medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2008, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2008; 9 (1)

Use of the ultrasonic scalpel in the extraction of a thoracoscopic pulmonary biopsy. Initial experience

Careaga RG, Villalpando CR, Morales JE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 35-38
PDF size: 144.19 Kb.


Key words:

Thoracoscopy, virtual technic surgery, telemedicine, lung disease, ultrasonic scalpel.

ABSTRACT

Background and objective: The objective of this paper is to present our experience with the use of ultrasonic scalpel for thoracoscopic lung biopsy. Material and methods: Two female patients with diffuse bilateral lung disease were selected for lung biopsy for diagnosis. The procedure was realized via thoracoscopic approach with three port-access. Ultrasonic scalpel was used for section and we do not use any material to seal the cut area. We placed chest tube for lung expansion an surveillance. Results: There were no morbidity or mortality. There was no need to convert the procedure to thoracotomy, and no air leak was observed during the surgery or in postoperative period. Conclusion: It was concluded that the ultrasonic scalpel for thoracoscopic lung biopsy is safe, useful and does not increase morbidity.


REFERENCES

  1. Amaral HF. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 200 consecutive patients using an ultrasonically activated scalpel. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995; 5: 255-62.

  2. Ohtsuka T, Wolf RK, Wurnig P, Park SE. Thoracoscopic limited pericardial resection with an ultrasonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: 855-6.

  3. Benítez M. Bisturí armónico. En: Heredia-Jarero NM, Bautista G, Fernández O, Fuentes JL, eds. Cirugía de invasión mínima. 2ª ed. Intersistemas SA, México. 1997: 95-105.

  4. Eichfield U, Tannapfel A, Steinert M, Friedich T. Evaluation of ultrascision in lung metastatic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1181-4.

  5. Aoki T, Kaseda S. Thoracoscopic resection of the lung with the ultrasonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 687: 1181-3.

  6. Chang AC, Yee J, Orringer MB, Iannettoni MD. Diagnostic thoracoscopic lung biopsy: an outpatient experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 1942-7.

  7. Okada M, Mimura T, Ikegaki J, Katoh H, Itoh H, Tsubota N. A novel video-assisted anatomic segmentectomy technique: selective segmental inflation via bronchofiberoptic jet followed by cautery cutting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133(3): 753-8.

  8. Kang SK, Kunanandam T, Clark L. Prospective case-control study of surgical efficiency of ultrasonic shear («harmonic scalpel») thyroidectomy compared with conventional thyroidectomy. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 19: 1-3.

  9. Tanaka K, Hagiwara M, Kondo Y, Okada K, Masuko H, Hata T et al. Usefulness of ultrasonically activated scalpel for pulmonary resection in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Kyobu Geka 2006; 59: 1171-5.

  10. Suzuki K, Nagai K, Yoshida J, Ohmatsu H, Takahashi K, Nishimura M et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Indications for preoperative marking. Chest 1999; 115: 563- 8.

  11. Hasegawa S, Isowa N, Bando T, Wada H. The inadvisability of thoracoscopic lung biopsy on patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest 2002; 122: 1067- 8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2008;9