medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Universitaria

Medicina Universitaria
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 35

<< Back Next >>

Med Univer 2007; 9 (35)

Prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension in low-income level urban patients in Monterrey, Mexico

Cárdenas IL, Villarreal PJZ, Rocha RF, Lavalle GF, Silva LDE, Montes VJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 64-67
PDF size: 95.62 Kb.


Key words:

Prevalence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, low-income urban population.

ABSTRACT

Background: Hyperglycemia is a characteristic sign of several diseases. In the case of type 2 diabetes, it has an effect on 90 to 95% of the patients. It produces a high morbidity, incapacity and even death.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, pre-diabetes and hypertension in a low-income urban area in Monterrey, Mexico.
Method: A random, cross-sectional study was done in a low-income urban population in Monterrey, Mexico. Patients who had participated in a baseline glycemic study from 1992 to 1993 were re-examined. The concentration of capillary and plasmatic glucose on fasting and two hour post-load oral glucose (75 g) were determined. The diagnoses were established following the criteria of the American Diabetes Association 2004. Multiple regression analyses were done to infer the factors related with glycemia; the confidence interval was 95%.
Results: The type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence was 14.1%, pre-diabetes 12.8% and the one for hypertension was 26.24%. Age, body mass index and gender prognosticated in an independent manner the values of hypertension (p ‹ 0.001). Glycemia was prognosticated based on age (p ‹ 0.01) and body mass index (p ‹ 0.05).
Conclusions: Prevalence of type 2 diabetes was higher in low-income adult patients, but hypertension prevalence remained within normal parameters. In this population, the body mass index did not justify the high prevalence of type 2 diabetes nor that of pre-diabetes.


REFERENCES

  1. Centres of Disease Control. Diabetes. Nacional Diabetes Fact Sheet. United States, 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/ pdf/ndfs_2005.pdf

  2. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, et al. Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hipertension 2003;42:1206-52.

  3. Velázquez MO, Rosas PM, Lara EA, Pastelón HG. Hipertensión arterial en México: resultados de la encuesta nacional de salud (ENSA) 2000. Arch Cardiol Mex 2002;72:71-84.

  4. Vázquez-Martínez JL, Gómez-Dantés H, Fernándes-Cantón Sonia. Diabetes mellitus en la población adulta del IMSS. Resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2000. Rev Méd IMSS 2006;44:13-26.

  5. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Position Statement. Diabetes Care 2004;27: S5-S10.

  6. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. N:Y: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1977.

  7. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp R. Study designs in medical research. In Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. Appleton & Lange. (Prd. Ed) Langan C. 1990. 6-19.

  8. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2006. Position Statement. Diabetes Care 29:S4-S42, 2006

  9. World Health Organization. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycemia. 2006. http://www. who.int/diabetes/publications/en/

  10. Stern MP, Gonzalez C, Mitchell BD, et al. Genetic and environmental determinants of type II diabetes in Mexico City and San Antonio. Diabetes 1992;41:484-92.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Univer. 2007;9