medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología

Anales de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oftalmología y Archivos de la Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 3

Next >>

Rev Mex Oftalmol 2006; 80 (3)

Experiencia en vitrectomía a dos puertos

Rivera-Sempértegui JO, Hernández F, Gallegos-Valencia A, Navarro-López P, Ochoa-Contreras D
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 109-111
PDF size: 38.42 Kb.


Key words:

Vitrectomy, retinal detachment.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To describe our experience with two-port vitrectomy, using binocular ophthalmoscopy as a visualization system, for the management of several vitreoretinal pathologies.
Methods: Retrospective, longitudinal, observational and descriptive study of 234 patients.
Results: Average age was 58 years, and median follow up of 23.6 months. Diagnoses were traction retinal detachment (RD) due to diabetic retinopathy, rhegmatogenous RD, recidivated RD, RD secondary to penetrating ocular wound with foreign body, epiretinal membrane, and others. Average baseline, Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was Count Fingers 1 meter.
As tamponade we used silicon oil in 57.5%, SF6 in 4.9% and C3F8 in 4%. Anatomic success with one procedure was obtained in 90.7%. We had recidivated RD in 9.3% of cases with the first procedure. Average final BCVA was Count Fingers 2 meters.
The more frequent postoperative complications were macular fibrosis, papillary atrophy and glaucoma.
Conclusion: Two- port vitrectomy assisted by indirect ophthalmoscopy is a technique that can be used for different vitreoretinal pathologies, as a main visualization instrument and its main disadvantage is a difficult learning curve.


REFERENCES

  1. Poole TA, Poler S, Sudarsky RD. A variable focus telescopic instrument for indirect ophthalmoscopy with increased magnification and stereopsis. Am J Ophthalmol 1978; 86(5):638-43.

  2. Friberg TR. Laser photocoagulation using binocular indirect ophthalmoscope laser delivery systems. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1995; 26(6):549-59.

  3. Kylstra JA, Holdren DN. Indirect ophthalmoscope perimetry in patients with retinal detachment or retinoschisis. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 119(4):521-22.

  4. Reategui EG, Murillo LS y cols. Enlarged diode laser spot using indirect ophthalmoscope delivery in conjunction with indocyanine green to treat large choroidal neovascularizations. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2003; 34(6):446-50.

  5. Benner JD, Huang M, Morse LS, Hjelmeland LM, Landers MB 3rd. Comparision of photocoagulation with the argon, kryoton, and diode laser indirect ophthalmoscopes in rabbit eyes. Ophthalmology 1992; 99:1554-1563.

  6. Whitacre MM. Clinical applications of auto indirect ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 103:767-769.

  7. Mainster MA, Reichel E y cols. Ophthalmoscopy and vitreoretinal surgery in patients with an ARRAY refractive multifocal intraocular lens implant. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2002; 33(1):74-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2006;80