operative treatment of the transverse fracture-dislocation at the S1-S2 level. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 44: 359-63.

9. Fardon D: Displaced transverse fracture of the sacrum with nerve root injury: report of the case with successful operative management. J Trauma 1979; 192: 119-20.

10. Fisher R: Sacral fracture with compression of cauda equine: surgical treatment. J Trauma 1988; 28: 1678-80.

11. Hessmann M, Degreif J, Mayer A: Transverse sacral fracture with intrapelvic intrusion of the lumbosacral spine: case report and review of the literature. J Trauma 2000; 49: 754-7.

12. Sapkas G, Makris A, Korres D: Anteriorly displaced transverse fractures of the sacrum in adolescents: report of two cases. Eur Spine J 1997; 6: 342-6.

13. Robles LA, Plantillas E: An unusual transverse sacral fracture treated with early decompression: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 5: 546-9.