medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Angiología

Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Angiol 2007; 35 (3)

Lower-limb critical ischemia. Impact of treatment in quality of ife

Rosas FMÁ, Zarraga RJL, Serrano LJA, Huerta HH, Soriano AG, Antúnez GF, Jordán LJC, Cisneros TM, Sánchez NN
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 95-101
PDF size: 155.52 Kb.


Key words:

Lower-limb critical ischemia, quality of life, short form 36 health questionnaire.

ABSTRACT

Background: For the past decades morbidity and mortality rates from lower-limb critical ischemia have been constantly high. This can be explained partially because of the co-morbidities associated with the disease (myocardial infarction, stroke, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, hypertension, etc). Since 1990 long-term quality of life as a parameter of successful treatment for critical lower-limb ischemia has get particular attention in the medical literature. Positive impact from surgical treatment (revascularization) has been reported in many American and European papers. There is a lack of such studies in Mexico. It was the author´s purpose to provide an insight in this topic.
Objectives: To determine the impact of quality of life from surgical treatment (revascularization) in patients with lower-limb critical ischemia.
Methods: This is a prospective, longitudinal, comparative and open study. Since March 2004 to August 2006 patients diagnosed with critical lower-limb ischemia treated in our service were included. Short form 36 health questionnaire was applied to all patients before treatment at the time of hospital admission and 6 months after the surgical procedure was done to evaluate quality of life. Short form 36 health questionnaire is the most widely used instrument to evaluate health status. It explores 8 specific topics of health status: physical performance, social performance, function limitations, organic and emotional issues, mental health, vigor, pain and health status self-perception. Scale punctuation goes from 0 to 100, been the highest score related with a better quality of life. Descriptive and inferential statistic analysis were performed to evaluate the results.
Results: 45 patients were included in the study. There were 24 females and 21 males. Age range was from 55 to 88 years (mean age 69.8 years). 37 patients presented with lower limb necrosis and 7 patient presented with pain at rest. The following surgical procedures were done: 2 femoral-femoral bypasses; 23 femoral-poplyteal bypasses, 3 aortobifemoral bypasses; 3 poplyteal bypasses and 4 extraanatomic bypasses. At 6-month follow up 37 patients remained major amputation-free and 8 patients had lost their extremities. Short form 37 questionnaire results were: Physical problems: Admission mean 34.24, DS 9.43, 6-month mean 64.42, DS 10.20; function limitations: Admission mean 36.48, DS 11.41 6-month mean 69.35, DS 10.22; pain: Admission mean 36.96, DS 6.78; 6-month mean 72.31, DS 9.85; health status self-perception: Admission mean 35.68, DS 12.19; 6-month mean 73.15, DS 10.84; vigor Admission mean 52.44, DS 11.99; 6-month mean 75.66, DS 8.65; social performance: Admission mean 53.88, DS 11.06; 6-month mean 76.91, DS 9.80; emotional issues: Admission mean 52.77, DS 12.08 6-month mean 78.68, DS 9.20; mental health: Admission mean 53.31, DS 11.78; 6-month mean 79.44, DS 6.75; total mental health score: Admission mean 53.10, DS 9.21; 6-month mean 77.68, DS 7.01; total physical health score: Admission mean 35.84, DS 7.33; 6-month mean 69.83, DS 9.00. Inferential statistic analysis (couple variables t-Student). When comparing the short form 36 questionnaire score results, improvement in quality of life after surgical treatment was demonstrated (mean 6-month follow up; p ‹ 005, IC 95%).
Conclusions: Lower-limb critical ischemia decreases quality of life. Because of this, it is important to provide an expeditious and an effective treatment for this entity. Surgical revascularization provides an important improvement in physical and mental health which translates in a better quality of life. It is important to assess quality of life as a parameter of successful treatment in lower-limb critical ischemia and in others diseases in which the vascular surgeon gets involved.


REFERENCES

  1. Domandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TransAtlantic Inter Society Consensus (TASC). Eur J Vas Endovasc Surg 2000; 19(Suppl. A): 1-244.

  2. Catalano M. Epidemiology of critical limb ischaemia: North Italian data. Eur J Med 1993; 2: 11-14.

  3. The Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Critical limb ischaemia: management and outcome. Report of a national survey. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995; 10: 108-13.

  4. Hart WM, Guest JF. Critical limb ischemia: the burden of illness in the UK. Br J Med Econ 1995; 8: 211-21.

  5. Panayiotopoulos YP, Tyrrell MR, Owen SE, Reidy JF, Taylor PR. Outcome and cost analysis after femorocrural and femoropedal grafting for critical limb ischemia. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 207-12.

  6. Singh S, Evans L, Datta D, Gaines P, Beard JD. The costs of managing lower limb-threatening ischaemia. Eur J Endovasc Surg 1996; 12: 359-62.

  7. Levi L, Anderson L, La tensión psicosocial. Población, ambiente y calidad de vida. México, DF: El Manual Moderno; 1980.

  8. Lawton MP, Moss M, Fulcomer M. A research and service oriented Multilevel assessment instrument. Journal of Gerontology 1982; 37: 91-9.

  9. Slevin ML, Plant HY, Lynch D. Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer 1988; 57: 109-12.

  10. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 – item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.

  11. Mchorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring psysical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247-63.

  12. Mchorney CA, Ware JE, Lu R, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 item short form health survey (SF-36) III. Tests of data quality scaling assumtions and reliabity across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40-66.

  13. Velarde JE, Avila FC. Evaluación de la calidad de vida. Salud Pública Mex 2002; 44: 349-61.

  14. Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. La versión española del SF- 36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin 1995; 104: 771-6.

  15. Zúñiga MA, Carrillo Jiménez GT, Fos PJ, Gandek B, Medina Moreno MR. Evaluación del estado de salud con la encuesta SF-36: resultados preliminares en México. Salud Pública Mex 1999; 41: 110-18.

  16. Duran-Arenas L, Gallegos- Carrillo K, Escudero G, Martínez-Salgado H. Hacia una base normativa mexicana en la medición de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, mediante el formato corto 36. Salud Pública Mex 2004; 46: 306-15.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Angiol. 2007;35