medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2003, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2003; 26 (1)

¿Por qué delinquen las mujeres? Parte II. Vertientes analíticas desde una perspectiva de género

Romero MM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 38
Page: 32-41
PDF size: 382.50 Kb.


Key words:

Deliquency, women, gender, power, violence, equity.

ABSTRACT

The problem of women who break the law, has become each time more evident. However, traditional theories related to the reasons that lead to delinquency have been basically developed, considering mainly male experience. These findings give little consideration to the features of the women’s experience and delinquency.
Research done within a gender perspective has made important contributions to the epistemological level of criminology, as far as it has facilitated to redefine concepts while questioning them, and enriching paradigms.
In the 1980’s, a series of works with gender perspective emerged. Gender, according to West and Zimmerman (1987) is “the activity of managing situated conduct in light of normative conceptions of attitudes and activities appropriate for one’s sex category…therefore gender is not a set of traits, or a variable, not a role, but the product of social doing of some sort as constituted through interactions”.
A generic organization is one in which control, identity, meaning of actions, emotions and advantage has patterns that differentiate between man and woman (masculine and feminine).
Inherent to gender are the concepts of sexism and patriarchal power. Patriarchy and its privileges stand as a part of culture, therefore they are present in criminology, criminal and criminalization processes and in the way in which man and women cope with the law.
In this work women criminality is described and analyzed from a gender perspective, taking in consideration four analytical axiss: power, controls, violence and equity.
Power, according to López-Rey (1983) is the capacity, ability, energy or force for doing or not doing, provoke or prevent something that is meant to be beneficial or not. Elements that favor its action are corruption, ideology, insatisfaction over some circumstances or situations that affect some different groups. Power understood in this way can be political, ideological, economical, scientific or of other condition. Power has control over more than half of the population: women, children and elder people.
Power is executed through the second axis, that is social control with two modalities: informal controls (persuasive-educative) and formal (repressive). Among them, the informal ones are more significative for women because they are severe and effective in conytollig reputation, body, space and activities' restriction, in order to define women as either good or bad.
Women who disobey, run away from home, are sexually active or have become pregnant against their father or husband’s desires, and also “inadequate” mothers, are more vulnerable to the formal controls that the State executes through punishment or psychiatric labelling. This means that imprisonement or segregation are formally controlled.
One way to control women’s lives is through fear, by means of violence. This procedure becomes the third axis. Women who have suffered violence no matter if this experience was in the childhood or in their adult life, have more risks of suffering from depression, anxiety, stress, pain, phobias, substance abuse and negative behavior in relation with their health (Campbell, Kub y Rose, 1996; Galbraith y Rubinstein 1996; Romero y cols, 2001; Staton, Leukefely y Logan, 2001).
Sexual and physical abuse increase for women the risk of being arrested for violent behaviors as well as some other “deviation” mechanisms like run away from home, cognitive ability deficit, involving with delinquent partners and failure in learning psychological abilities to attain a successful adult development (Widom, 2000).
Finally, from a gender perspective, anything within the social and economical system that systematically doesn’t allow or delays the access of men or women to universal rights, constitutes a gender inequity. Delinquent women not only do not exercise activities or profit from goods that they deserve, but are also excluded from most possibilities of attaining them, that is to say, they live in social exclusion.
Therefore, if the social unequal conditions that prevail for women who break the law, are not taken into consideration by the law, at the end, a partial justice will be imposed. While equal sanctions be applied to conditions that are not the same, the result will be a real and deep inequality.
In order to attain an adequate prevention of feminine delinquency, it is necessary to consider, from a gender perspective: 1) Physical security and healthy development oriented towards diminishing poverty, violence, inadequate health care and substance abuse; 2) validation of affections, respect and a healthy emotional environment, in order to avoid imposed transgressions; 3) development of diverse feminine role models in order to avoid racism and sexism; 4) sexual and reproductive health freedom for women, in order to avoid sexual abuse, exploitation and images or feminine values imposed through “reputation” and body control and 5) possibility of exercising the right to work, to have an adequate life level, to enjoy social security, good health, household, education and culture in order to prevent exclusion.


REFERENCES

  1. AKER J: Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gender Society, 4:139-158, 1990.

  2. AZAOLA E: Prisiones para mujeres: un enfoque de género. La Ventana. Revista Estudio Género, 2:35-52, 1995.

  3. AZAOLA E: Las Mujeres Olvidadas. Un estudio sobre la situación actual de las cárceles de mujeres en la República Mexicana. Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos. El Colegio de México. México, 1996.

  4. AZAOLA E: El Delito de ser Mujer. Hombres y mujeres homicidas en la ciudad de México: historias de vida. Ed. CIESAS y Plaza y Valdez, México, 1996.

  5. BAVESTRELLO Y, CORTES P: Mujeres en conflicto con el sistema penal. El caso de Chile. En: Del Olmo R (ed.). Criminalidad y Criminalización de la Mujer en la Región Andina. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo PNUD. Comisión Andina de Juristas. Fundación José Félix Ribas. Ed. Nueva Sociedad, p.231, Venezuela, 1998.

  6. BARTKY SL: Foucault, feminismo y la modernización del poder patriarcal. En: Larrauri E (ed.). Mujeres, Derecho Penal y Criminología. Ed. Siglo XXI, Madrid, 1994.

  7. BELKNAP J: The Invisible Woman. Gender, Crime and Justice. Ed. Wadsworth. USA, 2001.

  8. BURGESS A, HARTMAN C, McCORMACK A: Abused to abuser: antecedents of socially deviant behaviors. Am J Psychiatry, 144(11):1431-1436, 1987.

  9. CAMPELL J, KUB J, ROSE L: Depression in battered women. JAMA, 51(3):106-110, 1996.

  10. CAMPBELL N: Using Women. Gender, Drug Policies and Social Justice. Ed. Routledge. Gran Bretaña, 2000.

  11. CARLEN P: Criminal women and criminal justice: the limits to and potential of, feminist and left realist perspectives. En: Mathews R, Young J (eds.). Issues in Realist Criminology. Ed. Sage, 51-69, Londres, 1992.

  12. CARLEN P: Women and Punishment. The struggle for justice. Ed. William Publishing. Devon, 2002.

  13. DALY K, CHESNEY-LIND M: Feminisms and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5:497-538, 1988.

  14. DAVIS NJ, FAITH K: Las mujeres y el estado: modelos de control social en transformación. En: Larrauri E (ed). Mujeres, Derecho Penal y Criminología. Ed. Siglo XXI, 109-139, México, 1994.

  15. DEL OLMO R: Teorías sobre la criminalidad femenina. En: Del Olmo (ed.). Criminalidad y Criminalización de la Mujer en la Región Andina. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo PNUD, Comisión Andina de Juristas, Fundación José Félix Ribas. Editorial Nueva Sociedad, Venezuela, 1998.

  16. GALBRAITH S, RUBINSTEIN G: Alcohol, drugs and domestic violence: confronting barriers to changing practice and policy. JAMA, 51(3):115-117, 1996.

  17. GALVEZ T: Aspectos Económicos de la Equidad de Género. Serie mujer y desarrollo. No. 35. CEPAL, ECLAC, Naciones Unidas, Santiago de Chile, 2001.

  18. HIRIGOYEN MF: El Acoso Moral. El maltrato psicológico en la vida cotidiana. Ed. Paidós. Barcelona, Buenos Aires, México, 1999.

  19. HUDSON B: Gender issues in penal policy and penal theory. En: Carlen P (ed.). Women and Punishment. The struggle for justice. Ed. William Publishing. UK, 2002.

  20. LARRANDART L: Control social, derecho penal y género. En: Birgin H (ed.). Las Trampas del Poder Punitivo. El género del derecho penal. Ed. Biblos. Colección Identidad, Mujer y Derecho. Buenos Aires, 2000.

  21. LARRAURI E: Control informal: las penas de las mujeres..... En: Larrauri E (ed.). Mujeres, Derecho Penal y Criminología. Ed. Siglo XXI, Madrid, 1994.

  22. LAGARDE M: Claves feministas para el poderío y la autonomía de las mujeres. Memoria. Ed. Puntos de Encuentro. Managua, 1997.

  23. LEES S: Aprender a amar, reputación sexual, moral y control social de las jóvenes. En: Larrauri E (ed.). Mujeres, Derecho Penal y Criminología. Ed. Siglo XXI, Madrid, 1994.

  24. LOPEZ-REY M: Criminalidad y Abuso de Poder. Ed. Tecnos. Salamanca, 1983.

  25. PEREZ DEL CAMPO A: Una Cuestión Incomprendida. El Maltrato a la Mujer. Ed. Horas y horas. Madrid, 1995.

  26. RICHIE B, JOHNSEN C: Abuse histories among newly incarcerated in a New York city jail. JAMA, 51(3):111-115, 1996.

  27. ROMERO M, AGUILERA RM: ¿Por qué delinquen las mujeres? Perspectivas teóricas tradicionales. Parte I. Salud Mental, 25(5):10-22, 2002.

  28. ROMERO M: Estudio de las adicciones en mujeres y su relación con otros problemas de salud mental. Tesis de doctorado en antropología. Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,1998.

  29. ROMERO M, MONDRAGON L, CHERPITEL C, MEDINA-MORA ME, BORGES G: Characteristics of Mexican women attending the emergency care unit. Alcohol consumption and related problems. Salud Pública México, 43(6):537-543, 2001.

  30. SAEZ C: Violencia y sociedad patriarcal. En: Maquiera V, Sánchez (comp.). Violencia y Sociedad Patriarcal. Ed. Pablo Iglesias, Madrid, 1990.

  31. SALINAS BL: Derecho, Género e Infancia. Mujeres, Niños, Niñas y Adolescentes en los Códigos Penales de América Latina y el Caribe Hispano. Ed. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Fondo de Desarrollo de las Naciones Unidas para la Mujer, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, 2002.

  32. SCHUR E: Labeling Deviant Behavior. Its Sociological Implications. Ed. Harper & Row, Nueva York, 1971.

  33. SOMMERS I, BASKIN D: The situational context of violent female offending. J Research Crime Delinquency, 30(2):136- 162, 1993.

  34. STATON M, LEUKEFELD C, LOGAN TK: Health service utilization and victimization among incarcerated female substance users. Substance Use Misuse, 36(6-7):701-716, 2001.

  35. WEST C, ZIMMERMAN D: Doing gender. Gender Society, 9:8-37, 1987.

  36. WIDOM C: Childhood victimization and the derailment of girls and women to the criminal justice system. Research on women and girls in the Justice System: plenary papers on the 1999 conference on Criminal Justice Research and evaluation- Enhancing policy and practice through research, National Institute of Justice, 3:27-36, 2000.

  37. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: Women’s Mental Health. Empirical Evidence. Ginebra, 2000.

  38. ZAFFARONI ER: El discurso feminista y el poder punitivo. En: Birgin H (comp.) Las Trampas del Poder Punitivo. El género del derecho penal. Ed. Biblos. Colección Identidad, Mujer y Derecho. Buenos Aires, 2000.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2003;26