medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2007; 52 (2)

Nasal mucus eosinophil implications in patients with possible diagnosis of allergic rhinitis

Vallejo MG, Téllez GRM, González CA, Mena AJC, Reynoso DVM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 58-62
PDF size: 216.20 Kb.


Key words:

allergic rhinitis, eosinophil cells.

ABSTRACT

Background: Eosinophil cells are white blood family cells (leucocytes) implicated in multiple ailments derived from bone marrow.
Objective: To demonstrate the utility of the eosinophil cells in nasal mucus technique, in diagnosing allergic rhinitis.
Patients and methods: Patients’ total was 73: 32 male and 41 female, in an age range that goes from 0 to 65 years. It was applied a protocol using the following tests: eosinophil cells in nasal mucus, hematic biometry, IgE in serum and 3-series coproparasitoscopic.
Results: Almost 40% of the patients have positive diagnosis of probable allergic rhinitis. There is minimal female predominance (56.1%) over male (43.8%). The prevailing age range was 0 to 10 years.
Conclusions: Eosinophil cells test in nasal mucus by itself is not definitive but an important diagnostic support element because it allows, as a protocol part with other tests, a diagnosis.


REFERENCES

  1. Palmero DJ. Neumonías eosinofílicas. 1ª ed. Buenos Aires: Asociación de Alergia, Asma e Inmunología, 1999;pp:1-4.

  2. Noemí HI. Eosinofilia y parasitosis. Rev Chil Pediatr 1999;70(5):435-40.

  3. Tafur LA, Victoria J, Saa ND. Características del asma bronquial en niños de Cali. Colo Med 1997;28(1):10-15.

  4. Nanda R, reviewer. Absolute eosinophil count. In: University of Maryland Medical Center. English Medical Encyclopedia [online]. Baltimore: UMMC, 2006. [Cited in May, 1, 2005]. Available online at: URL: http://www.umm.edu/ency/article/003649.htm

  5. Lynch MJ, Raphael SS, Mellor LD, Spare PD, et al. Métodos de laboratorio. 2ª ed. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 1972;p:722.

  6. Levy MA, Gleich JG, Sandborn JW, Tremaine JW, et al. Increased eosinophil granule proteins in gut lavage fluid from patients with inflammatory bowel diseasse. Mayo Clin Proc 1997;72:117-23.

  7. Wang J, Whetsell M, Klein JR. Local hormone networks and intestinal T cell homeostasis. Science 1997;275(5308):1937-9.

  8. Vázquez NF, Casador RJS, Salazar HF. Eosinófilos en sangre periférica y moco nasal, en sujetos asmáticos y sanos. Rev Alergia Mex 1998;45(1):4-8.

  9. Arzuaga OJ, Segura MNH, Martínez Cairo-Cueto S. Evaluación de los eosinófilos en el moco nasal de pacientes con rinitis alérgica perenne durante la prueba de provocación nasal. Rev Alergia Mex 1993;40(6):139-41.

  10. Vázquez N, Sánchez NHR. Instrumento diagnóstico para la rinitis alérgica. Rev Alergia Mex 2000;47(4):130-3.

  11. Reyes MA. Rinitis alérgica en niños. Su relación con alergenos en el ambiente. Colo Med 1996;27:143-5.

  12. Meneses GA, Garduño LAL, Aguilar PJL, De la Garza SJ. Histiocitosis de las células de Langerhans de lengua. Departamento de oncología médica, cabeza y cuello, Instituto Nacional de Cancerológica, México D.F. 2002.

  13. American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology, Sinusitis, mayo 2005;pp:1-3.

  14. Inflamación y reparación, definición y perspectivas, Mayo 2005;pp:1-18.

  15. Mendoza de Morales T, Carrasquel de López B. Sinusitis pediátrica, Otorrinolaringólogos del Instituto de ORL, San Bernardino, Caracas, Venezuela.

  16. Belkind-Valdovinos U, Belkind-Gerson J, Sánchez-Francia D, Espinoza-Ruiz MM, et al. Evaluación de la nitazoxanida en dosis única y por tres días en parasitosis intestinal. Salud Publica Mex 2004;46(4):333-40.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Otorrinolaringología. 2007;52